Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kandlbinder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kandlbinder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, W. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kandlbinder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, W. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 347, pp. 1099-1105, June 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Nitrate reductases from leaves of Ricinus (Ricinus communis L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) have different regulatory properties

Andrea Kandlbinder, Hendrik Weiner and Werner M. Kaiser1

Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie und Biophysik, Julius-von-Sachs-Platz 2, D-97082 Würzburg, Germany

The activity of nitrate reductase (+Mg2+, NRact) in illuminated leaves from spinach, barley and pea was 50–80% of the maximum activity (+EDTA, NRmax). However, NR from leaves of Ricinus communis L. had a 10-fold lower NRact, while NRmax was similar to that in spinach leaves. The low NRact of Ricinus was independent of day-time and nitrate nutrition, and varied only slightly with leaf age. Possible factors in Ricinusextracts inhibiting NR were not found. NRact from Ricinus, unlike the spinach enzyme, was very low at pH 7.6, but much higher at more acidic pH with a distinct maximum at pH 6.5. NRmax had a broad pH response profile that was siilar for the spinach and the Ricinus enzyme. Accordingly, the Mg2+-sensitivity of NR from Ricinus was strongly pH-dependent (increasing sensitivity with increasing pH), and as a result, the apparent activation state of NR from a Ricinus extract varied dramatically with pH and Mg2+concentration. Following a light–dark transition, NRact from Ricinus decreased within 1 h by 40%, but this decrease was paralleled by NRmax. In contrast to the spinach enzyme, Ricinus-NR was hardly inactivated by incubating leaf extracts with ATP plus okadaic acid. A competition analysis with antibodies against the potential 14-3-3 binding site around ser 543 of the spinach enzyme revealed that Ricinus-NR containes the same site. Removal of 14-3-3 proteins from Ricinus-NR by anion exchange chromatography, activated spinach-NR but caused little if any activation of Ricinus-NR. It is suggested that Mg2+-inhibition of Ricinus-NR does not require 14-3-3 proteins. The rather slow changes in Ricinus-NR activity upon a light/dark transient may be mainly due to NR synthesis or degradation.

Key words: Activation state, nitrate reductase, Ricinus communis L., protein phosphorylation, 14-3-3 proteins.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. M. Kaiser, H. Weiner, A. Kandlbinder, C.-B. Tsai, P. Rockel, M. Sonoda, and E. Planchet
Modulation of nitrate reductase: some new insights, an unusual case and a potentially important side reaction
J. Exp. Bot., April 15, 2002; 53(370): 875 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. M. Kaiser and S. C. Huber
Post-translational regulation of nitrate reductase: mechanism, physiological relevance and environmental triggers
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2001; 52(363): 1981 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.