Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (140)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dixit, V.
Right arrow Articles by Shyam, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dixit, V.
Right arrow Articles by Shyam, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dixit, V.
Right arrow Articles by Shyam, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 358, pp. 1101-1109, May 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

Differential antioxidative responses to cadmium in roots and leaves of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Azad)1

Vivek Dixit, Vivek Pandey and Radhey Shyam2

Stress Physiology, National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow 226001, India

Pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Azad) plants exposed to 4 and 40 µM of Cd for 7 d in hydroponic culture were analysed with reference to the distribution of metal, the accumulation of biomass and the metal's effects on antioxidants and antioxidative enzymes in roots and leaves. Cd-induced a decrease in plant biomass. The maximum accumulation of Cd occurred in roots followed by stems and leaves. An enhanced level of lipid peroxidation and an increased tissue concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in both roots and leaves indicated that Cd caused oxidative stress in pea plants. Roots and leaves of pea plants responded differently to Cd with reference to the induction of enhanced activities of most of the enzymes monitored in the present study. These differential responses to Cd were further found to be associated with levels of Cd to which the plants were exposed. Cd-induced enhancement in superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was more at 40 µM than at 4 µM in leaves. While catalase (CAT) prominently increased in leaves both at 4 and 40 µM Cd, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) showed maximum stimulation at 40 µM Cd in roots. Enhancement in glutathione reductase (GR) activity was also more at 40 µM than at 4 µM Cd in roots. While glutathione peroxidase (GPOX) activity decreased in roots and remained almost unmodified in leaves, glutathione S-transferase (GST) showed pronounced stimulation in both roots and leaves of pea plants exposed to 40 µM Cd. Increased activities of antioxidative enzymes in Cd-treated plants suggest that they have some additive function in the mechanism of metal tolerance in pea plants.

Key words: Cadmium, pea, oxidative stress, antioxidant, antioxidative enzymes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Rodriguez-Serrano, M. C. Romero-Puertas, D. M. Pazmino, P. S. Testillano, M. C. Risueno, L. A. del Rio, and L. M. Sandalio
Cellular Response of Pea Plants to Cadmium Toxicity: Cross Talk between Reactive Oxygen Species, Nitric Oxide, and Calcium
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2009; 150(1): 229 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-Y. Kim, D.-Y. Kim, D. Shim, W.-Y. Song, J. Lee, J. I. Schroeder, S. Kim, N. Moran, and Y. Lee
Expression of the Novel Wheat Gene TM20 Confers Enhanced Cadmium Tolerance to Bakers' Yeast
J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2008; 283(23): 15893 - 15902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
A. Paradiso, R. Berardino, M. C. de Pinto, L. Sanita di Toppi, M. M. Storelli, F. Tommasi, and L. De Gara
Increase in Ascorbate-Glutathione Metabolism as Local and Precocious Systemic Responses Induced by Cadmium in Durum Wheat Plants
Plant Cell Physiol., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 362 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
N. Horemans, T. Raeymaekers, K. Van Beek, A. Nowocin, R. Blust, K. Broos, A. Cuypers, J. Vangronsveld, and Y. Guisez
Dehydroascorbate uptake is impaired in the early response of Arabidopsis plant cell cultures to cadmium
J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2007; 58(15-16): 4307 - 4317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Ramos, M. R. Clemente, L. Naya, J. Loscos, C. Perez-Rontome, S. Sato, S. Tabata, and M. Becana
Phytochelatin Synthases of the Model Legume Lotus japonicus. A Small Multigene Family with Differential Response to Cadmium and Alternatively Spliced Variants
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2007; 143(3): 1110 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Uraguchi, I. Watanabe, A. Yoshitomi, M. Kiyono, and K. Kuno
Characteristics of cadmium accumulation and tolerance in novel Cd-accumulating crops, Avena strigosa and Crotalaria juncea
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2006; 57(12): 2955 - 2965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. Ortega-Villasante, R. Rellan-Alvarez, F. F. Del Campo, R. O. Carpena-Ruiz, and L. E. Hernandez
Cellular damage induced by cadmium and mercury in Medicago sativa
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2005; 56(418): 2239 - 2251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Metwally, I. Finkemeier, M. Georgi, and K.-J. Dietz
Salicylic Acid Alleviates the Cadmium Toxicity in Barley Seedlings
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2003; 132(1): 272 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.