Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 383, pp. 845-849,
February 1, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press
The effects of air flow and stem flexure on the mechanical and hydraulic properties of the stems of sunflowers Helianthus annuus L.
Received 22 July 2002; Accepted 8 October 2002
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, 3.614 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +44 (0)161 275 3848. E-mail: Roland.Ennos{at}man.ac.uk
Many studies have shown that wind affects plant development, causing them to develop shorter and usually stronger stems. Many of these effects have been shown to be due to a response to mechanical flexing of the stem which is known as thigmomorphogenesis. However, it is not known how wind affects the hydraulic properties of stems, nor have the effects of air flow past leaves been examined in isolation from mechanical flexing. This study, therefore, used a factorial experiment to distinguish between the effects of stem flexing and air flow, and examined the morphology, hydraulics and mechanics of developing sunflowers Helianthus annuus. It was found that flexure and air flow had opposite effects on several aspects of development; air flow increased plant height and length-specific stem hydraulic conductivity, kh, and reduced stem rigidity and strength, while flexing did the reverse. There was also a clear trade-off between hydraulic and mechanical capability: as one increased the other decreased. A plants response to wind must, therefore, be a complex response to at least two different stimuli and this might help explain why it varies with species and environment.
Key words: Hydraulic conductivity, mechanics, plant development, thigmomorphogenesis, wind.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Garcia-Verdugo, C. Granado-Yela, E. Manrique, R. Rubio de Casas, and L. Balaguer Phenotypic plasticity and integration across the canopy of Olea europaea subsp. guanchica (Oleaceae) in populations with different wind exposures Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2009; 96(8): 1454 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Coutand, C. Dupraz, G. Jaouen, S. Ploquin, and B. Adam Mechanical Stimuli Regulate the Allocation of Biomass in Trees: Demonstration with Young Prunus avium Trees Ann. Bot., June 1, 2008; 101(9): 1421 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Hee. Han, C. Coutand, H. Cochard, C. Trottier, and P.-E. Lauri Effects of shoot bending on lateral fate and hydraulics: invariant and changing traits across five apple genotypes J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2007; 58(13): 3537 - 3547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Read and A. Stokes Plant biomechanics in an ecological context Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1546 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Murren and M. Pigliucci Morphological responses to simulated wind in the genus Brassica (Brassicaceae): allopolyploids and their parental species Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2005; 92(5): 810 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


