Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chhun, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ichii, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chhun, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ichii, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chhun, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ichii, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 393, pp. 2701-2708, December 1, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Interaction between two auxin-resistant mutants and their effects on lateral root formation in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Received 7 July 2003; Accepted 4 September 2003

Tory Chhun*,1, Shin Taketa1, Seiji Tsurumi2 and Masahiko Ichii1

1 Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki, Kagawa 761-0795, Japan
2 Radioisotope Research Center, Kobe University, Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed: Fax: +81 87 891 3127. E-mail: s01x604{at}stmail.ag.kagawa-u.ac.jp

Since root elongation is very sensitive to auxin, screening for reduced inhibition in root elongation has been an important method for the detection of auxin-resistant mutants. Two recessive auxin-resistant lines of rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica cv. IR8), arm1 and arm2, have been isolated by screening for resistance to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). arm1 displays a variety of morphological defects including reduced lateral root formation, increased seminal root elongation, reduced root diameter, and impaired xylem development in roots, while the arm2 phenotype is almost similar to wild-type IR8 except for a slightly reduced lateral root formation, impaired xylem development in roots and an enhanced plant height. Although the growth of arm2 roots exhibited a resistance to 2,4-D, it was sensitive to 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) as the wild type. At the same time, the arm2 roots showed a reduced [14C]2,4-D uptake while uptake of [3H]NAA was normal, suggesting that the resistance to 2,4-D of arm2 roots is due to a defect in 2,4-D uptake. To investigate the possible interaction between arm1 and arm2 genes, a double mutant has been constructed. The roots of arm1 arm2 double mutant were more resistant to 2,4-D and formed fewer lateral roots than those of either single mutant, suggesting that the two genes show synergistic effects with respect to both auxin response and lateral root formation. By contrast, all these mutants displayed the normal gravitropic response in roots, as did the wild-type plants. Taken together, Arm1 and Arm2 genes seem to function in different processes in the auxin-response pathways leading to lateral root formation.

Key words: Auxin influx, auxin-resistant mutant, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, gravitropic response, lateral root formation, rice root, root elongation, xylem development.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
T. Chhun, S. Taketa, M. Ichii, and S. Tsurumi
Involvement of ARM2 in the Uptake of Indole-3-butyric Acid in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Roots
Plant Cell Physiol., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1161 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. W. WOODWARD and B. BARTEL
Auxin: Regulation, Action, and Interaction
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2005; 95(5): 707 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.