Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2006
Journal of Experimental Botany 2006 57(5):1119-1128; doi:10.1093/jxb/erj093
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/5/1119    most recent
erj093v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koiwa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hasegawa, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koiwa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hasegawa, P. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koiwa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hasegawa, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

Identification of plant stress-responsive determinants in arabidopsis by large-scale forward genetic screens

Hisashi Koiwa1,*, Ray A. Bressan2 and Paul M. Hasegawa2

1Department of Horticultural Science and Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, 2133 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2133, USA
2Center for Plant Environmental Stress Physiology, 625 Agriculture Mall Drive, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: koiwa{at}neo.tamu.edu

All plants sense and adapt to adverse environmental conditions, however, crop plants exhibit less genetic diversity for abiotic stress tolerance than do wild relatives indicating that a genetic basis exists for stress adaptability. Model plant genetic systems and the plethora of molecular genetic resources that are currently available are greatly enhancing our ability to identify abiotic stress-responsive genetic determinants. Forward genetic screens of T-DNA mutagenized Arabidopsis thaliana populations in the genetic background of ecotypes C24RD29a-LUC and Col-0 gl1 sos3-1 were carried out to begin an exhaustive search for such determinants. The C24RD29a-LUC screens identified mutants with altered salt/osmotic stress sensitivity or mutants with altered expression of the salt/osmotic/cold/ABA-responsive RD29a gene. Also, mutations that alter the NaCl sensitivity of sos3-1 were screened for potential genetic suppressors or enhancers of salt-stress responses mediated by SOS3. In total, more than 250 000 independent insertion lines were screened and greater than 200 individual mutants that exhibited altered stress/ABA responses were recovered. Although several of these mutants have been reported, most have not yet been studied in detail. Notable examples include novel alleles of SOS1 and mutations to genes encoding the STT3a subunit of the oligosaccharyltransferase, syntaxin, RNA polymerase II CTD phosphatases, transcription factors, ABA biosynthetic enzyme, Na+ transporter HKT1, and SUMO E3 ligase. The stress-specific phenotypes of mutations to genes that are involved in many basic cellular functions provide indication of the wide range of control mechanisms in cellular homeostasis that are involved in stress adaptation.

Key words: CCD imaging, osmotic stress, RNA polymerase II, salinity, T-DNA tagging, transcription


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
C. Papdi, E. Abraham, M. P. Joseph, C. Popescu, C. Koncz, and L. Szabados
Functional Identification of Arabidopsis Stress Regulatory Genes Using the Controlled cDNA Overexpression System
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2008; 147(2): 528 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. V. Sun, K. Jin, Y. Liu, W. Yang, X. Xie, L. Ye, L. Wang, L. Zhu, S. Ding, Y. Su, et al.
PBmice: an integrated database system of piggyBac (PB) insertional mutations and their characterizations in mice
Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D729 - D734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Reyes-Reyes and M. Hampsey
Role for the Ssu72 C-Terminal Domain Phosphatase in RNA Polymerase II Transcription Elongation
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2007; 27(3): 926 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Rosado, A. L. Schapire, R. A. Bressan, A. L. Harfouche, P. M. Hasegawa, V. Valpuesta, and M. A. Botella
The Arabidopsis Tetratricopeptide Repeat-Containing Protein TTL1 Is Required for Osmotic Stress Responses and Abscisic Acid Sensitivity
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2006; 142(3): 1113 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.