JXB Advance Access originally published online on February 27, 2008
Journal of Experimental Botany 2008 59(4):779-791; doi:10.1093/jxb/erm363
RESEARCH PAPER |
Plant response to nitrate starvation is determined by N storage capacity matched by nitrate uptake capacity in two Arabidopsis genotypes
1INRA, UMR1091 Environnement et Grandes Cultures, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
2INRA, UR511 Nutrition Azotée des Plantes, F-7800 Versailles, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: richardm{at}grignon.inra.fr
In a low-input agricultural context, plants facing temporal nutrient deficiencies need to be efficient. By comparing the effects of NO
-starvation in two lines of Arabidopsis thaliana (RIL282 and 432 from the Bay-0xShahdara population), this study aimed to screen the physiological mechanisms allowing one genotype to withstand NO-deprivation better than another and to rate the relative importance of processes such as nitrate uptake, storage, and recycling. These two lines, chosen because of their contrasted shoot N contents for identical shoot biomass under N-replete conditions, underwent a 10 d nitrate starvation after 28 d of culture at 5 mM NO. It was demonstrated that line 432 coped better with NO-starvation, producing higher shoot and root biomass and sustaining maximal growth for a longer time. However, both lines exhibited similar features under NO-starvation conditions. In particular, the nitrate pool underwent the same drastic and early depletion, whereas the protein pool was increased to a similar extent. Nitrate remobilization rate was identical too. It was proportional to nitrate content in both shoots and roots, but it was higher in roots. One difference emerged: line 432 had a higher nitrate content at the beginning of the starvation phase. This suggests that to overcome NO-starvation, line 432 did not directly rely on the N pool composition, nor on nitrate remobilization efficiency, but on higher nitrate storage capacities prior to NO-starvation. Moreover, the higher resistance of 432 corresponded to a higher nitrate uptake capacity and a 2–9-fold higher expression of AtNRT1.1, AtNRT2.1, and AtNRT2.4 genes, suggesting that the corresponding nitrate transporters may be preferentially involved under fluctuating N supply conditions.
Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana, genetic variability, N partitioning, N recycling, N use efficiency, nitrate deficiency, nitrate remobilization rate, nitrate transporter gene expression, nitrogen reserves, plant development
Received 12 July 2007; Revised 21 November 2007 Accepted 17 December 2007
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Huanosto Magana, S. Adamowicz, and L. Pages Diel changes in nitrogen and carbon resource status and use for growth in young plants of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Ann. Bot., May 1, 2009; 103(7): 1025 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|