Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, A.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tang, A.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tang, A.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 53, No. 368, pp. 489-503, March 1, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Original Papers

Growth-induced water potentials and the growth of maize leaves

An-Ching Tang and John S. Boyer1

College of Marine Studies and College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE 19958, USA

Profiles of water potential ({Psi}w) were measured from the soil through the plant to the tip of growing leaves of fully established maize (Zea mays L.). The profiles revealed gradients in transpiration-induced {Psi}w extending upward along the transpiration path, and growth-induced {Psi}w extending radially between the veins in the elongating region of the leaf base. Water moving upward required a small gradient while that moving radially required a much larger gradient primarily because the protoxylem vessels were encased in many small, undifferentiated cells that were likely to act as a barrier to radial flow. Upon maturation, these small cells enlarged and some began to conduct water, probably decreasing the barrier. In the mature leaf, the growth-induced {Psi}w were absent but the transpiration-induced {Psi}w remained. When leaves were growing, the growth-induced {Psi}w moved water into the elongating cells during the day and night, and it shifted with changes in transpiration-induced {Psi}w. The shift involved solutes accumulating in the growing region. When water was withheld, the growth-induced {Psi}w disappeared and leaf elongation ceased even though turgor pressure was at its highest. Turgor was maintained by osmotic adjustment that doubled the osmotic potential of the elongating cells. If elongation resumed at night or with rewatering, the growth-induced {Psi}w reappeared. If pressure was applied to the soil/root system to cause guttation and re-establish the growth-induced {Psi}w, elongation resumed immediately. These findings support the hypothesis that the primary control of growth is the disappearance and reappearance of the growth-induced {Psi}w because the potential changed in the xylem and nearby cells, blocking or permitting radial water movement and thus blocking or permitting growth.

Key words: Gradients, leaf elongation, osmotic adjustment, osmotic potential, turgor, Zea mays L.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
A.-C. Tang and J. S. Boyer
Xylem tension affects growth-induced water potential and daily elongation of maize leaves
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2008; 59(4): 753 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
V. Volkov, C. Hachez, M. Moshelion, X. Draye, F. Chaumont, and W. Fricke
Water permeability differs between growing and non-growing barley leaf tissues
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2007; 58(3): 377 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
C. Vander Willigen, O. Postaire, C. Tournaire-Roux, Y. Boursiac, and C. Maurel
Expression and Inhibition of Aquaporins in Germinating Arabidopsis Seeds
Plant Cell Physiol., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1241 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. MAKELA, J. E. McLAUGHLIN, and J. S. BOYER
Imaging and Quantifying Carbohydrate Transport to the Developing Ovaries of Maize
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2005; 96(5): 939 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
W. Fricke, G. Akhiyarova, D. Veselov, and G. Kudoyarova
Rapid and tissue-specific changes in ABA and in growth rate in response to salinity in barley leaves
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2004; 55(399): 1115 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
A.-C. Tang and J. S. Boyer
Root pressurization affects growth-induced water potentials and growth in dehydrated maize leaves
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2003; 54(392): 2479 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
W. FRICKE
Biophysical Limitation of Cell Elongation in Cereal Leaves
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2002; 90(2): 157 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.