Skip Navigation

Journal of Experimental Botany 2008 59(14):3941-3952; doi:10.1093/jxb/ern237
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mantlana, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mantlana, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mantlana, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

Photosynthetic properties of C4 plants growing in an African savanna/wetland mosaic

K. B. Mantlana1,2,*, A. Arneth3,4, E. M. Veenendaal2,5, P. Wohland3,6, P. Wolski5, O. Kolle1, M. Wagner6 and J. Lloyd6

1Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC), Jena, Germany
2Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Netherlands
3Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
4Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystems Analysis, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
5Harry Oppenheimer Okavango Research Centre (HOORC), Maun, Botswana
6Earth and Biosphere Institute, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Global Change & Biodiversity Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X7, Kirstenbosch Research Center, Cape Town, South Africa. E-mail: mantlana{at}sanbi.org

Photosynthesis rates and photosynthesis–leaf nutrient relationships were analysed in nine tropical grass and sedge species growing in three different ecosystems: a rain-fed grassland, a seasonal floodplain, and a permanent swamp, located along a hydrological gradient in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. These investigations were conducted during the rainy season, at a time of the year when differences in growth conditions between the sites were relatively uniform. At the permanent swamp, the largest variations were found for area-based leaf nitrogen contents, from 20 mmol m–2 to 140 mmol m–2, nitrogen use efficiencies (NUE), from 0.2 mmol (C) mol–1 (N) s–1 to 2.0 mmol (C) mol–1 (N) s–1, and specific leaf areas (SLA), from 50 cm2 g–1 to 400 cm2 g–1. For the vegetation growing at the rain-fed grassland, the highest leaf gas exchange rates, high leaf nutrient levels, a low ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration, and high carboxylation efficiency were found. Taken together, these observations indicate a very efficient growth strategy that is required for survival and reproduction during the relatively brief period of water availability. The overall lowest values of light-saturated photosynthesis (Asat) were observed at the seasonal floodplain; around 25 µmol m–2 s–1 and 30 µmol m–2 s–1. To place these observations into the broader context of functional leaf trait analysis, relationships of photosynthesis rates, specific leaf area, and foliar nutrient levels were plotted, in the same way as was done for previously published ‘scaling relationships’ that are based largely on C3 plants, noting the differences in the analyses between this study and the previous study. The within- and across-species variation in both Asat and SLA appeared better predicted by foliar phosphorus content (dry mass or area basis) rather than by foliar nitrogen concentrations, possibly because the availability of phosphorus is even more critical than the availability of nitrogen in the studied relatively oligotrophic ecosystems.

Key words: C4 species, leaf nitrogen, leaf phosphorus, net photosynthesis, nitrogen use efficiency, specific leaf area, stomatal conductance

Received 4 March 2008; Revised 29 July 2008 Accepted 20 August 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.