Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 392, pp. 2403-2417,
November 1, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies
Received 24 April 2003; Accepted 9 July 2003
INRA, Forest Ecology and Ecophysiology Unit, Phytoecology Team, F-54 280 Champenoux, France
* Fax: +33 3 83 39 40 22. E-mail: breda{at}nancy.inra.fr
Leaf area index (LAI) is the total one-sided area of leaf tissue per unit ground surface area. It is a key parameter in ecophysiology, especially for scaling up the gas exchange from leaf to canopy level. It characterizes the canopyatmosphere interface, where most of the energy fluxes exchange. It is also one of the most difficult to quantify properly, owing to large spatial and temporal variability. Many methods have been developed to quantify LAI from the ground and some of them are also suitable for describing other structural parameters of the canopy. This paper reviews the direct and indirect methods, the required instruments, their advantages, disadvantages and accuracy of the results. Analysis of the literature shows that most cross-validations between direct and indirect methods have pointed to a significant underestimation of LAI with the latter techniques, especially in forest stands. The two main causes for the discrepancy, clumping and contribution of stem and branches, are discussed and some recent theoretical or technical solutions are presented as potential improvements to reduce bias or discrepancies. The accuracy, sampling strategy and spatial validity of the LAI measurements have to be assessed for quality assurance of both the measurement and the modelling purposes of all the LAI-dependent ecophysiological and biophysical processes of canopies.
Key words: Clumping, error, leaf area index, plant area index, sampling.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zou, G. Yan, L. Zhu, and W. Zhang Woody-to-total area ratio determination with a multispectral canopy imager Tree Physiol, August 1, 2009; 29(8): 1069 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Sone, K. Saito, and K. Futakuchi Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating Leaf Area Index of Upland Rice Cultivars Crop Sci., June 26, 2009; 49(4): 1438 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L.B. Jupp, D.S. Culvenor, J.L. Lovell, G.J. Newnham, A.H. Strahler, and C.E. Woodcock Estimating forest LAI profiles and structural parameters using a ground-based laser called 'Echidna(R) Tree Physiol, February 1, 2009; 29(2): 171 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hosoi and K. Omasa Factors contributing to accuracy in the estimation of the woody canopy leaf area density profile using 3D portable lidar imaging J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2007; 58(12): 3463 - 3473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. EWERT Modelling Plant Responses to Elevated CO2: How Important is Leaf Area Index? Ann. Bot., June 1, 2004; 93(6): 619 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



