Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lancashire, J.R.
Right arrow Articles by Ennos, A.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lancashire, J.R.
Right arrow Articles by Ennos, A.R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lancashire, J.R.
Right arrow Articles by Ennos, A.R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 53, No. 373, pp. 1485-1493, June 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

Modelling the hydrodynamic resistance of bordered pits

J.R. Lancashire and A.R. Ennos1

School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, 3.614 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

Previous studies of the hydrodynamics of plant stems have shown that resistance to flow through bordered pits on the side walls of tracheids makes up a significant proportion of their total resistance, and that this proportion increases with tracheid diameter. This suggests a possible reason why tracheids with a diameter above around 100 µm have failed to evolve. This possibility has been investigated by obtaining an estimate for the resistance of a single pit, and incorporating it into analytical models of tracheid resistance and wood resistivity. The hydrodynamic resistance of the bordered pits of Tsuga canadensis was investigated using large-scale physical models. The importance of individual components of the pit were investigated by comparing the resistance of models with different pore sizes in their pit membrane, and with or without the torus and border. The estimate for the resistance of a real bordered pit was 1.70x1015 Pa s m-3. Resistance of pits varied with morphology as might be predicted; the resistance was inversely proportional to the pore size to the power of 0.715; removing the torus reduced resistance by 28%, while removal of the torus and border together reduced it by 72%. It was estimated that in a ‘typical tracheid’ pit resistance should account for 29% of the total. Incorporating the results into the model for the resistivity of wood showed that resistivity should fall as tracheid diameter increases. However, to minimize resistance wider tracheids would also need to be proportionally much longer. It is suggested that the diameter of tracheids in conifers is limited by upper limits to cell length or cell volume. This limitation is avoided by angiosperms because they can digest away the ends of their cells to produce long, wide vessels composed of many short cells.

Key words: Bordered pit, flow, models, tracheids.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
H. Cochard, S. Herbette, E. Hernandez, T. Holtta, and M. Mencuccini
The effects of sap ionic composition on xylem vulnerability to cavitation
J. Exp. Bot., October 19, 2009; (2009) erp298v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
J. P. Wilson, A. H. Knoll, N. M. Holbrook, and C. R. Marshall
Modeling fluid flow in Medullosa, an anatomically unusual Carboniferous seed plant
Paleobiology, December 1, 2008; 34(4): 472 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-C. Domec, B. Lachenbruch, F. C. Meinzer, D. R. Woodruff, J. M. Warren, and K. A. McCulloh
Maximum height in a conifer is associated with conflicting requirements for xylem design
PNAS, August 19, 2008; 105(33): 12069 - 12074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J.-C. Domec, B. Lachenbruch, and F. C. Meinzer
Bordered pit structure and function determine spatial patterns of air-seeding thresholds in xylem of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii; Pinaceae) trees
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2006; 93(11): 1588 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. S. Sperry, U. G. Hacke, and J. Pittermann
Size and function in conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1490 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Pittermann, J. S. Sperry, U. G. Hacke, J. K. Wheeler, and E. H. Sikkema
Inter-tracheid pitting and the hydraulic efficiency of conifer wood: the role of tracheid allometry and cavitation protection
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2006; 93(9): 1265 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
B. Choat, T. W. Brodie, A. R. Cobb, M. A. Zwieniecki, and N. M. Holbrook
Direct measurements of intervessel pit membrane hydraulic resistance in two angiosperm tree species
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2006; 93(7): 993 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. S. Sperry and U. G. Hacke
Analysis of circular bordered pit function I. Angiosperm vessels with homogenous pit membranes
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 369 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
U. G. Hacke, J. S. Sperry, and J. Pittermann
Analysis of circular bordered pit function II. Gymnosperm tracheids with torus-margo pit membranes
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 386 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. S. Sperry, V. Stiller, and U. G. Hacke
Xylem Hydraulics and the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum: Opportunities and Unresolved Issues
Agron. J., November 1, 2003; 95(6): 1362 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.