Skip Navigation



JXB Advance Access published online on October 7, 2009

Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erp295
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verhagen, B. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aziz, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verhagen, B. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aziz, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Verhagen, B. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aziz, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

RESEARCH PAPER

Pseudomonas spp.-induced systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea is associated with induction and priming of defence responses in grapevine

Bas W. M. Verhagen1,*, Patricia Trotel-Aziz1, Michel Couderchet1, Monica Höfte2 and Aziz Aziz1,{dagger}

1URVVC – Stress & Environment EA 2069, PPDD, University of Reims, F-51687 Reims cedex 2, France
2Laboratory of Phytopathology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, University of Ghent, B-9000 Gent, Belgium

{dagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: aziz.aziz{at}univ-reims.fr

Non-pathogenic rhizobacteria Pseudomonas spp. can reduce disease in plant tissues through induction of a defence state known as induced systemic resistance (ISR). This resistance is based on multiple bacterial determinants, but nothing is known about the mechanisms underlying rhizobacteria-induced resistance in grapevine. In this study, the ability of Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 to induce resistance in grapevine against Botrytis cinerea is demonstrated. Both strains also triggered an oxidative burst and phytoalexin (i.e. resveratrol and viniferin) accumulation in grape cells and primed leaves for accelerated phytoalexin production upon challenge with B. cinerea. Treatment of cell cultures with crude cell extracts of bacteria strongly enhanced oxidative burst, but resulted in comparable amounts of phytoalexins and resistance to B. cinerea to those induced by living bacteria. This suggests the production of bacterial compounds serving as inducers of disease resistance. Using other strains with different characteristics, it is shown that P. fluorescens WCS417 (Pch-deficient), P. putida WCS358 (Pch- and SA-deficient) and P. fluorescens Q2-87 (a DAPG producer) were all capable of inducing resistance to an extent similar to that induced by CHA0. However, in response to WCS417 (Pch-negative) the amount of H2O2 induced is less than for the CHA0. WCS417 induced low phytoalexin levels in cells and lost the capacity to prime for phytoalexins in the leaves. This suggests that, depending on the strain, SA, pyochelin, and DAPG are potentially effective in inducing or priming defence responses. The 7NSK2 mutants, KMPCH (Pch- and Pvd-negative) and KMPCH-567 (Pch-, Pvd-, and SA-negative) induced only partial resistance to B. cinerea. However, the amount of H2O2 triggered by KMPCH and KMPCH-567 was similar to that induced by 7NSK2. Both mutants also led to a low level of phytoalexins in grapevine cells, while KMPCH slightly primed grapevine leaves for enhanced phytoalexins. This highlights the importance of SA, pyochelin, and/or pyoverdin in priming phytoalexin responses and induced grapevine resistance by 7NSK2 against B. cinerea.

Key words: Induced resistance, oxidative burst, phytoalexins, priming, Pseudomonas spp., rhizobacteria, siderophores, Vitis vinifera


* Present address: MAF Biosecurity New Zealand, PO Box 2526, Wellington 6140, New Zealand.

Received 1 July 2009; Revised 8 September 2009 Accepted 10 September 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.