Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fravolini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fravolini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fravolini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 53, No. 378, pp. 2261-2269, November 1, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Carbon isotope discrimination and bundle sheath leakiness in three C4 subtypes grown under variable nitrogen, water and atmospheric CO2 supply

Received 6 November 2001; Accepted 4 July 2002

A. Fravolini3,1, D. G. Williams1 and T. L. Thompson2

1 School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
2 Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, PO Box 210038, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: alefravo{at}u.arizona.edu

The changes in composition and productivity of semi-arid C4 grassland, anticipated with rising atmospheric CO2, will depend on soil water and nutrient availability. The interactive effects of soil resource limitation and elevated CO2 on these grasses, furthermore, may vary among C4 biochemical subtypes (NADP-ME, NAD-ME, PCK) that differ in bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}) responses to drought and nitrogen supply. To address C4 subtype responses to soil resource gradients, the carbon isotope discrimination ({Delta}), bundle sheath leakiness ({Phi}), leaf gas exchange (A, gs, ci/ca) and above-ground biomass accumulation were measured on three dominant grasses of semi-desert grassland in south-eastern Arizona. Bouteloua curtipendula (PCK), Aristida glabrata (NADP-ME) and the non-native Eragrostis lehmanniana (NAD-ME) were grown in controlled-environment chambers from seed under a complete, multi-factorial combination of present ambient (370 ppm) and elevated (690 ppm) CO2 concentration and under high and low water and nitrogen supply. E. lehmanniana (NAD-ME) had the highest photosynthetic rate (A) and lowest {Phi} compared to the other two grasses when grown under low nitrogen and water availability. However, favourable water and nitrogen supply and elevated atmospheric CO2 enhanced photosynthetic performance and above-ground biomass production of B. curtipendula (PCK) to a greater extent than in A. glabrata and E. lehmanniana. Contrary to pre vious studies, {Phi} and {Delta} in the NADP-ME subtype (A. glabrata) were most affected by changing environmental conditions compared to the other subtypes; deviations from the classic NADP-ME anatomy in Aristida could have accounted for this result. Overall, response of semi-arid grasslands to rising atmospheric CO2 may depend more on species-specific responses to drought and nitrogen limitation than on general C4 subtype responses.

Key words: Key words: Bundle sheath leakiness, carbon isotope discrimination, CO2 supply, grasses, nitrogen, semi-arid, water.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.