Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fricker, M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, A.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fricker, M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, A.J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fricker, M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, A.J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 356, pp. 631-640, April 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Confocal imaging of metabolism in vivo: pitfalls and possibilities

M.D. Fricker1 and A.J. Meyer2

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) has had wide application in morphological studies and ion imaging in plants, but little impact so far on biochemical investigations. This position is likely to change as the range of fluorescent probes increases. To illustrate the type of kinetic information that can be obtained using CLSM in an intact, living system, an analysis has been made of the two-step detoxification of monochlorobimane (MCB) following conjugation to glutathione (GSH) by a glutathione S-transferase in the cytoplasm and vacuolar sequestration of the fluorescent glutathione S-bimane (GSB) by a glutathione S-conjugate (GSX) pump. Fluorescence from the cytoplasm and vacuole of individual trichoblasts and atrichoblasts was measured from time-series of (x, y) optical sections in the elongation zone of Arabidopsis root tips. Intensity changes were calibrated and converted to amounts using compartment volumes, measured by stereological techniques. The data were well described using pseudo-first-order kinetics for the conjugation reaction and either Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Model I), or, as the GSX-pump was operating close to Vmax, a pseudo-zero-order reaction (Model II), for the GSX-pump. Analysis of 15 individual cells from two roots gave [GSH]cyt in the range 1.8–4 mM. GST activity was relatively constant on a cell basis in one root, but increased markedly in the other, giving a net increase in conjugation activity as cells progressed through the elongation zone. In contrast, GSX-pump activity increased in parallel with the increase in cell size in both roots, effectively maintaining a constant transport activity per unit root length or estimated vacuole surface area.

Key words: Confocal microscopy, glutathione, glutathione S-conjugate pump, glutathione S-transferase, monochlorobimane.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Rodriguez-Serrano, M. C. Romero-Puertas, D. M. Pazmino, P. S. Testillano, M. C. Risueno, L. A. del Rio, and L. M. Sandalio
Cellular Response of Pea Plants to Cadmium Toxicity: Cross Talk between Reactive Oxygen Species, Nitric Oxide, and Calcium
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2009; 150(1): 229 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
B. Zechmann, F. Mauch, L. Sticher, and M. Muller
Subcellular immunocytochemical analysis detects the highest concentrations of glutathione in mitochondria and not in plastids
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2008; 59(14): 4017 - 4027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Electron Microsc (Tokyo)Home page
B. Zechmann, G. Zellnig, and M. Muller
Immunocytochemical localization of glutathione precursors in plant cells
J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo), June 1, 2006; 55(3): 173 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
C. Ortega-Villasante, R. Rellan-Alvarez, F. F. Del Campo, R. O. Carpena-Ruiz, and L. E. Hernandez
Cellular damage induced by cadmium and mercury in Medicago sativa
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2005; 56(418): 2239 - 2251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant Physiol.Home page
M. P. Mezzari, K. Walters, M. Jelinkova, M.-C. Shih, C. L. Just, and J. L. Schnoor
Gene Expression and Microscopic Analysis of Arabidopsis Exposed to Chloroacetanilide Herbicides and Explosive Compounds. A Phytoremediation Approach
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2005; 138(2): 858 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant Physiol.Home page
A. J. Meyer and M. D. Fricker
Control of Demand-Driven Biosynthesis of Glutathione in Green Arabidopsis Suspension Culture Cells
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2002; 130(4): 1927 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
G. Noctor, L. Gomez, H. Vanacker, and C. H. Foyer
Interactions between biosynthesis, compartmentation and transport in the control of glutathione homeostasis and signalling
J. Exp. Bot., May 15, 2002; 53(372): 1283 - 1304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.