Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on August 7, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany 2006 57(12):2993-3006; doi:10.1093/jxb/erl058
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/12/2993    most recent
erl058v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heber, U.
Right arrow Articles by Shuvalov, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heber, U.
Right arrow Articles by Shuvalov, V. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heber, U.
Right arrow Articles by Shuvalov, V. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

Thermal energy dissipation in reaction centres and in the antenna of photosystem II protects desiccated poikilohydric mosses against photo-oxidation

Ulrich Heber1,*, Wolfgang Bilger2 and Vladimir A. Shuvalov3

1Julius-von-Sachs-Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Würzburg, Julius-von-Sachs-Platz 2, D-97082 Würzburg, Germany
2Botanical Institute, University of Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
3Institute of Basic Biological Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142292 Pushchino-na-Oke, Moscow Region, and Laboratory of Biophysics, Belozersky Institute of Chemical and Physical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Russia

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: heber{at}botanik.uni-wuerzburg.de

Seasonal differences have been observed in the ability of desiccated mosses to dissipate absorbed light energy harmlessly into heat. During the dry summer season desiccation-tolerant mosses were more protected against photo-oxidative damage in the dry state than during the more humid winter season. Investigation of the differences revealed that phototolerance could be acquired or lost even under laboratory conditions. When a desiccated poikilohydric moss such as Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus is in the photosensitive state, the primary quinone, QA, in the reaction centre of photosystem II is readily reduced even by low intensity illumination as indicated by reversibly increased chlorophyll fluorescence. No such reduction is observed even under strong illumination in desiccated mosses after phototolerance has been acquired. In this state, reductive charge stabilization is replaced by energy dissipation. As a consequence, chlorophyll fluorescence is quenched. Different mechanisms are responsible for quenching. One is based on the presence of zeaxanthin provided drying occurs in the light. This mechanism is known to be controlled by a protonation reaction which is based on proton-coupled electron transport while the moss is still hydrated. Another mechanism which also requires light for activation, but no protonation, is activated during desiccation. While water is slowly lost, fluorescence is quenched. In this situation, an absorption band formed at 800 nm in the light is stabilized. It loses reversibility on darkening. Comparable kinetics of fluorescence quenching and 800 nm signals as well as the linear relationship between non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ) and loss of stable charge separation in photosystem II reaction centres suggested that desiccation-induced quenching is a property of photosystem II reaction centres. During desiccation, quenchers accumulate which are stable in the absence of water but revert to non-quenching molecular species on hydration. Together with zeaxanthin-dependent energy dissipation, desiccation-induced thermal energy dissipation protects desiccated poikilohydric mosses against photo-oxidation, ensuring survival during drought periods.

Key words: Chlorophyll fluorescence, energy dissipation, mosses, photoprotection, photosystem II, reaction centre, zeaxanthin


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. Hajek and R. P. Beckett
Effect of Water Content Components on Desiccation and Recovery in Sphagnum Mosses
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2008; 101(1): 165 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Veerman, S. Vasil'ev, G. D. Paton, J. Ramanauskas, and D. Bruce
Photoprotection in the Lichen Parmelia sulcata: The Origins of Desiccation-Induced Fluorescence Quenching
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2007; 145(3): 997 - 1005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
U. Heber, M. Azarkovich, and V. Shuvalov
Activation of mechanisms of photoprotection by desiccation and by light: poikilohydric photoautotrophs
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2007; 58(11): 2745 - 2759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.