Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on April 8, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/399/1071    most recent
erh115v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barley, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barley, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barley, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 55, No. 399, pp. 1071-1078, May 1, 2004
© 2004 Oxford University Press

Regulation of Growth, Development and Whole Organism Physiology

Why hypocotyl extension mutants need to be characterized at the cell level: a case study of axr3-1

Received 21 July 2003; Accepted 26 January 2004

K. Barley*

Department of Biology, Plant Laboratory, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5YW, UK

* E-mail: drf1{at}york.ac.uk

Since the discovery of auxin, a debate has taken place as to whether the auxin distribution in elongating organs can account for the distinctive cell elongation profiles that have been found. In an attempt to address this important issue, the elongation profiles of cells have been compared in the hypocotyls of wild-type and auxin-hypersensitive axr3-1 Arabidopsis Columbia ecotype seedlings. Clear differences in cell elongation profiles were found in the two types of seedling, whether they were light- or dark-grown. However, it was not possible unambiguously to ascribe the cell elongation profile differences to the proposition that the axr3-1 mutation causes the hypocotyl to be hypersensitive to auxin. The possibility that the abnormal hypocotyl elongation profile of the mutant was a secondary effect, consequent on a more fundamental effect of the axr3-1 mutation, is considered. It is clear from this study that cell elongation and its control needs to be studied at the cell, and not the organ, level. To characterize a mutant as having a short, or long, hypocotyl is inadequate. To determine which factors control the timing and the magnitude of cell elongation requires the demonstration of correlations between the growth rate of cells and their content of regulating substances or their sensitivity to that substance. Studies of the cell elongation profiles of the many hypocotyl length mutants could also be a very effective means of probing the co-ordination of root and shoot elongation.

Key words: Arabidopsis, dark, epidermal cell elongation, growth rate, hypocotyl, light, nutrition, spatial, temporal.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.