Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Battey, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Battey, N. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Battey, N. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 383, pp. 605-608, February 1, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

February–constructing a corymb

Nicholas H. Battey1

1 Plant Science Laboratories, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AS, UK

According to Robert Graves' mythological interpretation of the seasonal cycle, February is associated with the rowan tree. Corymb is the systematic name for the rowan inflorescence that produces the distinctive group of orange berries. The corymb, a gently domed cluster, is related to a panicle and an anthela, differing from them in the extent of upgrowth of the inflorescence branches. Soon, molecular biology will provide a gene-driven description of each inflorescence structure. This advance illustrates the progress of science: previous issues of inflorescence classification are not resolved, but a new system, reflecting the availability of new technology, is established. The artist and poet William Blake remarked that it is better to invent a system, than be enslaved by that of another. He also railed against science for its improper restriction to the imagination.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.