Skip Navigation


JXB Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2009
Journal of Experimental Botany 2009 60(8):2433-2449; doi:10.1093/jxb/erp045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/8/2433    most recent
erp045v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niinemets, U.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niinemets, U.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Niinemets, U.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Journal of Experimental Botany issue: Special Issue: Mesophyll conductance to CO2: mechanisms, modelling, and ecological implications [View the issue table of contents]

Mesophyll Conductance in Field Stressful Environments

Leaf mesophyll diffusion conductance in 35 Australian sclerophylls covering a broad range of foliage structural and physiological variation

Ülo Niinemets1,*, Ian J. Wright2 and John R. Evans3

1Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, Tartu 51014, Estonia
2Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
3Environmental Biology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, GPO Box 475, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ylo.niinemets{at}emu.ee

Foliage structure, chemistry, photosynthetic potentials (Vcmax and Jmax), and mesophyll diffusion conductance (gm) were quantified for 35 broad-leaved species from four sites with contrasting rainfall and soil fertility in eastern Australia. The aim of the study was to estimate the extent to which gm and related leaf properties limited photosynthesis (A), focusing on highly sclerophyllous species typical of the ‘slow-return’ end of the leaf economics spectrum. Leaf dry mass per unit area (MA) varied ~5-fold, leaf life span (LL) and N (NM) and P (PM) contents per dry mass ~8-fold, and various characteristics of foliage photosynthetic machinery 6- to 12-fold across the data set. As is characteristic of the ‘leaf economics spectrum’, more robust leaves with greater MA and longevity were associated with lower nutrient contents and lower foliage photosynthetic potentials. gm was positively correlated with Vcmax and Jmax, and these correlations were stronger on a mass basis. Only gm/mass was negatively associated with MA. CO2 drawdown from substomatal cavities to chloroplasts (Ci–CC) characterizing mesophyll CO2 diffusion limitations was larger in leaves with greater MA, lower gm/mass, and lower photosynthetic potentials. Relative limitation of A due to finite mesophyll diffusion conductance, i.e. 1–A(infinite gm)/A(actual gm), was always >0.2 and up to 0.5 in leaves with most robust leaf structure, demonstrating the profound effect of finite gm on realized photosynthesis rates. Data from different sites were overlapping in bivariate relationships, and the variability of average values between the sites was less than among the species within the sites. Nevertheless, photosynthesis was more strongly limited by gm in low rain/high nutrient and high rain/low nutrient sites that supported vegetation with more sclerophyllous foliage. These data collectively highlight a strong relationship between leaf structure and gm, and demonstrate that realized photosynthesis rates are strongly limited by gm in this highly sclerophyllous flora.

Key words: Assimilation rates, diffusion limitations, foliage structure, limited nutrients, nitrogen content, phosphorus content, sclerophylls, structure–function relationships, water availability

Received 28 November 2008; Revised 3 February 2009 Accepted 4 February 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
U. Niinemets, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Flexas, J. Galmes, and C. R. Warren
Importance of mesophyll diffusion conductance in estimation of plant photosynthesis in the field
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2271 - 2282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
U. Niinemets, A. Diaz-Espejo, J. Flexas, J. Galmes, and C. R. Warren
Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(8): 2249 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.