Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 345, pp. 777-784,
April 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press
Effects of short episodes of heat stress on flower production and fruit-set of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
Plant Environment Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AD, UK
Groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) are an important crop of the semi-arid tropics where they are often exposed to maximum temperatures of >40 °C for short periods during the growing season. The objectives of this study were to determine: (i) the effects of short periods of exposure to high temperature on flower production (FN), the proportion of flowers forming fruits (fruit-set) and the number of pegs and pods per plant (RNt); (ii) whether fruit-set is affected by high temperature during different periods of daylight in each diurnal cycle; and (iii) whether responses to temperature were qualitative or quantitative. Plants of cv. ICGV 86015 were grown in controlled environments at a day/night temperature of 28/22 °C from sowing until 9 d after flowering (DAF). Then, cohorts of plants were: (a) exposed to day temperature of 28, 34, 42 or 48 °C for 2, 4 or 6 d; or were (b) exposed to 34, 42 or 48 °C for 6 d either throughout a 12 h day (08.00 to 20.00 h, WD), or only during the first 6 h (AM) or second 6 h (PM) of the day. Values of RNt were significantly reduced by high temperature, by duration of exposure, and by timing of exposure. Variation in FN was quantitatively related to floral bud temperatures during the day over the range 28–43 °C. In contrast, only floral bud temperatures >36 °C during AM and WD significantly reduced fruit-set and hence RNt, whereas high PM temperature had no effect on fruit-set. These findings indicate that the response of RNt to day temperature is quantitative and can be modelled by combining the responses of FN and fruit-set to temperature.
Key words: Groundnut, flowering, fruit-set, heat stress, temperature.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. V. K. Jagadish, P. Q. Craufurd, and T. R. Wheeler Phenotyping Parents of Mapping Populations of Rice for Heat Tolerance during Anthesis Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 1140 - 1146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Sato, M. M. Peet, and J. F. Thomas Determining critical pre- and post-anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2002; 53(371): 1187 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Q. Craufurd, P. V. V. Prasad, and R. J. Summerfield Dry Matter Production and Rate of Change of Harvest Index at High Temperature in Peanut Crop Sci., January 1, 2002; 42(1): 146 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|