Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on March 31, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
54/386/1461    most recent
erg153v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staddon, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fitter, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staddon, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fitter, A. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Staddon, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fitter, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 386, pp. 1461-1469, May 1, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

The speed of soil carbon throughput in an upland grassland is increased by liming

Received 12 December 2002; Accepted 17 February 2003

Philip L. Staddon4,1, Nick Ostle2, Lorna A. Dawson3 and Alastair H. Fitter1

1 Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK
2 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Merlewood Research Station, Grange-over-Sands, Cumbria LA11 6JU, UK
3 Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK

4 Present address and to whom correspondence should be sent: Risø National Laboratory, Plant Research Department, Building 313, Postbox 49, Roskilde, DK-4000, Denmark. Fax: +45 4677 4122. E-mail: philip.louis.staddon{at}risoe.dk

In situ 13C pulse labelling was used to measure the temporal and spatial carbon flow through an upland grassland. The label was delivered as 13C-CO2 to vegetation in three replicate plots in each of two treatments: control and lime addition. Harvests occurred over a two month period and samples were taken along transects away from the label delivery area. The 13C concentration of shoot, root, bulk soil, and soil-respired CO2 was measured. There was no difference in the biomass and 13C concentration of shoot and root material for the control and lime treatments meaning that the amount of 13C-CO2 assimilated by the vegetation and translocated below ground was the same in both treatments. The 13C concentration of the bulk soil was lower in the lime treatment than in the control and, conversely, the 13C concentration of the soil-respired CO2 was higher in the lime. Unlike the difference in bulk soil 13C concentration between treatments, the difference in the 13C concentration of the soil-respired CO2 was obvious only at the delivery site and primarily within 1 d after labelling. An observed increase in the abundance of mycorrhizal fungi in the lime treatment was a possible cause for this faster carbon throughput. The potential key role of mycorrhizas in the soil carbon cycle is discussed. The importance of a better understanding of soil processes, especially biological ones, in relation to the global carbon cycle and environmental change is highlighted.

Key words: 13C-CO2, extraradical mycorrhizal hyphae, pulse labelling, root length colonized, soil carbon storage.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
P. A. Olsson, I. M. van Aarle, M. E. Gavito, P. Bengtson, and G. Bengtsson
13C Incorporation into Signature Fatty Acids as an Assay for Carbon Allocation in Arbuscular Mycorrhiza
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 1, 2005; 71(5): 2592 - 2599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.