Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lobello, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pugliesi, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lobello, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pugliesi, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lobello, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pugliesi, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 349, pp. 1403-1412, August 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

Hormonal influence on photocontrol of the protandry in the genus Helianthus

G. Lobello1, M. Fambrini1, R. Baraldi2, B. Lercari3 and C. Pugliesi1,4

1 Dipartimento di Biologia delle Piante Agrarie, Sezione di Genetica, via Matteotti 1B, I-56124, Pisa, Italy
2 Istituto di Ecofisiologia delle Piante Arboree da Frutto, CNR, via Gobetti, 101, I-40129, Bologna, Italy
3 Dipartimento di Biologia delle Piante Agrarie, Sezione di Orticoltura e Floricoltura, viale delle Piagge, 23 I-56124, Pisa, Italy

Under natural photoperiodic conditions protandry in hermaphrodite disc flowers of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is determined by the different elongation rates of the style and filaments. The elongation of the filament and style starts simultaneously after the daily dark period, but the style growth rate is slower. When plants close to anthesis are exposed to continuous white light (WL) a loss of protandry occurs: the filaments do not grow far enough to extrude the anthers from the corolla. The histological analyses show that the number of filament epidermal cells remains unaltered after organ elongation and that cells respond to photoperiod only by cell expansion. Emasculation does not substantially inhibit filament cell expansion, whereas isolation of the filament or stamen from the corolla suggests that this organ could be the perception site of the filament growth stimulus. In vitro treatments with auxin (indole-3-acetic acid, IAA or {alpha}-naphthaleneacetic acid, NAA) reverses the inhibition of cell expansion caused by continuous WL, whereas gibberellic acid (GA3) at high concentrations reproduces the effect of continuous WL. Experiments carried out on various Helianthus spp. show that all these plants have evolved the same photo- and hormonal-control of the protandry. In experiments in which the light treatments were continued for 24 h, the auxins drastically reduced the inhibiting effect of red light (R) and dichromatic treatments FR (far red)+R, whereas GA3 repressed filament extension regardless of light quality. As far as auxins are concerned, the response of sunflower filaments does not appear to be connected with the polar transport of the hormone. Moreover, the promoting effect of darkness is not mediated by an increase of endogenous free IAA in disc flowers. However, sunflower filaments manifested a similar temporal pattern of response to the light/dark cycle and to auxin.

Key words: Anthesis, auxins, gibberellic acid, filament, protandry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
B. Noh, A. S. Murphy, and E. P. Spalding
Multidrug Resistance-like Genes of Arabidopsis Required for Auxin Transport and Auxin-Mediated Development
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2001; 13(11): 2441 - 2454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.