Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montagu, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Atwell, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montagu, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Atwell, B. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Montagu, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Atwell, B. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 364, pp. 2127-2133, November 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

The position of localized soil compaction determines root and subsequent shoot growth responses

Kelvin D. Montagu1,3, Jann P. Conroy1 and Brian J. Atwell2

1 Centre for Horticulture and Plant Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia
2 School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia

Plants growing in soils typically experience a mixture of loose and compact soil. The hypothesis that the proportion of a root system exposed to compact soil and/or the timing at which this exposure occurs determines shoot growth responses was tested. Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica cv. Greenbelt) seedlings were grown in pot experiments with compact, loose and localized soil compaction created by either horizontal (compact subsoils 75 or 150 mm below loose topsoil) or vertical (adjacent compact and loose columns of soil) configurations of loose (1.2 Mg m-3) and compact (1.8 Mg m-3) soil. Entirely compact soil reduced leaf area by up to 54%, relative to loose soil. When compaction was localized, only the vertical columns of compact and loose soil reduced leaf area (by 30%). Neither the proportion of roots in compact soil nor the timing of exposure could explain the differing shoot growth responses to localized soil compaction. Instead, the strong relationship between total root length and leaf area (r2=0.92) indicated that localized soil compaction reduced shoot growth only when it suppressed total root length. This occurred when isolated root axes of the same plant were exposed to vertical columns of compact and loose soil. When a single root axis grew through loose soil into either a shallow or deep compact subsoil, compensatory root growth in the loose soil maintained total root length and thus shoot growth was unaffected. These contrasting root systems responses to localized soil compaction may explain the variable shoot growth responses observed under heterogeneous conditions.

Key words: Compaction, mechanical impedance, root length, split-root, soil strength.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. W. Sweeney, M. B. Kirkham, and J. B. Sisson
Crop and Soil Response to Wheel-Track Compaction of a Claypan Soil
Agron. J., May 3, 2006; 98(3): 637 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. G. Bengough, M. F. Bransby, J. Hans, S. J. McKenna, T. J. Roberts, and T. A. Valentine
Root responses to soil physical conditions; growth dynamics from field to cell
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 437 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.