Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Repo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rikala, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Repo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rikala, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Repo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rikala, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 353, pp. 2095-2107, December 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

The electrical impedance spectroscopy of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) shoots in relation to cold acclimation

T. Repo1,4, G. Zhang1,3, A. Ryyppö1 and R. Rikala2

1 Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, PO Box 111, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland
2 Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki Research Station, Juntintie 40, FIN-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland

Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was applied to stems of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in a provenance field trial during frost hardening to find an EIS parameter for assessing frost hardiness (FH) without a controlled freezing test. The FH of stems and needles assessed by controlled freezing tests was compared with the equivalent circuit EIS parameters of a distributed model of stems (not exposed to controlled freezing treatment) and with dry matter (DM) content of stems. Significant differences in the equivalent circuit parameters, FH and DM content were found between provenances. The relaxation time ({tau}1), describing the peak of the high frequency arc of the impedance spectrum, and the intracellular resistance (ri) of stems increased with increasing FH. According to the linear regression, the coefficient of determination (R2) between the FH of stems and needles with {tau}1 of the stem was 0.87 and 0.89, and with ri of the stem 0.74 and 0.85, respectively. The relation between FH and {tau}1 changed with the degree of hardiness. The highest coefficient of determination was 0.95 in September when the FH of needles, ranging from -10 °C to -25 °C, was predicted with an accuracy of ±2.0 °C. The resistance parameter r2, describing the width of the low frequency arc of the impedance spectrum, decreased prior to and during the initial hardening: significant differences were found between provenances. This indicates that r2 was not related to frost hardening per se. It is concluded that it is possible to distinguish the hardening patterns of different provenances by {tau}1 in the rapid phase of hardening without controlled freezing tests.

Key words: Dry matter content, frost hardiness, impedance spectroscopy, relaxation time, Scots pine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Plant EcolHome page
G. Zhang, Y.-q. Li, and S.-h. Dong
Assessing frost hardiness of Pinus bungeana shoots and needles by electrical impedance spectroscopy with and without freezing tests
J Plant Ecol, November 23, 2009; (2009) rtp023v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
E. Marsili, J. B. Rollefson, D. B. Baron, R. M. Hozalski, and D. R. Bond
Microbial Biofilm Voltammetry: Direct Electrochemical Characterization of Catalytic Electrode-Attached Biofilms
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2008; 74(23): 7329 - 7337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.