JXB Advance Access originally published online on January 10, 2005
Journal of Experimental Botany 2005 56(412):777-786; doi:10.1093/jxb/eri063
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH PAPER |
Adaptations to increasing hydraulic stress: morphology, hydrodynamics and fitness of two higher aquatic plant species
UMR CNRS 5023, Ecology of Fluvial Hydrosystems, Université Claude Bernard–Lyon I, F-69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +33 4 72 43 11 41. E-mail: sara{at}avosnes.univ-lyon1.fr
Sessile organisms often exhibit morphological changes in response to permanent exposure to mechanical stimulation (wind or water movements). The adaptive value of these morphological changes (hydrodynamic performance and consequences on fitness) has not been studied extensively, particularly for higher plants submitted to flow stress. The aim was to determine the adaptive value of morphological patterns observed within two higher aquatic plant species, Berula erecta and Mentha aquatica, growing along a natural flow stress gradient. The hydrodynamic ability of each ramet was investigated through quantitative variables (drag coefficient and E-value). Fitness-related traits based on vegetative growth and clonal multiplication were assessed for each individual. For both species, the drag coefficient and the E-value were explained only to a limited extent by the morphological traits used. B. erecta exhibited a reduction in size and low overall plant drag at higher flow velocities, despite high drag values relative to leaf area, due to a low flexibility. The plants maintained their fitness, at least in part, through biomass reallocation: one tall ramet at low velocity, but shorter individuals with many interconnected stolons when flow velocity increased. For M. aquatica, morphological differences along the velocity gradient did not lead to greater hydrodynamic performance. Plant size increased with increasing velocities, suggesting the indirect effects of current favouring growth in high velocities. The fitness-related traits did not demonstrate lower plant fitness for high velocities. Different developmental constraints linked to plant morphology and trade-offs between major plant functions probably lead to different plant responses to flow stress.
Key words: Drag, ecomorphology, fitness, hydraulic ecology, hydrodynamic performance, mechanical constraint, morphological adaptation, submerged aquatic vegetation
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Puijalon, J.-P. Lena, and G. Bornette Interactive Effects of Nutrient and Mechanical Stresses on Plant Morphology Ann. Bot., November 1, 2007; 100(6): 1297 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. W. Telewski A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1466 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Puijalon and G. Bornette Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical stress: biomass partitioning and clonal growth of an aquatic plant species Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1090 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|