Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ning, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ning, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ning, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 362, pp. 1883-1891, September 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Original Papers

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter phosphorus relations of broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus L.) plants

Jianchang Ning and Jonathan R. Cumming1

Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA

Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus L.) is a dominant grass revegetating many abandoned coal-mined lands in West Virginia, USA. Residual soils on such sites are often characterized by low pH, low nutrients, and high aluminium. Experiments were conducted to assess the resistance of broomsedge to limited phosphorus (Pi) availability and to investigate the role that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi play in aiding plant growth under low Pi conditions. Pregerminated mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings were grown in a sand-culture system with nutrient solutions containing Pi concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 µM for 8 weeks. Non-mycorrhizal plants exhibited severe inhibition of growth under Pi limitation (<60 µM). Colonization by AM fungi (combined Glomus clarum Nicolson & Schenck and Gigaspora gigantea (Nicol. & Gerd.) Gerd. & Trappe) greatly enhanced host plant growth at low Pi concentrations, but did not benefit growth when Pi was readily available (100 µM). In comparison to non-mycorrhizal plants, mycorrhizal plants had higher phosphorus use efficiency at low Pi concentrations and maintained nearly constant tissue nutrient concentrations across the gradient of Pi concentrations investigated. Manganese (Mn) and sodium (Na) accumulated in shoots of non-mycorrhizal plants under Pi limitation. Mycorrhizal plants exhibited lower instantaneous Pi uptake rates and significantly lower Cmin values compared to non-mycorrhizal plants. These patterns suggest that the symbiotic association between broomsedge roots and AM fungi effectively maintains nutrient homeostasis through changes in physiological properties, including nutrient uptake, allocation and use. The mycorrhizal association is thus a major adaptation that allows broomsedge to become established on infertile mined lands.

Key words: Nutrient use efficiency, nutrient homeostasis, phosphate uptake.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Plant Physiol.Home page
K. Yi, Z. Wu, J. Zhou, L. Du, L. Guo, Y. Wu, and P. Wu
OsPTF1, a Novel Transcription Factor Involved in Tolerance to Phosphate Starvation in Rice
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2005; 138(4): 2087 - 2096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
J. R. Cumming and J. Ning
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance aluminium resistance of broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus L.)
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2003; 54(386): 1447 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.