Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol 49, 1405-1411, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press
S Adams, S Pearson and P Hadley
Reciprocal transfer experiments can be used to describe the stages of
photoperiod sensitivity in day-length-sensitive plants. However, there are
inconsistencies in the literature concerning the techniques used and, more
importantly, the assumptions made when analysing such data sets. This paper
appraises the use of reciprocal transfer experiments, with chrysanthemum as
a model (short day) plant.Experiments showed little evidence to suggest
that axillary meristems were incapable of responding to a floral stimulus
when released from apical dominance by pinching (even though the apex
appeared vegetative). Five short days given after pinching resulted in
sufficient induction to initiate an inflorescence, although seven short
days were required to commit a plant to flower with a leaf number similar
to plants grown in continuous short days. Floral initiation was then
visible at the apex after nine short days. Once the inflorescence had been
initiated, long days delayed the early stages of flower development.The
results are discussed with reference to reciprocal transfer experiments in
general, and specifically in relation to problems that arise when the
length of a 'juvenile' phase is confounded with the number of inductive
cycles for flower commitment.Keywords: Reciprocal
transfer, chrysanthemum, photoperiod, juvenility, flowering
ARTICLES
An appraisal of the use of reciprocal transfer experiments: assessing the stages of photoperiod sensitivity in chrysanthemum cv. Snowdon (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.)
The Department of Horticulture, School of Plant Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AS, UK; Corresponding author at Horticulture Research International, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF, UK
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Yin, P. C. Struik, J. Tang, C. Qi, and T. Liu Model analysis of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2005; 56(413): 959 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. ADAMS, M. MUNIR, V. M. VALDES, F. A. LANGTON, and S. D. JACKSON Using Flowering Times and Leaf Numbers to Model the Phases of Photoperiod Sensitivity in Antirrhinum majus L. Ann. Bot., November 1, 2003; 92(5): 689 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Adams, S. Pearson, and P. Hadley Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity J. Exp. Bot., April 15, 2001; 52(357): 655 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

