Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fiscus, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reid, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fiscus, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reid, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fiscus, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol 49, 885-895, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Effects of elevated [CO2] and/or ozone on limitations to CO2 assimilation in soybean (Glycine max)

C Reid and E Fiscus
Department of Crop Science, Agricultural Research Service, Box 7632, North Carolina State University, 1509 Varsity Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, and Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, 1509 Varsity Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; Corresponding author; e-mail: chantal_reid@ncsu.edu

Soybean (Glycine max) was grown in open-top field chambers at ambient (360 mol mol-1) or doubled [CO2] either in charcoal-filtered air (20 nmol mol-1 [O3]) or in non-filtered air supplemented to 1,5 x ambient [O3] (70 nmol mol-1) to determine the major limitations to assimilation under conditions of elevated [CO2] and/or [O3]. Through plant ontogeny, assimilation versus intercellular CO2 concentration (A/Ci) responses were measured to assess the limitations to assimilation imposed by the capacity for Rubisco carboxylation, RuBP regeneration, and stomatal diffusion.In the vegetative stages, no significant treatment effects of elevated [CO2] and/or [O3] were observed on Rubisco carboxylation efficiency (CE), light and CO2-saturated assimilation capacity (Amax), and chlorophyll content (Chl). However, for plants grown in elevated [CO2], the assimilation rate at growth [CO2] (A) was 60% higher than at ambient [CO2] up to the seed maturation stage, and the potential rate of assimilation by Rubisco capacity (Ap) was increased. Also in elevated [CO2]: A was 51% of Ap; the relative stomatal limitation (%Stomata) was 5%; and the relative RuBP regeneration limitation (%RuBP) was 44%. In ambient [CO2], O3 gradually decreased A per unit leaf area, but had little effect on Ap and the relative limitations to assimilation where A remained 51% of Ap, %Stomata was 27%, and %RuBP was 22%.During reproduction, CE declined for plants grown in elevated [CO2] and/or [O3]; Ap was unaffected by elevated [CO2], but was reduced by [O3] at ambient [CO2]; A increased to 72% of Ap in elevated [CO2] and/or [O3]-fumigated air; the %Stomata increased; and the %RuBP decreased, to become non significant in elevated [CO2] from the beginning of seed growth on, and in O3-fumigated air at ambient [CO2] at the seed maturation stage. The decrease in %RuBP occurred concomitantly with an increase in Amax and Chl. Significant [CO2] x [O3] interactions support the lack of an O3 effect on assimilation and its limitations at elevated [CO2] during seed maturation. These data suggest that elevated [CO2] alleviated some of the effects of O3 on photosynthesis.Keywords: CO2 by O3 interactions, elevated [CO2], O3 fumigation, Rubisco carboxylation efficiency, RuBP regeneration.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
F. L. Booker, K. O. Burkey, W. A. Pursley, and A. S. Heagle
Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Ozone Effects on Peanut: I. Gas-Exchange, Biomass, and Leaf Chemistry
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1475 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. M. Christ, E. A. Ainsworth, R. Nelson, U. Schurr, and A. Walter
Anticipated yield loss in field-grown soybean under elevated ozone can be avoided at the expense of leaf growth during early reproductive growth stages in favourable environmental conditions
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2006; 57(10): 2267 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
F. L. Booker and E. L. Fiscus
The role of ozone flux and antioxidants in the suppression of ozone injury by elevated CO2 in soybean
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2005; 56(418): 2139 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
F. L. Booker, J. E. Miller, E. L. Fiscus, W. A. Pursley, and L. A. Stefanski
Comparative Responses of Container- versus Ground-Grown Soybean to Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Ozone
Crop Sci., March 28, 2005; 45(3): 883 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. B. Morgan, C. J. Bernacchi, D. R. Ort, and S. P. Long
An In Vivo Analysis of the Effect of Season-Long Open-Air Elevation of Ozone to Anticipated 2050 Levels on Photosynthesis in Soybean
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2004; 135(4): 2348 - 2357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. L. LaDeau and J. S. Clark
Rising CO2 Levels and the Fecundity of Forest Trees
Science, April 6, 2001; 292(5514): 95 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.