Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 360, pp. 1555-1561, July 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Original Papers

Possible explanation of the disparity between the in vitro and in vivo measurements of Rubisco activity: a study in loblolly pine grown in elevated pCO2

Alistair Rogers1, David S. Ellsworth and Steven W. Humphries

Environmental Sciences Department, Building 490D, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000, USA

Rubisco activity can be measured using gas exchange (in vivo) or using in vitro methods. Commonly in vitro methods yield activities that are less than those obtained in vivo. Rubisco activity was measured both in vivo and in vitro using a spectrophotometric technique in mature Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) trees grown using free-air CO2 enrichment in elevated (56 Pa) and current (36 Pa) pCO2. In addition, for studies where both in vivo and in vitro values of Rubisco activity were reported net CO2 uptake rate (A) was modelled based on the in vivo and in vitro values of Rubisco activity reported in the literature. Both the modelling exercise and the experimental data showed that the in vitro values of Rubisco activity were insufficient to account for the observed values of A. A trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation of the protein from samples taken in parallel with those used for activity analysis was co-electrophoresed with the extract used for determining in vitro Rubisco activity. There was significantly more Rubisco present in the TCA precipitated samples, suggesting that the underestimation of Rubisco activity in vitro was attributable to an insufficient extraction of Rubisco protein prior to activity analysis. Correction of in vitro values to account for the under-represented Rubisco yielded mechanistically valid values for Rubisco activity. However, despite the low absolute values for Rubisco activity determined in vitro, the trends reported with CO2 treatment concurred with, and were of equal magnitude to, those observed in Rubisco activity measured in vivo.

Key words: Rubisco activity, elevated CO2.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
D. Wang, S. L. Naidu, A. R. Portis Jr, S. P. Moose, and S. P. Long
Can the cold tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthusxgiganteus relative to Zea mays be explained by differences in activities and thermal properties of Rubisco?
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1779 - 1787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
J. Galmes, H. Medrano, and J. Flexas
Acclimation of Rubisco specificity factor to drought in tobacco: discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo estimations
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2006; 57(14): 3659 - 3667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant Physiol.Home page
A. D.B. Leakey, M. Uribelarrea, E. A. Ainsworth, S. L. Naidu, A. Rogers, D. R. Ort, and S. P. Long
Photosynthesis, Productivity, and Yield of Maize Are Not Affected by Open-Air Elevation of CO2 Concentration in the Absence of Drought
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2006; 140(2): 779 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.