JXB Advance Access originally published online on July 28, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 390, pp. 2105-2109,
September 1, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Root cap removal increases root penetration resistance in maize (Zea mays L.)
Received 28 February 2003; Accepted 29 May 2003
1 Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
3 Scottish Crop Research Institute, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +81 52 789 4012. E-mail: miijima{at}agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp
The root cap assists the passage of the root through soil by means of its slimy mucilage secretion and by the sloughing of its outer cells. The root penetration resistance of decapped primary roots of maize (Zea mays L. cv. Mephisto) was compared with that of intact roots in loose (dry bulk density 1.0 g cm3; penetration resistance 0.06 MPa) and compact soil (1.4 g cm3; penetration resistance 1.0 MPa), to evaluate the contribution of the cap to decreasing the impedance to root growth. Root elongation rate and diameter were the same for decapped and intact roots when the plants were grown in loose soil. In compacted soil, however, the elongation rate of decapped roots was only about half that of intact roots, whilst the diameter was 30% larger. Root penetration resistances of intact and decapped seminal axis were 0.31 and 0.52 MPa, respectively, when the roots were grown in compacted soil. These results indicated that the presence of a root cap alleviates much of the mechanical impedance to root penetration, and enables roots to grow faster in compacted soils.
Key words: Border cell, decapping, mucilage, root cap, root growth pressure, soil compaction.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. E. Odell, M. R. Dumlao, D. Samar, and W. K. Silk Stage-dependent border cell and carbon flow from roots to rhizosphere Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2008; 95(4): 441 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. V. Badri, V. M. Loyola-Vargas, C. D. Broeckling, C. De-la-Pena, M. Jasinski, D. Santelia, E. Martinoia, L. W. Sumner, L. M. Banta, F. Stermitz, et al. Altered Profile of Secondary Metabolites in the Root Exudates of Arabidopsis ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Mutants Plant Physiology, February 1, 2008; 146(2): 762 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Bengough, M. F. Bransby, J. Hans, S. J. McKenna, T. J. Roberts, and T. A. Valentine Root responses to soil physical conditions; growth dynamics from field to cell J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 437 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. IIJIMA, T. HIGUCHI, and P. W. BARLOW Contribution of Root Cap Mucilage and Presence of an Intact Root Cap in Maize (Zea mays) to the Reduction of Soil Mechanical Impedance Ann. Bot., September 1, 2004; 94(3): 473 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



