Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 359, pp. 1259-1268,
June 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Original Papers |
The elongation rate at the base of a maize leaf shows an invariant pattern during both the steady-state elongation and the establishment of the elongation zone
Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, INRA, ENSAM, 34060 Montpellier, France
Spatial and temporal analyses of elongation and cell length of monocotyledon leaves have most often been performed during the period when leaves are visible and elongate at a constant rate (steady-state). In the present study, the focus was on the earlier stages, during the establishment of the elongation zone. Regardless of leaf development stage, the segment located between 0 and 35 mm from the leaf insertion point had a relative elongation rate that increased with distance from insertion point (accelerating zone) while the segment located further than 35 mm had a relative elongation rate that decreased (decelerating zone). This stable pattern held for both young, non-emerged leaves, where it was restricted to the portion corresponding to the length of the blade, and for leaves during steady-state elongation. In the same way, the profile of cell length was essentially the same during early development and during steady-state elongation. The results of a temporal analysis of whole-leaf elongation rate, carried out in the field and in the greenhouse at different light intensities were consistent with a time-invariant pattern of elongation. Whole-leaf relative elongation rate increased with time until the leaf reached 3040 mm length (although at different leaf ages depending on conditions), and declined afterwards. These results suggest that the patterns governing the elongation rate of a sector of a maize leaf are independent of the leaf developmental stage but depend on sector position only.
Key words: Leaf elongation, spatial pattern, relative elongation rate, cell length, monocotyledons.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Muller, G. Bourdais, B. Reidy, C. Bencivenni, A. Massonneau, P. Condamine, G. Rolland, G. Conejero, P. Rogowsky, and F. Tardieu Association of Specific Expansins with Growth in Maize Leaves Is Maintained under Environmental, Genetic, and Developmental Sources of Variation Plant Physiology, January 1, 2007; 143(1): 278 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ortega, S. C. Fry, and E. Taleisnik Why are Chloris gayana leaves shorter in salt-affected plants? Analyses in the elongation zone J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2006; 57(14): 3945 - 3952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. HILLIER, D. MAKOWSKI, and B. ANDRIEU Maximum Likelihood Inference and Bootstrap Methods for Plant Organ Growth via Multi-phase Kinetic Models and their Application to Maize Ann. Bot., July 1, 2005; 96(1): 137 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Reymond, B. Muller, and F. Tardieu Dealing with the genotypexenvironment interaction via a modelling approach: a comparison of QTLs of maize leaf length or width with QTLs of model parameters J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2004; 55(407): 2461 - 2472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Reymond, B. Muller, A. Leonardi, A. Charcosset, and F. Tardieu Combining Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis and an Ecophysiological Model to Analyze the Genetic Variability of the Responses of Maize Leaf Growth to Temperature and Water Deficit Plant Physiology, February 1, 2003; 131(2): 664 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. TUBEROSA, S. SALVI, M. C. SANGUINETI, P. LANDI, M. MACCAFERRI, and S. CONTI Mapping QTLs Regulating Morpho-physiological Traits and Yield: Case Studies, Shortcomings and Perspectives in Drought-stressed Maize Ann. Bot., June 15, 2002; 89(7): 941 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lafarge and F. Tardieu A model co-ordinating the elongation of all leaves of a sorghum cultivar was applied to both Mediterranean and Sahelian conditions J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2002; 53(369): 715 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


