Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheurwater, I.
Right arrow Articles by Lambers, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scheurwater, I.
Right arrow Articles by Lambers, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scheurwater, I.
Right arrow Articles by Lambers, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 347, pp. 1089-1097, June 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Respiratory costs and rate of protein turnover in the roots of a fast-growing (Dactylis glomerata L.) and a slow-growing (Festuca ovina L.) grass species

Ingeborg Scheurwater1,4, Monika Dünnebacke1,2, Rainer Eising2 and Hans Lambers1,3

1 Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Biology, Utrecht University, PO Box 80084, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 Institut für Botanik, University of Münster, Schlossgarten 3, D-48149 Münster, Germany
3 Plant Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands WA 6907, Australia

Protein turnover is generally regarded as one of the most important maintenance processes in plants in terms of energy requirements. In this study, the contribution of protein turnover to the respiratory costs for maintenance in the roots of two grass species, the fast-growing Dactylis glomerata L. and the slow-growing Festuca ovina L., is evaluated. Plants were grown under controlled-environment conditions in a nutrient solution to which was added at a relative addition rate of 0.2 and 0.1 mol N mol-1 N already present in the plant d-1 for D. glomerata and F. ovina, respectively, so as to obtain a steady exponential growth rate close to the plants' maximum relative growth rate. Pulse-chase labelling with 14C-leucine was used to determine the rate of protein turnover in the grass roots. The rate of turnover of the total protein pool did not differ significantly between the two species. The protein degradation constant in D. glomerata and F. ovina was 0.156 and 0.116 g protein g-1 protein d-1, respectively, which corresponds with a total protein half-life of 4 d and 6 d. Assuming specific respiratory costs for protein turnover of 148 mmol ATP g-1 protein, the estimated respiratory costs for protein turnover in the roots were 2.8 and 2.4 mmol ATP g-1 root DM d-1 in D. glomerata and F. ovina, respectively. Both the fast- and the slow-growing grass spent between 22–30% of their daily ATP production for maintenance on protein turnover, which corresponds to 11–15% of the total root ATP production per day. Note that the data presented in this abstract are based on the assumption that 50% recycling of the 14C-labelled leucine took place in the roots of both grass species.

Key words: Dactylis glomerata L., Festuca ovina L., maintenance, protein turnover, relative growth rate, specific respiratory costs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. Persson, P. Gardestrom, and T. Nasholm
Uptake, metabolism and distribution of organic and inorganic nitrogen sources by Pinus sylvestris
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2006; 57(11): 2651 - 2659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.