Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enjalbert, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brabant, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Enjalbert, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brabant, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Enjalbert, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brabant, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol 50, 283-290, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Molecular markers to study genetic drift and selection in wheat populations

J Enjalbert, I Goldringer, S Paillard and P Brabant
Station de Génétique Végétale, INRA/INA-PG UPS, Ferme du Moulon, F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; INA-PG, 16 rue Claude Bernard, F-65005 Paris, France; Corresponding author e-mail:isa@moulon.inra.fr

Studying the heterogeneity in variation of gene frequency among populations or between generations may be a possible way to detect genomic regions experiencing selection. In order to evaluate this approach, RFLP markers were used to compare the allelic frequencies in wheat populations that had been submitted to natural selection. In 1984, samples of two composite cross populations were distributed in the French network for dynamic management of genetic resources. Since then, all the sub-populations have been cultivated in the same sites with no human selection. The strong differentiation between populations found for agro-morphological traits (earliness, resistance to pathogens, ...) provided evidence of their adaptation to local conditions. The two initial populations and six derived sub-populations cultivated for 10 years in four contrasted sites were studied with RFLP markers. Differentiation between sub-populations based on RFLP diversity was highly significant. Variations on allelic frequencies of the 30 loci scored were found to be much greater than expected under genetic drift only. This led us to conclude that selection greatly influenced the evolution of the populations. Some of the loci clearly presented a higher differentiation than the others. This might indicate that they were genetically linked to other loci polymorphic in the populations and involved in adaptation. However, the effect of one selected gene on a marker, even located very close to the gene, could not be predicted with certainty. Hence, though the populations were predominantly selfing, it seems that initial linkage disequilibriums between markers and selected genes were not strong enough to control closely the evolution of allelic frequencies at the markers.Key words: Dynamic management, wheat, molecular markers, adaptation, natural selection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
I. GOLDRINGER, C. PROUIN, M. ROUSSET, N. GALIC, and I. BONNIN
Rapid Differentiation of Experimental Populations of Wheat for Heading Time in Response to Local Climatic Conditions
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2006; 98(4): 805 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
Y. S. N. Ferdinandez, B. E. Coulman, and Y.-B. Fu
Detecting Genetic Changes over Two Generations of Seed Increase in an Awned Slender Wheatgrass Population Using AFLP Markers
Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1064 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.