Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croker, J.
Right arrow Articles by Auge, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Croker, J.
Right arrow Articles by Auge, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Croker, J.
Right arrow Articles by Auge, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol 49, 761-774, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Stomatal sensitivity of six temperate, deciduous tree species to non-hydraulic root-to-shoot signalling of partial soil drying

J Croker, W Witte and R Auge
Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station, OHLD, University of Tennessee, PO Box 1071, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071, USACorresponding author; e-mail: auge@utk.edu

The objective of this study were to (1) characterize stomatal response of six deciduous tree species to non-hydraulic, root-sourced signals of soil drying, and (2) test whether species sensitivity to non-hydraulic signalling is allied with their drought avoidance and tolerance profiles. Saplings were grown with roots divided between two pots. Three treatments were compared: one half of the root system watered and half droughted (WD), one half of the root system watered and half severed (WS), both halves watered (WW). Drying about half of the root system caused non-hydraulic declines in stomatal conductance (gs) in all species, with gs of WD plants reduced to from 40% to 60% of WS controls. Declines in stomatal conductance were closely related to declining soil matric potential (m) between -0.01 and -0.10 MPa. Soil m required to cause declines in gs of WD plants to 80% of WS controls varied from a high of -0.013 to a low of -0.044 MPa. Stomatal inhibition varied somewhat with leaf age in half of the species. Leaf osmotic potentials during soil drying were mostly similar among treatments. Although stomatal sensitivity to the non-hydraulic, root-sourced signal (characterized as decline in gs per unit decline in soil ) was not closely correlated with previously identified lethal leaf water potentials or capacity for osmotic adjustment, species having the highest stomatal sensitivity also had the least hydration tolerance. This suggests that stomatal sensitivity to non-hydraulic root signals may be mechanistically linked to a limited extent with other characteristics defining relative species drought tolerance.Keywords: Non-hydraulic signalling, osmotic potential, stomatal conductance, temperate deciduous trees, water relations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. DaCosta, Z. Wang, and B. Huang
Physiological Adaptation of Kentucky Bluegrass to Localized Soil Drying
Crop Sci., July 1, 2004; 44(4): 1307 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
U. K. Vogt
Hydraulic vulnerability, vessel refilling, and seasonal courses of stem water potential of Sorbus aucuparia L. and Sambucus nigra L.
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2001; 52(360): 1527 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.