Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeuffroy, M.H.
Right arrow Articles by Ourry, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeuffroy, M.H.
Right arrow Articles by Ourry, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jeuffroy, M.H.
Right arrow Articles by Ourry, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 53, No. 370, pp. 809-823, April 15, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

Integrated physiological and agronomic modelling of N capture and use within the plant

M.H. Jeuffroy1,4, B. Ney2 and A. Ourry3

1 UMR INRA INA-PG Agronomie, 78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
2 UMR INRA-INA PG Environnement et Grandes cultures, 78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
3 UMR INRA UCBN, Physiologie et Biochimie Végétales, IRBA, Université, 14032 Caen Cedex, France

Today farmers have several constraints to take into account in managing their crops: (i) competitiveness: productivity must be maintained or increased whereas inputs must be decreased, (ii) the environmental consequences of cultural practices: pesticide and fertilizer use must be decreased, and (iii) product quality must be improved and nitrogen nutrition is an important factor in harvest quality. These new constraints sometimes conflict: maximum yield is often obtained with large amounts of N, increasing the risks of N leaching. The determination of rates and dates for nitrogen application must become more precise in this context. Tools are required for the forecasting of crop requirements, the diagnosis of N deficiencies during the crop cycle and breeding of new adapted varieties. Models and diagnosis indicators have been developed to meet these needs, but those relating to nitrogen are often based on empirical relationships. Moreover, the available models and indicators often fail to account for cultivar-specific responses. The improvement of agronomic tools and the breeding of new varieties adapted to new cropping systems should be based on a thorough understanding of the key metabolic processes involved, and the relative contributions of these processes to yield determination in conditions of fluctuating N supply. For both purposes, more information is required about plant and crop N economy. In this paper, the way in which N absorption and use within the plant and crop, plant responses to deficiencies and excesses of nitrogen are taken into account in major agronomic models is described first. The level of sophistication of the modules comprising these models depends on operational objectives. Secondly, the ways in which the most recent molecular plant physiology findings can, and indeed should, be integrated into models at the crop and crop cycle levels are described. The potential value of this approach for improving current agronomic models and diagnostic tools, and for breeding more efficient varieties is also discussed.

Key words: Agronomic models, nitrogen, plant physiology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
V. Letort, P. Mahe, P.-H. Cournede, P. de Reffye, and B. Courtois
Quantitative Genetics and Functional-Structural Plant Growth Models: Simulation of Quantitative Trait Loci Detection for Model Parameters and Application to Potential Yield Optimization
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1243 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
A. Martin, J. Lee, T. Kichey, D. Gerentes, M. Zivy, C. Tatout, F. Dubois, T. Balliau, B. Valot, M. Davanture, et al.
Two Cytosolic Glutamine Synthetase Isoforms of Maize Are Specifically Involved in the Control of Grain Production
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2006; 18(11): 3252 - 3274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. Bonesmo, G. Belanger, E. Charmley, R. Drapeau, D. B. McKenzie, R. Michaud, and G. F. Tremblay
Timothy Yield and Nutritive Value by the CATIMO Model: III. Validation for Eastern Canada
Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 32 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. Malagoli, P. Laine, E. Le Deunff, L. Rossato, B. Ney, and A. Ourry
Modeling Nitrogen Uptake in Oilseed Rape cv Capitol during a Growth Cycle Using Influx Kinetics of Root Nitrate Transport Systems and Field Experimental Data
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2004; 134(1): 388 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.