Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAVIDSON, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by PATE, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DAVIDSON, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by PATE, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DAVIDSON, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by PATE, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Water Relations of the Mistletoe Amyema fitzgeraldii and its Host Acacia acuminata

NEIL J. DAVIDSON 1 and JOHN S. PATE

The University of Western Australia, Department of Botany Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia

To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Water relations of the mistletoe Amyema fitzgeraldii and its host Acacia acuminata were studied near Geraldton, Western Australia. Transpiration rates of host and parasite under unstressed winter conditions varied more than 300–fold between day and night while leaf water potential gradients between the partners remained within the range 0·4–0·6 MPa. Plots of transpiration against leaf water potential indicated closely similar fluid phase resistances in host and parasite during daytime but divergent behaviour at night due to an apparently large increase in resistance of the haustorial junction between the partners. Data for summer and winter studies across a full range of light intensities showed the parasite to transpire, on average, 1·4 times faster and to exhibit noticeably lower water use efficiencies than its host. Experiments following restorative changes at night in leaf water potentials of host and parasite on detached host branches supplied through their cut ends with water indicated that the haustorium offered a major resistance to water uptake by the parasite. Restoration of leaf water potentials by the parasite lagged markedly behind that of the host, especially during winter, leading to a rapid build up in potential gradient between partners. A phase of rapid flow into the parasite then followed, presumably motivated by lowering of the haustorial resistance. Reversal of the potential gradient between host and parasite was recorded in a night-time study involving a bagged (non-transpiring) mistletoe attached to a host branch frozen at the base to prevent further water uptake. Mechanisms are proposed to account for the apparently highly variable nature of the resistance of the haustorium.

Key words: Mistletoe, transpiration, haustorial resistance, Amyema fitzgeraldii, Acacia acuminata


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.