Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lemontey, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boutin, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lemontey, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boutin, J.-P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lemontey, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boutin, J.-P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 343, pp. 167-175, February 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Maternal genotype influences pea seed size by controlling both mitotic activity during early embryogenesis and final endoreduplication level/cotyledon cell size in mature seed

Claire Lemontey1, Claire Mousset-Déclas2,4, Nathalie Munier-Jolain3 and Jean-Pierre Boutin1

1 INRA, Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Métabolisme et la Nutrition des Plantes, Route de Saint-Cyr, 78026 Versailles cedex, France
2 INRA, Unité de Recherche en Génétique et Amélioration des Plantes, BV 1540, 21034 Dijon cedex, France
3 INRA, Station d'Agronomie, BV 1540, 21034 Dijon Cedex, France

When reciprocal crosses are made between different pea genotypes, there is a strong maternal influence on mature seed size of the reciprocal hybrids, i.e. their dry weights are similar to that of seeds obtained from their maternal parents. Reciprocal crosses between pea varieties having very different mature seed sizes were used to investigate how the maternal genotype controls seed development and mature seed size. The differences in dry seed weight between genotypes and reciprocal hybrids reflected differences in both cotyledon cell number and mean cell volume, and the maternal control on the establishment of these two traits was investigated. Using flow cytometry, data relative to endoreduplication kinetics in cotyledons during the transition between the cell division phase and maturation were obtained. The appearance of nuclei having an 8C DNA content indicates the initiation of the endoreduplication phenomenon and thus the end of the cell division phase. It was shown that the duration of the cell division phase was the same in the reciprocal hybrids, its value being intermediate between those recorded for their maternal parents. This result indicates that the timing of development of the embryo is not under maternal control, but depends on its own genotype. Consequently, maternal genotype must influence the mitotic rate during the cell division phase to achieve differences in cell number found in the cotyledons of mature F1-reciprocal hybrids. The final level of endoreduplication in cotyledons of mature seeds was also investigated. This study showed that there is a close relationship (r2=0.919) between the endoreduplication level in mature cotyledons and seed dry weight or mean volume of cotyledon cells, suggesting that both maternal and non-maternal factors could control the number of endoreduplicating cycles in the cotyledons and, hypothetically, the cotyledon cell size.

Key words: Cell division, cell size, endoreduplication, flow cytometry, maternal influence, Pisum sativum


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Z. Yang, E. J. van Oosterom, D. R. Jordan, and G. L. Hammer
Pre-anthesis ovary development determines genotypic differences in potential kernel weight in sorghum
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2009; 60(4): 1399 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
N. Bertin, M. Causse, B. Brunel, D. Tricon, and M. Genard
Identification of growth processes involved in QTLs for tomato fruit size and composition
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2009; 60(1): 237 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Burstin, P. Marget, M. Huart, A. Moessner, B. Mangin, C. Duchene, B. Desprez, N. Munier-Jolain, and G. Duc
Developmental Genes Have Pleiotropic Effects on Plant Morphology and Source Capacity, Eventually Impacting on Seed Protein Content and Productivity in Pea
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 768 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
N. Bertin, A. Lecomte, B. Brunel, S. Fishman, and M. Genard
A model describing cell polyploidization in tissues of growing fruit as related to cessation of cell proliferation
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2007; 58(7): 1903 - 1913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
C. Cheniclet, W. Y. Rong, M. Causse, N. Frangne, L. Bolling, J.-P. Carde, and J.-P. Renaudin
Cell Expansion and Endoreduplication Show a Large Genetic Variability in Pericarp and Contribute Strongly to Tomato Fruit Growth
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2005; 139(4): 1984 - 1994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
N. BERTIN
Analysis of the Tomato Fruit Growth Response to Temperature and Plant Fruit Load in Relation to Cell Division, Cell Expansion and DNA Endoreduplication
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2005; 95(3): 439 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
J. T. Leiva-Neto, G. Grafi, P. A. Sabelli, R. A. Dante, Y.-m. Woo, S. Maddock, W. J. Gordon-Kamm, and B. A. Larkins
A Dominant Negative Mutant of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase A Reduces Endoreduplication but Not Cell Size or Gene Expression in Maize Endosperm
PLANT CELL, July 1, 2004; 16(7): 1854 - 1869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
M. M. Castellano, J. C. del Pozo, E. Ramirez-Parra, S. Brown, and C. Gutierrez
Expression and Stability of Arabidopsis CDC6 Are Associated with Endoreplication
PLANT CELL, December 1, 2001; 13(12): 2671 - 2686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. L. Setter and B. A. Flannigan
Water deficit inhibits cell division and expression of transcripts involved in cell proliferation and endoreduplication in maize endosperm
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2001; 52(360): 1401 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
B. A. Larkins, B. P. Dilkes, R. A. Dante, C. M. Coelho, Y.-m. Woo, and Y. Liu
Investigating the hows and whys of DNA endoreduplication
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2001; 52(355): 183 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.