JXB Advance Access originally published online on September 19, 2005
Journal of Experimental Botany 2006 57(2):401-411; doi:10.1093/jxb/eri280
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH PAPER |
Plastic plants and patchy soils
Department of Biology, Area 14, PO Box 373, University of York, York YO10 5YW, UK
* Fax: +44 (0)1904 328564. E-mail: ah29{at}york.ac.uk
Soil nutrients are distributed in a non-uniform or ‘patchy’ manner. It is well established that the modular nature of root systems allows them to show both morphological and/or physiological plasticity upon encountering nutrient-rich patches. These plastic responses are widely believed to be foraging mechanisms by the plant to enhance nutrient resource capture. Although morphological plasticity has traditionally been viewed as the more expensive option as it requires new root construction, more recent evidence suggests this may not necessarily be the case. Moreover, plants may be able to recapture most of the initial outlay involved in new root construction, again lowering the overall cost to the plant. Under natural conditions the roots of most plant species have an additional nutrient acquisition mechanism namely mycorrhizal symbiosis. However, the impact of these important symbiotic associations upon the host plant's response to nutrient patches has received relatively little attention. The mycorrhizal fungal symbiont should, in theory, be better able to compete directly with the rest of the microbial community for the nutrients in the patch. This could potentially be important to the host plant, as generally, root proliferation responses are more important for interspecific plant, than plant–microbial, competition.
Key words: Mycorrhizal symbiosis, nutrient competition, nitrogen, root physiological and morphological plasticity
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. G. Forde Is it good noise? The role of developmental instability in the shaping of a root system J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2009; 60(14): 3989 - 4002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Peret, A. Larrieu, and M. J. Bennett Lateral root emergence: a difficult birth J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2009; 60(13): 3637 - 3643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Zhang and E. George Root proliferation of Norway spruce and Scots pine in response to local magnesium supply in soil Tree Physiol, February 1, 2009; 29(2): 199 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. E. Drenovsky, C. E. Martin, M. R. Falasco, and J. J. James Variation in resource acquisition and utilization traits between native and invasive perennial forbs Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2008; 95(6): 681 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Vincent and D. Harja Exploring Ecological Significance of Tree Crown Plasticity through Three-dimensional Modelling Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1221 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Finlay Ecological aspects of mycorrhizal symbiosis: with special emphasis on the functional diversity of interactions involving the extraradical mycelium J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2008; 59(5): 1115 - 1126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lucas, C. Godin, C. Jay-Allemand, and L. Laplaze Auxin fluxes in the root apex co-regulate gravitropism and lateral root initiation J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2008; 59(1): 55 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Pierret, C. Doussan, Y. Capowiez, F. Bastardie, and L. Pages Root Functional Architecture: A Framework for Modeling the Interplay between Roots and Soil Vadose Zone J., May 17, 2007; 6(2): 269 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. KUME, N. SEKIYA, and K. YANO Heterogeneity in Spatial P-distribution and Foraging Capability by Zea mays: Effects of Patch Size and Barriers to Restrict Root Proliferation within a Patch Ann. Bot., December 1, 2006; 98(6): 1271 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|