Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on December 13, 2004
Journal of Experimental Botany 2005 56(410):245-254; doi:10.1093/jxb/eri043
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/410/245    most recent
eri043v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodacre, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodacre, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Goodacre, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 56, No. 410, © Society for Experimental Biology 2004; all rights reserved

RESEARCH PAPER

Making sense of the metabolome using evolutionary computation: seeing the wood with the trees

Royston Goodacre*

School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, PO Box 88, Sackville Street, Manchester M60 1QD, UK

* E-mail: Roy.Goodacre{at}manchester.ac.uk

One should perhaps start off by asking the question, ‘But what wood is it we want to see?’ There are so many trees that make up the wood; within a post-genomics context, genes, transcripts, proteins, and metabolites are the more tangible ones. Rather than studying these components in isolation, a more holistic approach is to unravel the interactions between the myriad of subcellular components and this is vital to systems biology. Moreover, this will help define the phenotype of the organism under investigation. Metabolomics is complementary to transcriptomics and proteomics, and despite the immense metabolite diversity observed in plants, metabolomics has been embraced by the plant community and in particular for studying metabolic networks. Whilst post-genomic science is producing vast data torrents, it is well known that data do not equal knowledge and so the extraction of the most meaningful parts of these data is key to the generation of useful new knowledge. A metabolomics experiment is guaranteed to generate thousands of data points (e.g. samples multiplied by the levels of particular metabolites) of which only a handful might be needed to describe the problem adequately. Evolutionary computational-based methods such as genetic algorithms and genetic programming are ideal strategies for mining such high-dimensional data to generate useful relationships, rules, and predictions. This article describes these techniques and highlights their usefulness within metabolomics.

Key words: Evolutionary computation, metabolomics, subcellular components, systems biology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.