Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linsenmair, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Boland, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linsenmair, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Boland, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Linsenmair, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Boland, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 363, pp. 2057-2065, October 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Original Papers

Adaptations to biotic and abiotic stress: Macaranga-ant plants optimize investment in biotic defence

K. Eduard Linsenmair1,5, Martin Heil1,4, Werner M. Kaiser2, Brigitte Fiala1, Thomas Koch3 and Wilhelm Boland3

1 Lehrstuhl für Tierökologie und Tropenbiologie (Zoologie III), Theodor-Boveri-Institut, Biozentrum, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany
2 Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie und Biophysik (Botanik I), Julius-von-Sachs-Institut, Julius-von-Sachs-Platz 2, D-97082 Würzburg, Germany
3 Max-Planck-Institut für chemische Ökologie, Carl Zeiss-Promenade 10, D-07745 Jena, Germany

Obligate ant plants (myrmecophytes) in the genus Macaranga produce energy- and nutrient-rich food bodies (FBs) to nourish mutualistic ants which live inside the plants. These defend their host against biotic stress caused by herbivores and pathogens. Facultative, ‘myrmecophilic’ interactions are based on the provision of FBs and/or extrafloral nectar (EFN) to defending insects that are attracted from the vicinity. FB production by the myrmecophyte, M. triloba, was limited by soil nutrient content under field conditions and was regulated according to the presence or absence of an ant colony. However, increased FB production promoted growth of the ant colonies living in the plants. Ant colony size is an important defensive trait and is negatively correlated to a plant's leaf damage. Similar regulatory patterns occurred in the EFN production of the myrmecophilic M. tanarius. Nectar accumulation resulting from the absence of consumers strongly decreased nectar flow, which increased again when consumers had access to the plant. EFN flow could be induced via the octadecanoid pathway. Leaf damage increased levels of endogenous jasmonic acid (JA), and both leaf damage and exogenous JA application increased EFN flow. Higher numbers of nectary visiting insects and lower numbers of herbivores were present on JA-treated plants. In the long run, this decreased leaf damage significantly. Ant food production is controlled by different regulatory mechanisms which ensure that costs are only incurred when counterbalanced by defensive effects of mutualistic insects.

Key words: Ant plant, anti-herbivore defence, mutualism, myrmecophyte, tropics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.