Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (57)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawkesford, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawkesford, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hawkesford, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 342, pp. 131-138, January 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Plant responses to sulphur deficiency and the genetic manipulation of sulphate transporters to improve S-utilization efficiency

Malcolm J. Hawkesford1

IACR-Rothamsted, Biochemistry and Physiology Department, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK

Decreased inputs of S have increased the incidence of S-deficiency in crops, resulting in decreased yields and quality. Remediation by fertilizer application is not always successful because this often results in an uneven supply of S. The ability to respond to S-deficiency stress varies between crops and this is a target for the genetic improvement of S-utilization efficiency. Improved capture of resources, the accumulation of greater reserves of S and improved mechanisms for the remobilization of these reserves are required. It is an inability to over-accumulate S and subsequently, effectively remobilize S-reserves, which restricts optimum S-use efficiency. Genetic manipulation of the transporters and their expression will contribute to overcoming these limitations. Control of gene expression limits excess uptake and activity of the assimilatory pathway: the endogenous expression of sulphate transporters is regulated by S-supply, with negative regulation from reduced S-containing compounds and positive regulation by O-acetylserine, the C/N skeleton precursor of cysteine. Constitutive expression of the transporter will remove this control and may enable the accumulation of sulphate reserves. Sulphate in the vacuole and other pools of reduced sulphur, such as glutathione or protein may be remobilized under S-limiting conditions. Low efficiencies of these remobilization processes, particularly the remobilization of vacuolar sulphate, suggest that the transporters involved in the remobilization are a target for modification. Transporters are involved in facilitating the multiple trans-membrane transport steps between uptake of sulphate from the soil solution, and delivery to the site of reduction in the chloroplast or plastid. A gene family has been identified and phylogenetic relationships based on primary sequence information indicate multiple sub-groups. Groups which are expressed in roots, in shoots and in both tissue types are postulated, however, the functional roles for these groups and the identification of transporters involved in recycling remain to be confirmed.

Key words: sulphate transporter, sulphur, S-limitation, S-inputs, S-mobilization, cereal nutrition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. Dubousset, M. Abdallah, A. S. Desfeux, P. Etienne, F. Meuriot, M. J. Hawkesford, J. Gombert, R. Segura, M-P. Bataille, S. Reze, et al.
Remobilization of leaf S compounds and senescence in response to restricted sulphate supply during the vegetative stage of oilseed rape are affected by mineral N availability
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(11): 3239 - 3253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
F. F. Nocito, C. Lancilli, B. Crema, P. Fourcroy, J.-C. Davidian, and G. A. Sacchi
Heavy Metal Stress and Sulfate Uptake in Maize Roots
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2006; 141(3): 1138 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. L. BOURANIS, S. N. CHORIANOPOULOU, C. KOLLIAS, P. MANIOU, V. E. PROTONOTARIOS, V. F. SIYIANNIS, and M. J. HAWKESFORD
Dynamics of Aerenchyma Distribution in the Cortex of Sulfate-deprived Adventitious Roots of Maize
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2006; 97(5): 695 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Riemenschneider, K. Riedel, R. Hoefgen, J. Papenbrock, and H. Hesse
Impact of Reduced O-Acetylserine(thiol)lyase Isoform Contents on Potato Plant Metabolism
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2005; 137(3): 892 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. Buchner, C. E. E. Stuiver, S. Westerman, M. Wirtz, R. Hell, M. J. Hawkesford, and L. J. De Kok
Regulation of Sulfate Uptake and Expression of Sulfate Transporter Genes in Brassica oleracea as Affected by Atmospheric H2S and Pedospheric Sulfate Nutrition
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2004; 136(2): 3396 - 3408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. Saito
Sulfur Assimilatory Metabolism. The Long and Smelling Road
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2004; 136(1): 2443 - 2450.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. Y. Hirai and K. Saito
Post-genomics approaches for the elucidation of plant adaptive mechanisms to sulphur deficiency
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2004; 55(404): 1871 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
V. J. Nikiforova, B. Gakiere, S. Kempa, M. Adamik, L. Willmitzer, H. Hesse, and R. Hoefgen
Towards dissecting nutrient metabolism in plants: a systems biology case study on sulphur metabolism
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2004; 55(404): 1861 - 1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. Durenkamp and L. J. De Kok
Impact of pedospheric and atmospheric sulphur nutrition on sulphur metabolism of Allium cepa L., a species with a potential sink capacity for secondary sulphur compounds
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2004; 55(404): 1821 - 1830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. Chiaiese, N. Ohkama-Ohtsu, L. Molvig, R. Godfree, H. Dove, C. Hocart, T. Fujiwara, T. J. V. Higgins, and L. M. Tabe
Sulphur and nitrogen nutrition influence the response of chickpea seeds to an added, transgenic sink for organic sulphur
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2004; 55(404): 1889 - 1901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. Buchner, H. Takahashi, and M. J. Hawkesford
Plant sulphate transporters: co-ordination of uptake, intracellular and long-distance transport
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2004; 55(404): 1765 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Y. Hirai, M. Yano, D. B. Goodenowe, S. Kanaya, T. Kimura, M. Awazuhara, M. Arita, T. Fujiwara, and K. Saito
From The Cover: Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understanding of global responses to nutritional stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana
PNAS, July 6, 2004; 101(27): 10205 - 10210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
H. Hesse, V. Nikiforova, B. Gakiere, and R. Hoefgen
Molecular analysis and control of cysteine biosynthesis: integration of nitrogen and sulphur metabolism
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2004; 55(401): 1283 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. J. Meyer and M. D. Fricker
Control of Demand-Driven Biosynthesis of Glutathione in Green Arabidopsis Suspension Culture Cells
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2002; 130(4): 1927 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
N. Ohkama, D. B. Goto, T. Fujiwara, and S. Naito
Differential Tissue-Specific Response to Sulfate and Methionine of a Soybean Seed Storage Protein Promoter Region in Transgenic Arabidopsis
Plant Cell Physiol., November 15, 2002; 43(11): 1266 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.