Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pittermann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sage, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pittermann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sage, R. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pittermann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sage, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 357, pp. 829-838, April 15, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

The response of the high altitude C4 grass Muhlenbergia montana (Nutt.) A.S. Hitchc. to long- and short-term chilling

Jarmila Pittermann2 and Rowan F. Sage1

Department of Botany, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S3B2

The acclimation of C4 photosynthesis to low temperature was studied in the montane grass Muhlenbergia montana in order to evaluate inherent limitations in the C4 photosynthetic pathway following chilling. Plants were grown in growth cabinets at 26 °C days, but at night temperatures of either 16 °C (the control treatment), 4 °C for at least 28 nights (the cold-acclimated treatment), or 1 night (the cold-stress treatment). Below a measurement temperature of 25 °C, little difference in the thermal response of the net CO2 assimilation rate (A) was observed between the control and cold-acclimated treatment. By contrast, above 30 °C, A in the cold-acclimated treatment was 10% greater than in the control treatment. The temperature responses of Rubisco activity and net CO2 assimilation rate were similar below 22 °C, indicating high metabolic control of Rubisco over the rate of photosynthesis at cool temperatures. Analysis of the response of A to intercellular CO2 level further supported a major limiting role for Rubisco below 20 °C. As temperature declined, the CO2 saturated plateau of A exhibited large reductions, while the initial slope of the CO2 response was little affected. This type of response is consistent with a Rubisco limitation, rather than limitations in PEP carboxylase capacity. Stomatal limitations at low temperature were not apparent because photosynthesis was CO2 saturated below 23 °C at air levels of CO2. In contrast to the response of photosynthesis to temperature and CO2 in plants acclimated for 4 weeks to low night temperature, plants exposed to 4 °C for one night showed substantial reduction in photosynthetic capacity at temperatures above 20 °C. Because these reductions were at both high and low CO2, enzymes associated with the C4 carbon cycle were implicated as the major mechanisms for the chilling inhibition. These results demonstrate that C4 plants from climates with low temperature during the growing season can fully acclimate to cold stress given sufficient time. This acclimation appears to involve reversal of injury to the C4 cycle following initial exposure to low temperature. By contrast, carbon gain at low temperatures generally appears to be constrained by the carboxylation capacity of Rubisco, regardless of acclimation time. The inability to overcome the Rubisco limitation at low temperature may be an inherent limitation restricting C4 photosynthetic performance in cooler climates.

Key words: Chilling, C4 plants, Muhlenbergia, photosynthesis, temperature response, Rubisco.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. Wang, A. R. Portis Jr., S. P. Moose, and S. P. Long
Cool C4 Photosynthesis: Pyruvate Pi Dikinase Expression and Activity Corresponds to the Exceptional Cold Tolerance of Carbon Assimilation in Miscanthus x giganteus
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2008; 148(1): 557 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. Wang, S. L. Naidu, A. R. Portis Jr, S. P. Moose, and S. P. Long
Can the cold tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthusxgiganteus relative to Zea mays be explained by differences in activities and thermal properties of Rubisco?
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1779 - 1787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. F. Sage and A. D. McKown
Is C4 photosynthesis less phenotypically plastic than C3 photosynthesis?
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 303 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. S. Kubien, S. von Caemmerer, R. T. Furbank, and R. F. Sage
C4 Photosynthesis at Low Temperature. A Study Using Transgenic Plants with Reduced Amounts of Rubisco
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2003; 132(3): 1577 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. L. Naidu, S. P. Moose, A. K. AL-Shoaibi, C. A. Raines, and S. P. Long
Cold Tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus x giganteus: Adaptation in Amounts and Sequence of C4 Photosynthetic Enzymes
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2003; 132(3): 1688 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. F. Sage
Variation in the kcat of Rubisco in C3 and C4 plants and some implications for photosynthetic performance at high and low temperature
J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2002; 53(369): 609 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.