Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Trevino, B.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Trevino, B.A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Trevino, B.A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Stem flow and porometer measurements of transpiration from honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa)

R.J. Ansley1,3, W.A. Dugas2, M.L. Heuer2 and B.A. Trevino1

1Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Vernon, TX 76384, USA
2Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Blackland Research Center Temple, TX 76502, USA

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: + 1 817 553 4657

The objective of this study was to compare stem flow and porometer methods of measuring transpiration of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) trees on a semiarid site. Stem flow was measured using heat balance stem flow gauges. Porometer measurements of leaf stomatal conductance (gs) were made within foliage layers of each stem and scaled to transpiration values for the entire stem (Estem) using stem leaf area. Simultaneous measurements using both methods were made diurnally and under artificially imposed stem shading or defoliation in June and October 1990. Stem flow and Estem had similar diumal patterns except on 2 d in June when Estem increased during the afternoon while stem flow declined relative to midday values. During October, Estem was greater than stem flow throughout the day. This was attributed to sampling error in which only undamaged leaves were used for porometer measurements yet, by this time in the growing season, many leaves on each stem were damaged from insects or wind and likely had lower transpiration rates. A regression coefficient between Estem and stem flow of 0.79 in June and 0.91 in October suggested the two methods were comparable, but there was considerable variation between methods during peak transpiration rates. Both techniques detected that artificial shading or defoliation caused similar relative declines in transpiration. Results imply that estimates of stem transpiration can be obtained by scaling porometer measurements of leaves but accuracy declines at higher transpiration rates.

Key words: Sap flow, evapotranspiration, stomatal conductance, scaling, water relations


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.