JXB Advance Access originally published online on November 1, 2007
Journal of Experimental Botany 2008 59(7):1475-1487; doi:10.1093/jxb/erm245
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SPECIAL ISSUE REVIEW PAPER |
Stand aside stomata, another actor deserves centre stage: the forgotten role of the internal conductance to CO2 transfer
School of Biological Sciences, Heydon-Laurence Building A08, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
* E-mail: charles.warren{at}bio.usyd.edu.au
Internal conductance describes the movement of CO2 from substomatal cavities to sites of carboxylation. Internal conductance has now been measured in approximately 50 species, and in all of these species it is a large limitation of photosynthesis. It accounts for somewhat less than half of the decrease in CO2 concentrations from the atmosphere to sites of carboxylation. There have been two major findings in the past decade. First, the limitation due to internal conductance (i.e. Ci–Cc) is not fixed but varies among species and functional groups. Second, internal conductance is affected by some environmental variables and can change rapidly, for example, in response to leaf temperature, drought stress or CO2 concentration. Biochemical factors such as carbonic anhydrase or aquaporins are probably responsible for these rapid changes. The determinants of internal conductance remain elusive, but are probably a combination of leaf anatomy, morphology, and biochemical factors. In most plants, the gas phase component of internal conductance is negligible with the majority of resistance resting in the liquid phase from cell walls to sites of carboxylation. The internal conductance story is far from complete and many exciting challenges remain. Internal conductance ought to be included in models of canopy photosynthesis, but before this is feasible additional data on the variation in internal conductance among and within species are urgently required. Future research should also focus on teasing apart the different steps in the diffusion pathway (intercellular spaces, cell wall, plasmalemma, cytosol, and chloroplast envelope) since it is likely that this will provide clues as to what determines internal conductance.
Key words: Economics, internal conductance, mesophyll conductance, nitrogen, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transfer conductance, transpiration, water
Received 22 June 2007; Revised 13 September 2007 Accepted 17 September 2007
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. B. Heinen, Q. Ye, and F. Chaumont Role of aquaporins in leaf physiology J. Exp. Bot., June 19, 2009; (2009) erp171v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. P. Mullin, S. C. Sillett, G. W. Koch, K. P. Tu, and M. E. Antoine Physiological consequences of height-related morphological variation in Sequoia sempervirens foliage Tree Physiol, May 29, 2009; (2009) tpp037v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Centritto, M. Lauteri, M. C. Monteverdi, and R. Serraj Leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and grain yield in contrasting rice genotypes subjected to water deficits during the reproductive stage J. Exp. Bot., May 14, 2009; (2009) erp123v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Vrabl, M. Vaskova, M. Hronkova, J. Flexas, and J. Santrucek Mesophyll conductance to CO2 transport estimated by two independent methods: effect of variable CO2 concentration and abscisic acid J. Exp. Bot., May 11, 2009; (2009) erp115v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Monti, G. Bezzi, and G. Venturi Internal conductance under different light conditions along the plant profile of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Brown.) J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2341 - 2350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Tazoe, S. von Caemmerer, M. R. Badger, and J. R. Evans Light and CO2 do not affect the mesophyll conductance to CO2 diffusion in wheat leaves J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2291 - 2301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Niinemets, I. J. Wright, and J. R. Evans Leaf mesophyll diffusion conductance in 35 Australian sclerophylls covering a broad range of foliage structural and physiological variation J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2433 - 2449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Niinemets, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Flexas, J. Galmes, and C. R. Warren Importance of mesophyll diffusion conductance in estimation of plant photosynthesis in the field J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2271 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Galle, I. Florez-Sarasa, M. Tomas, A. Pou, H. Medrano, M. Ribas-Carbo, and J. Flexas The role of mesophyll conductance during water stress and recovery in tobacco (Nicotiana sylvestris): acclimation or limitation? J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2379 - 2390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Niinemets, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Flexas, J. Galmes, and C. R. Warren Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2249 - 2270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Evans, R. Kaldenhoff, B. Genty, and I. Terashima Resistances along the CO2 diffusion pathway inside leaves J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2235 - 2248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Perez-Martin, J. Flexas, M. Ribas-Carbo, J. Bota, M. Tomas, J. M. Infante, and A. Diaz-Espejo Interactive effects of soil water deficit and air vapour pressure deficit on mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Vitis vinifera and Olea europaea J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2391 - 2405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.R. Woodruff, F.C. Meinzer, B. Lachenbruch, and D.M. Johnson Coordination of leaf structure and gas exchange along a height gradient in a tall conifer Tree Physiol, February 1, 2009; 29(2): 261 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|