Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on May 23, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany 2006 57(10):2183-2192; doi:10.1093/jxb/erj177
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/10/2183    most recent
erj177v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suslov, D
Right arrow Articles by Verbelen, J-P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suslov, D
Right arrow Articles by Verbelen, J-P
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Suslov, D
Right arrow Articles by Verbelen, J-P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

Cellulose orientation determines mechanical anisotropy in onion epidermis cell walls

D Suslov and J-P Verbelen*

Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Jean-Pierre.Verbelen{at}ua.ac.be

The role of cellulose microfibril orientation in determining cell wall mechanical anisotropy and in the control of the wall plastic versus elastic properties was studied in the adaxial epidermis of onion bulb scales using the constant-load (creep) test. The mean or net cellulose orientation in the outer periclinal wall of the epidermis was parallel to the long axis of the cells. In vitro cell wall extensibility was 30–90% higher in the direction perpendicular to the net microfibril orientation than parallel to it. This was the case for the size of the initial deformation occurring just after the load application and for the rate of time-dependent creep. Loading/unloading experiments confirmed the presence of a real irreversible component in cell wall extension. The plastic component of the time-dependent deformation was higher perpendicular to the net cellulose orientation than parallel to it. An acid buffer (pH 4.5) increased the creep rate by 25–30% but this response was not related to cellulose orientation. The present data provide direct evidence that the net orientation of cellulose microfibrils confers mechanical anisotropy to the walls of seed plants, a characteristic that may be relevant to understanding anisotropic cell growth.

Key words: Allium, cell wall extensibility, cellulose orientation, confocal microscopy, creep test


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
V. de Micco, G. Aronne, J.-P. Joseleau, and K. Ruel
Xylem Development and Cell Wall Changes of Soybean Seedlings Grown in Space
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(5): 661 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
V. S. T. Van Sandt, D. Suslov, J.-P. Verbelen, and K. Vissenberg
Xyloglucan Endotransglucosylase Activity Loosens a Plant Cell Wall
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2007; 100(7): 1467 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
I. Burgert
Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1391 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.