Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 356, pp. 641-652,
April 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Nuclear magnetic resonance micro-imaging in the investigation of plant cell metabolism
Magnetic Resonance Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Received 24 November 2000; Accepted 22 December 2000
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Micro-imaging based on nuclear magnetic resonance offers the possibility to map metabolites in plant tissues non-invasively. Major metabolites such as sucrose and amino acids can be observed with high spatial resolution. Stable isotope tracers, such as 13C-labelled metabolites can be used to measure the in vivo conversion rates in a metabolic network. This review summarizes the different nuclear magnetic resonance micro-imaging techniques that are available to obtain spatially resolved information on metabolites in plants. A short general introduction into NMR imaging techniques is provided. Particular emphasis is given to the difficulties encountered when NMR micro-imaging is applied to plant systems.
Key words: Metabolite pools in plants, non-invasive imaging, nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rapid development of molecular biological techniques over the last decade now allows plant biologists to investigate metabolism in plants in detail by changing, selectively, the expression of an enzyme in a cell or, by site-directed mutagenesis, its kinetics and allosteric properties. Whilst these experiments have yielded information on the complexity of metabolic regulation, they have also highlighted that metabolism is often compartmentalized within the tissue. Studies using ß-glucuronidase gene fusions, indirect immuno-localization or, more recently, the use of constructs with genes encoding for the green fluorescent protein (Fricker and Oparka, 1999
Recently it has been demonstrated that techniques based on NMR micro-imaging provide a versatile tool for monitoring water movement in plant research (Scheenen et al., 2000
a, b
; Rokitta et al., 1999
; Köckenberger et al., 1997
). However, NMR imaging techniques can also be used to monitor the temporal changes of metabolic pools. They provide spatially resolved and chemically selective information via a non-invasive measurement, thus making possible the observation of temporal changes and fluxes through successive experiments. This review summarizes the fundamental principles of spectroscopic NMR micro-imaging and the difficulties encountered when this technique is applied to plant systems. In addition, potential applications for the investigation of metabolic compartmentation in plants are discussed.
| Fundamental principles of NMR |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A few important principles are summarized here to provide a suitable background for the discussion of NMR micro-imaging experiments on plant systems. A detailed introduction to nuclear magnetic resonance and its micro-imaging variant can be found in various textbooks (de Graaf, 1998
A number of nuclei, such as 1H, 13C, 32P, 17O, 15N, and 19F possess a magnetic moment and angular momentum (nuclear spin). The magnetic dipole axes of the nuclei are usually randomly ordered. However, when exposed to a magnetic field, this field interacts with the magnetic moments of the nuclei. A new thermal equilibrium is achieved in which the population of nuclei with the magnetic dipole axes aligned parallel with the external field is slightly bigger than the population of the nuclei with anti-parallel aligned axes. A weak magnetization of the sample, which can be represented by a vector Mo (Fig. 1a
), results from this unequal population distribution. The sample magnetization can be measured through the induction of a voltage signal in a coil surrounding the sample after its manipulation by an appropriate combination of radio-frequency pulses.
|
One of the most fundamental principles underlying nuclear magnetic resonance is the proportionality between the resonance frequency (the Larmor frequency) and the magnetic field that acts on the nuclei. Both, the identification of the chemical nature of a compound by its resonance lines and the acquisition of spatially resolved images of a sample are based on this principle. Since the main magnetic field is shielded by surrounding electron clouds the magnetic field acting on a nucleus depends on the chemical nature of the group and the chemical environment in which it is bound. For instance, the hydrogen nuclei bound to carbons at different positions in a sucrose molecule can be identified by their different resonance frequencies due to differences in the local shielding of the magnetic field.
In magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic field gradients are superimposed on to the main magnetic field to give the local field a spatial dependence. The resonance frequency thus becomes a measure of the location within the sample. It is instructive to consider a number of magnetization vectors, each corresponding to a different location in the sample (Fig. 2
). Initially, all vectors represent magnetization with identical resonance frequency. During the application of a magnetic field gradient their resonance frequency depends on the position within the sample and therefore they lose their initial phase coherence due to the differences in their resonance frequency. After the magnetic field gradient is switched off, these frequencies again become identical. The spatial position, however, remains encoded in the phase shift, which each magnetization vector has accumulated during the gradient application. In a conventional imaging experiment with phase-space-encoding, the amplitude of the gradient pulse is incremented and the NMR signal is acquired for each repetition (Fig. 2
). Another way to look at the phase shift of each magnetization vector is to think of the magnetization vectors being rotated with position-dependent frequency through the application of the field gradient. Fourier analysis of the signal can yield the different frequencies. The spectrum resulting from this analysis represents a projection of the sample perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field gradient (Fig. 2
). In an imaging experiment the space is encoded by the application of magnetic field gradients in three dimensions, x, y, z.
|
| T2* relaxation and echo formation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another important phenomenon can be understood if the same picture as above is used, in which the sample magnetization is divided in a number of magnetization vectors representing subunits of the sample. Initially, after the application of a
/2 pulse these magnetization vectors are synchronized and in phase (Fig. 3b
pulse (Fig. 3d
|
| T1, T2 relaxation and diffusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In micro-imaging applications it is important to consider diffusion of the molecules and relaxation processes during the time period between excitation by the
/2 pulse and acquisition. After the thermal equilibrium is perturbed by the initial
/2 pulse, the nuclei start to return to the initial state by relaxation (Fig. 1
The phase coherence can only be restored through a
pulse if the local magnetic field does not change in the evolution period. However, there are continuous fluctuations of the local magnetic fields due to rotational and translational molecular motion, which cause an unrecoverable loss of the phase coherence (Fig. 1
). The resulting decay of the average sample magnetization vector in the transverse plane is again a first order process with a time constant T2. The mechanistic explanations of both longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates include a variety of physical processes, such as inter- and intramolecular dipoledipole interactions between two nuclei and the effect of paramagnetic ions. The local variation of relaxation parameters can be used to create contrast in NMR micro-images (Xia, 1996
; Callaghan, 1991
). Typical values for proton T1 and T2 in plants at 11.75 T (500 MHz) are 1.5 s and 15 ms, respectively. T2*, which determines the linewidth in a spectroscopic experiment, is, however, mostly shorter and of the order of 510 ms at such high field strength. In young castor bean plants, this time constant is around 15 ms, therefore making this plant particularly appropriate for spectroscopic NMR micro-imaging studies.
The most important process contributing to the unrecoverable loss of phase coherence in plants is the diffusion of the molecules (e.g. the water molecules) in internal magnetic field gradients in the time period between excitation and signal acquisition (diffusive motion of water: 12 µm2 ms-1). The precession frequency of the magnetic dipole changes continuously while the molecule is moving through areas with different local magnetic fields. The accumulated phase shift during the random motion cannot be completely reversed by the application of the
pulse. Therefore, diffusion in an inhomogeneous magnetic field increases the apparent transverse relaxation rate and gives rise to additional line broadening and attenuation of the NMR signal.
The inhomogeneity of the magnetic field in plants stems mainly from the presence of small air-filled intercellular spaces (Callaghan et al., 1994
; Bowtell et al., 1990
; Connelly et al., 1987
). Air and water have different magnetic susceptibility when exposed to a magnetic field (
=9x10-6). The susceptibility difference can result in strong internal magnetic field gradients at the interface between water and air. Since these internal magnetic field gradients can be much stronger than the externally applied field gradients for spatial encoding, they can also lead to image distortions in addition to the increase in the T2 relaxation rate (Callaghan et al., 1994
; Bowtell et al., 1990
). The internal gradients depend linearly on the strength of the applied field. Therefore, susceptibility artefacts and shortening of the transverse relaxation time constant T2 can become more pronounced with increased magnetic field strength. This dependency can counteract the expected signal increase when working with high field magnets.
| Signal-to-noise ratio |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The signal in an NMR experiment is a small electromotive force that is induced in the detection coil by the precession of the sample magnetization in the transverse plane. The created voltage across both ends of the coils is of the order of several µV. The voltage is amplified and digitized. However, from the coil to digitization there are a number of sources for experimental noise that impair the detection sensitivity (Hoult and Richards, 1976
The duration of the experiment, the achievable spatial resolution within this time and the concentration of a molecule that is still detectable in the experiment depend on each other in a triangular relation. For instance, if the experiment has to be made more sensitive to metabolites with lower concentrations either the spatial resolution can be decreased (that is, larger volume elements are investigated) or the experimental time can be increased. Similarly, if the spatial resolution should be increased, a longer experimental duration is necessary and/or one has to reduce on the detection sensitivity for metabolites. In fact, the experimental time is proportional to the sixth power of the inverse of the resolution. Therefore, if the resolution has to be improved by a factor of two in all three dimensions the experimental duration will increase by a factor of 64.
| Micro-imaging and compartmentation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Figure 4a
10 µm) can hardly be resolved in an NMR micro-imaging experiment. Nevertheless, the unique ability of NMR imaging to create different contrasts by the appropriate choice of experimental parameters can be used to acquire images that show a high degree of anatomical detail.
|
|
If relaxation time constants are different in the various compartments such as vacuoles, cytoplasm and apoplast, the contribution of water in the individual compartments to the total signal can be estimated by appropriate NMR experiments (van Dusschoten et al., 1996
| Imaging of metabolites |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metabolites can be identified in NMR spectra by the characteristic chemical shift of their resonance lines. The chemical shift effect scales with the strength of the static magnetic field. Therefore, a large magnetic field gives a dispersion of the resonance lines over a wide range. The in vivo identification of the chemical nature of the metabolites is frequently made difficult by the broad linewidths of the resonance lines which is caused by the short T2* relaxation in plant tissue. In addition, the resonance line of the water protons in the plant tissue can dominate the in vivo 1H NMR spectrum. Since the gain of an NMR spectrometer is adjusted according to the resonance with the highest intensity, a large difference between the intensity of the water resonance and the metabolite resonance lines makes the detection of the metabolites difficult. Therefore, strategies for water suppression can improve the detection sensitivity for low concentrated metabolites in plant tissue (Xia and Jelinski, 1995
Since the concentrations of major metabolites such as sucrose and various amino acids in plants are in comparison to water a factor of 103105 lower, experiments for the in vivo detection of metabolites require longer experimental times and can not provide information with the same high spatial resolution as conventional NMR micro-imaging using the water protons. Typically, the in-plane resolution is several hundreds of micrometres with observed slices of several millimetres thickness. Thick slices are, however, frequently favoured by the axial homogeneity of the plant tissue such as in shoots. With such parameters and favourable plants such as castor bean seedlings it is possible to detect metabolites with concentrations as low as a few mM.
| Chemical shift imaging |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One possible experiment to map metabolites in plants is selective excitation of only the resonance frequency of the desired metabolite in a chemical shift imaging experiment. This is especially practicable if a characteristic resonance of the metabolite of interest is well separated from all other resonance lines within the sample (Pope, 1992
| Spectroscopic imaging |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In spectroscopic imaging a complete spectrum is recorded for each volume element (Brown et al., 1982
|
| Correlation peak imaging |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Frequently, metabolites cannot be identified in a conventional one-dimensional spectrum because of the signal overlap of their broad resonance lines in in vivo experiments. For instance, the proton resonance lines of several amino acids are scattered closely together around 2.1 ppm and 1.5 ppm. One solution to improve the identification of chemical compounds is the use of two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy. The two-dimensional spectroscopic experiment can be combined with spatial encoding to give an experiment that provides information in four dimensions, two spatial and two spectral dimensions (von Kienlin et al., 2000
| 13C imaging |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The stable isotope 13C can be detected in an NMR experiment, however, the relative detection sensitivity is in comparison to 1H nuclei, a factor of 64 worse. In addition, the natural abundance of 13C is only 1.1%. The low abundance can also be considered as an advantage, since it is possible to utilize position-labelled 13C compounds as tracers in an in vivo investigation of the flux through a metabolic network. A number of experiments in which position-labelled precursors were supplied to excised plant tissue and perfused cells have demonstrated the versatility of this approach in studying primary and secondary plant metabolism (Roberts, 2000
|
| Filtering |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another approach to selecting only the resonance arising from a chemical group of interest is the application of multiple quantum filtering. Here, a particular coherence is selected with an appropriate pulse sequence and all unwanted coherences, including the water proton resonance are effectively suppressed. In medical NMR imaging such filters have been successfully used to detect the resonance of lactate and glucose in muscles or brain, respectively (de Graaf et al., 2000
| Other nuclei |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Apart from 1H and 13C nuclei, micro-imaging experiments on plants have been performed with sodium and deuterium. In the 23Na-NMR experiment, NaCl was supplied to the roots of castor bean seedlings and the uptake and accumulation of the sodium ion was observed (Olt et al., 2000
| Quantification |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Quantification of metabolites in a spectroscopic NMR micro-imaging experiment is possible if reference capillaries with solutions of the metabolites of interest are attached to the plant. The localized spectra of the plant tissue can then be calibrated during post-processing using the resonance lines from the compounds in the reference capillary. However, since the NMR signal is very sensitive to properties of the immediate environment of the metabolite, spatial variation in signal intensity can also reflect the spatial dependence of these properties rather than variations of the metabolite concentration. This is a problem particularly in heterogeneous systems such as plants where relaxation parameters can vary strongly between different types of tissue. Ideally, the effect of these variations must be minimized by the proper choice of the experimental parameters or these variations have to be taken into account in any attempt to estimate the local in vivo metabolite concentration. In the extreme case, a fraction of a metabolite pools could be invisible in an NMR experiment due to rapid relaxation of the detectable magnetization. This indicates the location of the metabolite in different compartments with different relaxation properties. Such NMR invisible pools of metabolites have been described in medical application of spectroscopic imaging (Schneider et al., 2000
The spatial variations of physical and chemical parameters that are accessible through NMR micro-imaging experiments might shed light on interesting aspects of compartmentation in the physiology of plants. For instance viscosity, chemical exchange and diffusion all have an effect on relaxation rates. These parameters can be investigated with the appropriate micro-imaging experiments.
Quantification by comparison of the localized spectra with spectra of a reference solution is also biased by differences in the liquid fraction in the volume elements. In a reference capillary the volume element consists of solution only while a volume element in plant tissue sometimes contains a considerable fraction of solid-like material such as starch or membrane and cell walls. The actual metabolite concentration in the plant tissue is then underestimated due to this partial volume effect.
| NMR micro-imaging as a tool in the investigation of plant cell metabolism |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The various NMR micro-imaging techniques available for the investigation of cell metabolism can be divided into two categories. In the first category the techniques can be used to measure the distribution of metabolites within the intact plants. In this respect they compete with destructive techniques such as tissue printing, some staining techniques of optical micrographs, single cell sap sampling of tissue cross sections or single photon bioluminescence and single-photon imaging. NMR micro-imaging can be used to detect a number of metabolites directly in intact plants. Its non-invasive nature is clearly an advantage when transient changes of metabolic pools are monitored. For instance, there is no other technique available to detect changes in the sucrose concentration within the phloem of intact plants. In addition to the detection of temporal changes, the individual vascular bundles can be resolved within the parenchymatic tissue thus making studies of the responses of individual phloem strands possible (Verscht et al., 1998
NMR micro-imaging experiments in the second category provide dynamic information in a completely different way. These techniques are used to detect NMR tracers such as the stable carbon isotope 13C. In principle, it is possible to investigate the transport of these tracers, their accumulation rates and, provided the metabolite pools are large enough for their detection by NMR, the conversion of one metabolite into another by observing changes in the pattern of their 13C resonance lines. Interesting applications for these techniques are experiments in which accumulation rates or fluxes can be detected in intact plants and compared between wild type and transgenic plants with alterations of primary metabolic pathways.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NMR micro-imaging is probably one of the most versatile non-invasive techniques to measure multiple chemical and physical parameters with high spatial resolution. The application to plants is challenging since plants are, in respect to the NMR experiments, very heterogeneous systems. Some plants such as castor bean plants appear to be more appropriate than other plant species. However, NMR micro-imaging techniques have not yet been applied frequently to plants and a systematic investigation might provide a more detailed picture of the effect of compartmentation on the NMR micro-image. Spatially resolved spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging have the potential to help in the investigation of metabolite compartmentation in plant tissue of major plant metabolites such as hexoses, sucrose and amino acids and therefore could also be a useful tool in the investigation of sugar sensing in plant tissue.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The author would like to thank the Royal Society for continuing support. The author is also grateful to Dr R. Bocotell for carefully reading the manuscript.
| Notes |
|---|
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Walter.Kockenberger {at}nottingham.ac.uk
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Belton PS, Ratcliffe RG. 1985. NMR and compartmentation in biological tissues. Progress in NMR Spectroscopy 17, 241279.
Borisjuk L, Walenta S, Weber H, Mueller-Klieser W, Wobus U. 1998. High-resolution histographical mapping of glucose concentration in developing cotyledons of Vicia faba in relation to mitotic activity and storage processes: glucose as a possible developmental trigger. The Plant Journal 15, 583591.[Web of Science]
Bowtell RW, Brown GD, Glover PM, McJury M, Mansfield P. 1990. Resolution of cellular structures by NMR microscopy at 11.7 T. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A 333, 457467.
Brown TR, Kincaid BM, Ugurbil K. 1982. NMR chemical shift imaging in three dimensions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 79, 35233526.
Bürkle L, Hibberd JM, Quick P, Kühn C, Hirner B, Frommer WB. 1998. The H+-sucrose cotransporter NtSUT1 is essential from sugar export from tobacco leaves. Plant Physiology 118, 5968.
Callaghan PT. 1991. Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. Oxford University Press.
Callaghan PT, Clarke CJ, Forde LC. 1994. Use of static and dynamic NMR microscopy to investigate the origins of contrast in images of biological tissues. Biophysical Chemistry 50, 225235.[Web of Science][Medline]
Connelly A, Lohman JAB, Loughman BC, Quiquampoix H, Ratcliffe RG. 1987. High resolution imaging of plant tissue by NMR. Journal of Experimental Botany 38, 17131723.
de Graaf RA. 1998. In vivo NMR Sectroscopy. Chichester: J Wiley and Sons.
de Graaf RA, Dijkhuizen RM, Biessels GJ, Braun KPJ, Nicolay K. 2000. In vivo glucose detection by homonuclear spectral editing. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 43, 621626.
Farrar J, Pollock C, Gallagher J. 2000. Sucrose and the integration of metabolism in vascular plants. Plant Science 154, 111.
Fox GG, Ratcliffe RG, Robinson SA, Slade AP, Stewart GR. 1992. Detection of 15N-labelled ammonium. In vivo 15N NMR versus mass spectrometry. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 96, 146143.
Fricker MD, Oparka KJ. 1999. Imaging techniques in plant transport: meeting review. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 10891100.[Abstract]
Fu H, Kim SY, Park WD. 1995. High-level tuber expression and sucrose inducibility of a potato sus4 sucrose synthase gene require 5' and 3' flanking sequences and the leader intron. The Plant Cell 7, 13871394.[Abstract]
Heidenreich M, Köckenberger W, Kimmich R, Chandrakumar N, Bowtell R. 1998. Investigation of carbohydrate metabolism and transport in castor bean seedlings by cyclic J cross polarization imaging and spectroscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 132, 109124.
Heidenreich M, Köckenberger W, Kimmich R, Chandrakumar N, Bowtell R. 2001. Proton detected 13C magnetic resonance microscopy: in vivo transport of sucrose in Ricinus communis. Manuscript in preparation.
Hoult DI, Richards RE. 1976. The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 24, 7185.[Web of Science]
Jang JC, Sheen JS. 1997. Sugar sensing in higher plants. Trends in Plant Science 2, 208214.[Web of Science]
Katz JJ, Crespi HL. 1970. Isotope effects in biological systems. In: Collins CJ, Bowman NS, eds. Isotope effects in chemical reactions. ACS Monograph 167, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Keltner JR, Wald LL, Ledden PJ, Chen Y-CI, Matthews RT, Küstermann EHGK, Baker JR, Rosen BR, Jenkins BG. 1998. A localized double-quantum filter for the in vivo detection of brain glucose. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 39, 651656.
Kimmich R. 1997. NMR tomography, diffusometry, relaxometry. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Koch KE. 1996. Carbohydrate modulated gene expression in plants. Annual Reviews in Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 509540.[Web of Science]
Koch KE, Ying Z, Wu Y, Avigne WT. 2000. Multiple paths of sugar-sensing and a sugar/oxygen overlap for genes of sucrose and ethanol metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, Special Issue, 417427.
Köckenberger W, Pope J, Xia Y, Jeffrey K, Komor E, Callaghan PT. 1997. A non-invasive measurement of phloem and xylem water flow in castor bean seedlings by nuclear magnetic resonance micro-imaging. Planta 201, 5363.[Web of Science]
Koreleva OA, Farrar JF, Tomos AD, Pollock CJ. 1997. Patterns of solute in individual mesophyll, bundle sheat and epidermal cells of barley leaves induced to accumulate carbohydrate. New Pythologist 136, 97104.
Kunze C, Kimmich R. 1994. Proton-detected 13C imaging using cyclic J crosspolarization. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 12, 805810.[Web of Science][Medline]
Lei H, Peeling J. 1999. Simultaneous lactate editing and observation of other metabolites using a stimulated echo enhanced double-quantum filter. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 137, 215220.
Link J, Seelig J. 1990. Comparison of deuterium NMR imaging methods and application to plants. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 89, 310330.
Meininger M, Jakob PM, von Kienlin M, Koppler D, Bringmann G, Haase A. 1997. Radial spectroscopic imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 125, 325331.
Metzler A, Izquierdo M, Ziegler A, Köckenberger W, Komor E, von Kienlin M, Haase A, Decorps M. 1995. Plant histochemistry by correlation peak imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92, 1191211915.
Metzler A, Köckenberger W, von Kienlin M, Komor E, Haase A. 1994. Quantitative measurement of sucrose distribution in Ricinus communis seedlings by chemical shift microscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance B 105, 249252.
Olt S, Krotz E, Komor E, Rokitta M, Haase A. 2000. N23 and H1 NMR micro-imaging of intact plants. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 144, 297304.
Oparka KJ, Roberts AG, Boevink P, Santa Cruz S, Roberts L, Pradel KS, Imlau A, Kotlizky G, Sauer N, Epel B. 1999. Simple, not branched, plasmodesmata allow the non-specific trafficking of proteins in developing tobacco leaves. Cell 97, 743754.[Web of Science][Medline]
Pope JM. 1992. Application of chemical shift microscopy to non-invasive histochemistry of plant materials. In: Blümich B, Kuhn W, eds. Magnetic resonance microscopy. Weinheim: VCH, 441457.
Pope JM, Jonas D, Walker RR. 1993. Applications of NMR micro-imaging to the study of water, lipid and carbohydrate distribution in grape berries. Protoplasma 173, 177186.
Pope JM, Rumpel H, Kuhn W, Walker R, Leach D, Sarafis V. 1991. Application of chemical-shift-selective NMR microscopy to the non-invasive histochemistry of plant materials. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 9, 357363.[Web of Science][Medline]
Pope JM, Walker RR, Kron T. 1992. Artifacts in chemical shift selective imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 10, 695698.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ratcliffe RG, Roscher A. 1998. Prospects for in vivo NMR methods in xenobiotic research in plants. Biodegradation 9, 411422.
Ratcliffe RG. 1994. In vivo NMR studies of higher plants and algae. Advances in Botanical Research 20, 44123.
Roberts JKM. 2000. NMR adventures in the metabolic labyrinth within plants. Trends in Plant Science 5, 3034.[Web of Science][Medline]
Roitsch T. 2000. Source-sink regulations by sugar and stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2, 198206.
Rokitta M, Peuke AD, Zimmermann U, Haase A. 1999. Dynamic studies of phloem and xylem flow in fully differentiated plants using fast NMR micro-imaging. Protoplasma 209, 126131.[Medline]
Rumpel H, Pope JM. 1992. The application of 3D chemical shift microscopy to non-invasive histochemistry. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 10, 187194.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sacchi GA, Cocucci M. 1992. Effects of deuterium oxide on growth, proton extrusion, potassium influx and in vitro plasma membrane activities in maize root segments. Plant Physiology 100, 19611967.
Scheenen TWJ, van Dusschoten D, de Jager PA, van As H. 2000a. Quantification of water transport in plants with NMR imaging. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 17511759.
Scheenen TWJ, van Dusschoten D, de Jager PA, van As H. 2000b. Microscopic displacement imaging with pulsed field gradient turbo spin-echo NMR. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 142, 207215.
Schneider J, Fekete E, Weisser A, Neubauer S, von Kienlin M. 2000. Reduced 1H-NMR visibility of creatine in isolated rat hearts. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 43, 497502.
Schulze W, Frommer WB, Ward JM. 1999. Transporters of ammonium, amino acids and peptides are expressed in pitchers of carnivorous plants Nephentes. The Plant Journal 17, 637646.[Web of Science][Medline]
Slichter C. 1990. Principle of magnetic resonance. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Snaar JEM, van As H. 1992a. A method for simultaneous measurement of NMR spin-lattice and spin-spin relaxation times in compartmentalized systems. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 99, 139148.
Snaar JEM, van As H. 1992b. Probing water compartments and membrane permeability in plant cells by 1H NMR relaxation measurement. Biophysical Journal 63, 16541658.
Stadler R, Truernit E, Gahrtz M, Sauer N. 1999. The AtSUC1 sucrose carrier may represent the osmotic driving force for anther dehiscence and pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 19, 269278.[Web of Science][Medline]
Tse TY, Spanswick RM, Jelinski LW. 1996. Quantitative evaluation of NMR and MRI methods to measure sucrose concentration on plants. Protoplasma 194, 5462.
van der Weerd L, Ruttink T, Claessens M, Vergeldt F, van As H. 1998. Osmotic stress effects on growth and cell water balance in maize and pearl millet. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, Special Issue, 12.
van Dijk, JE, Mehlkopf AF, Bovee WMMJ. 1992. Comparison of double and zero quantum NMR editing techniques for in vivo use. NMR in Biomedicine 5, 7586.[Web of Science][Medline]
Verscht J, Kalusche B, Köhler J, Köckenberger W, Metzler A, Haase A, Komor E. 1998. The kinetics of sucrose concentration in the phloem of individual vascular bundles of the Ricinus communis seedling measured by nuclear magnetic resonance micro-imaging. Planta 205, 132139.
van Dusschoten D, Moonen CTW, de Jager PA, van As H. 1996. Unravelling diffusion constants in biological tissue by combining Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill Imaging and Pulsed Field Gradient NMR. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 36, 907913.
von Kienlin M, Ziegler A, Le Fur Y, Rubin C, Decorps M, Remy C. 2000. 2D-spatial/2D-spectral spectroscopic imaging of intracerebral gliomas in rat brain. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 43, 211219.
Wolf K, van der Toorn A, Hartmann K, Schreiber L, Schwab W, Haase A, Bringmann G. 2000. Metabolic monitoring in plants with double-quantum filtered chemical shift imaging. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 21092117.
Xia Y, Jelinski LW. 1995. Imaging low-concentrated metabolites in the presence of a large background signal. Journal of Magnetic Resonance B 107, 19.
Xia Y. 1996. Contrast in NMR imaging and microscopy. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance 8, 205225.
Ziegler A, Metzler A, Köckenberger W, Izquirdo M, Komor E, Haase A, Decorps M, von Kienlin M. 1996. Correlation peak imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance B 112, 141150.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Melkus, H. Rolletschek, R. Radchuk, J. Fuchs, T. Rutten, U. Wobus, T. Altmann, P. Jakob, and L. Borisjuk The Metabolic Role of the Legume Endosperm: A Noninvasive Imaging Study Plant Physiology, November 1, 2009; 151(3): 1139 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Morley-Smith, M. J. Pike, K. Findlay, W. Kockenberger, L. M. Hill, A. M. Smith, and S. Rawsthorne The Transport of Sugars to Developing Embryos Is Not via the Bulk Endosperm in Oilseed Rape Seeds Plant Physiology, August 1, 2008; 147(4): 2121 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Lunn Compartmentation in plant metabolism J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(1): 35 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Borisjuk, H. Rolletschek, U. Wobus, and H. Weber Differentiation of legume cotyledons as related to metabolic gradients and assimilate transport into seeds J. Exp. Bot., January 3, 2003; 54(382): 503 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

. After the application of a
, precessing in the transverse plane with a frequency 

rotates the magnetization vectors by 180° (d). This results in a reversal of the loss of phase coherence (e) and an echo is created after a time 2


=1.3 ppm) and a methyl group (

