Skip Navigation

Journal of Experimental Botany 2005 56(422):3029-3031; doi:10.1093/jxb/eri320
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Battey, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Simmonds, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Battey, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Simmonds, P. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Battey, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Simmonds, P. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

PAPER

Phylloxera and the grapevine: a sense of common purpose?

Nicholas H. Battey* and Paul E. Simmonds

School of Biological Sciences, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AS, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +44 118 3788160. E-mail: n.h.battey{at}reading.ac.uk

The purpose of life is its continuation: survival is the reason things live. Here we explore this ‘basic’ of biology, by reference to the extraordinary life-cycle of the aphid-like pest phylloxera, and the complexity of its relationship with its host the grapevine. The effort and ingenuity that phylloxera employs to continue itself leads to a doubt that survival alone is sufficient reason. It has frequently been suggested that the reduction of life to a catalogue of facts (by science) creates this doubt, because it robs existence of its essence (which is something other than its mechanics). The part that science is said to steal is what Robert Pirsig calls Quality—the harmonious balance of things. Pirsig seems to imply that this is something inherent in things—and independent from us. A more mundane explanation is that the difference between facts and the complete reality is us—the tendency of mind to connect freely between different kinds of information. This possibility is briefly illustrated here by a myth based on the facts of phylloxera.

Key words: Evolution, grapevine, Phylloxera, plant–insect interactions


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Comment: grape phylloxera and the grapevine: searching for the science
Douglas A Downie
Journal of Experimental Botany, 9 Aug 2006 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.