Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol 50, 391-398, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Optimization theory of stomatal behaviour II. Stomatal responses of several tree species of north Australia to changes in light, soil and atomospheric water content and temperature

D Thomas, D Eamus and D Bell
School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Northern Territory University, Darwin, NT Australia, 9090; Corresponding author e-mail: dane.thomas@ntu.edu.au

In a companion paper several methods of calculating the marginal unit water cost of plant carbon gain (E/A) were tested to determine whether stomata were behaving optimally in relation to regulating leaf gas exchange. In this paper one method is applied to several tropical tree species when leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference (D), photosynthetic photon flux density, leaf temperature, and atmospheric soil water availability were manipulated. The response of leaves that had expanded during the dry season were also compared to that of leaves that had expanded in the wet season. Few differences in absolute value of E/A, or the form of the relationship, were observed between species or between seasons. In the majority of species, E/A increased significantly as either leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference increased, at a leaf temperature of either 33C or 38C, or as in photosynthetic photon flux density increased. In contrast, as leaf temperature increased at constant D, E/A was generally constant. As pre-dawn water potential declined, E/A declined. The relationship between E/A and D did not differ whether internal or ambient carbon dioxide concentration were kept constant. It is concluded that stomata are only behaving optimally over a very small range of D. If a larger range of D is used, to incorporate values that more closely reflect those experienced by tropical trees in a savanna environment optimization is incomplete.Key words: Stomatal optimization theory, marginal unit water cost.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.