JXB Advance Access originally published online on August 1, 2005
Journal of Experimental Botany 2005 56(419):2275-2285; doi:10.1093/jxb/eri247
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPINION PAPER |
How do cell walls regulate plant growth?
School of Biosciences, University of Westminster, 115 New Cavendish Street, London W1W 6UW, UK
* Fax: +44 (0)20 7911 5800, ext 5087. E-mail: thompss{at}wmin.ac.uk
The cell wall of growing plant tissues has frequently been interpreted in terms of inextensible cellulose microfibrils ‘tethered’ by hemicellulose polymers attached to the microfibril surface by hydrogen bonds, with growth occurring when tethers are broken or ‘peeled’ off the microfibril surface by expansins. This has sometimes been described as the ‘sticky network’ model. In this paper, a number of theoretical difficulties with this model, and discrepancies between predicted behaviour and observations by a number of researchers, are noted. (i) Predictions of cell wall moduli, based upon the sticky network model, suggest that the cell wall should be much weaker than is observed. (ii) The maximum hydrogen bond energy between tethers and microfibrils is less than the work done in expansion and therefore breakage of such hydrogen bonds is unlikely to limit growth. (iii) Composites of bacterial cellulose with xyloglucan are weaker than pellicles of pure cellulose so that it seems unlikely that hemicelluloses bind the microfibrils together. (iv) Calcium chelators promote creep of plant material in a similar way to expansins. (v) Reduced relative ‘permittivities’ inhibit the contraction of cell wall material when an applied stress is decreased. Revisions of the sticky network model that might address these issues are considered, as are alternatives including a model of cell wall biophysics in which cell wall polymers act as ‘scaffolds’ to regulate the space available for microfibril movement. Experiments that support the latter hypothesis, by demonstrating that reducing cell wall free volume decreases extensibility, are briefly described.
Key words: Cell wall, expansins, plant growth, rheology
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Suslov, J.-P. Verbelen, and K. Vissenberg Onion epidermis as a new model to study the control of growth anisotropy in higher plants J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2009; 60(14): 4175 - 4187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Burgert and P. Fratzl Plants control the properties and actuation of their organs through the orientation of cellulose fibrils in their cell walls Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 49(1): 69 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Cavalier, O. Lerouxel, L. Neumetzler, K. Yamauchi, A. Reinecke, G. Freshour, O. A. Zabotina, M. G. Hahn, I. Burgert, M. Pauly, et al. Disrupting Two Arabidopsis thaliana Xylosyltransferase Genes Results in Plants Deficient in Xyloglucan, a Major Primary Cell Wall Component PLANT CELL, June 1, 2008; 20(6): 1519 - 1537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. A. Eckardt Role of Xyloglucan in Primary Cell Walls PLANT CELL, June 1, 2008; 20(6): 1421 - 1422. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. S. Thompson Space and Time in the Plant Cell Wall: Relationships between Cell Type, Cell Wall Rheology and Cell Function Ann. Bot., January 1, 2008; 101(2): 203 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. S. T. Van Sandt, D. Suslov, J.-P. Verbelen, and K. Vissenberg Xyloglucan Endotransglucosylase Activity Loosens a Plant Cell Wall Ann. Bot., December 1, 2007; 100(7): 1467 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Proseus and J. S. Boyer Tension required for pectate chemistry to control growth in Chara corallina J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2007; 58(15-16): 4283 - 4292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Evered, B. Majevadia, and D. S. Thompson Cell wall water content has a direct effect on extensibility in growing hypocotyls of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) J. Exp. Bot., September 26, 2007; (2007) erm183v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. M. Gloster, F. M. Ibatullin, K. Macauley, J. M. Eklof, S. Roberts, J. P. Turkenburg, M. E. Bjornvad, P. L. Jorgensen, S. Danielsen, K. S. Johansen, et al. Characterization and Three-dimensional Structures of Two Distinct Bacterial Xyloglucanases from Families GH5 and GH12 J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2007; 282(26): 19177 - 19189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Baumann, J. M. Eklof, G. Michel, A. M. Kallas, T. T. Teeri, M. Czjzek, and H. Brumer III Structural Evidence for the Evolution of Xyloglucanase Activity from Xyloglucan Endo-Transglycosylases: Biological Implications for Cell Wall Metabolism PLANT CELL, June 1, 2007; 19(6): 1947 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. C. Gunnarsson, Q. Zhou, C. Montanier, E. N. Karlsson, H. Brumer III, and M. Ohlin Engineered xyloglucan specificity in a carbohydrate-binding module Glycobiology, December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1171 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Burgert Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1391 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Martinez-Fleites, C. I. P. D. Guerreiro, M. J. Baumann, E. J. Taylor, J. A. M. Prates, L. M. A. Ferreira, C. M. G. A. Fontes, H. Brumer, and G. J. Davies Crystal Structures of Clostridium thermocellum Xyloglucanase, XGH74A, Reveal the Structural Basis for Xyloglucan Recognition and Degradation J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2006; 281(34): 24922 - 24933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|