Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 360, pp. 1555-1561, July 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

Possible explanation of the disparity between the in vitro and in vivo measurements of Rubisco activity: a study in loblolly pine grown in elevated pCO2

Alistair Rogers1, David S. Ellsworth and Steven W. Humphries

Environmental Sciences Department, Building 490D, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000, USA

Received 19 February 2001; Accepted 21 March 2001


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Rubisco activity can be measured using gas exchange (in vivo) or using in vitro methods. Commonly in vitro methods yield activities that are less than those obtained in vivo. Rubisco activity was measured both in vivo and in vitro using a spectrophotometric technique in mature Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) trees grown using free-air CO2 enrichment in elevated (56 Pa) and current (36 Pa) pCO2. In addition, for studies where both in vivo and in vitro values of Rubisco activity were reported net CO2 uptake rate (A) was modelled based on the in vivo and in vitro values of Rubisco activity reported in the literature. Both the modelling exercise and the experimental data showed that the in vitro values of Rubisco activity were insufficient to account for the observed values of A. A trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation of the protein from samples taken in parallel with those used for activity analysis was co-electrophoresed with the extract used for determining in vitro Rubisco activity. There was significantly more Rubisco present in the TCA precipitated samples, suggesting that the underestimation of Rubisco activity in vitro was attributable to an insufficient extraction of Rubisco protein prior to activity analysis. Correction of in vitro values to account for the under-represented Rubisco yielded mechanistically valid values for Rubisco activity. However, despite the low absolute values for Rubisco activity determined in vitro, the trends reported with CO2 treatment concurred with, and were of equal magnitude to, those observed in Rubisco activity measured in vivo.

Key words: Rubisco activity, elevated CO2.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is well documented that with long-term exposure to elevated pCO2 the initial stimulation of net CO2 uptake (A) is often not maintained (Gunderson and Wullschleger, 1994Go; Curtis, 1996Go; Drake et al., 1997Go). Such a reduction in photosynthetic capacity in elevated pCO2, termed acclimation (Drake et al., 1997Go), has been largely attributed to a loss of active Rubisco (Rogers and Humphries, 2000Go). If photosynthetic acclimation is to be incorporated into models seeking to determine the influence of the terrestrial biosphere on the global carbon cycle then an accurate and quantitative assessment of acclimation is required. Key to this assessment is the measurement of Rubisco activity in a manner that allows quantitative comparison among different experiments and the use of absolute values in modelling exercises.

The activity of Rubisco can be determined in vivo using gas exchange (von Caemmerer and Farquhar, 1981Go; Wullschleger, 1993Go; Long et al., 1996Go) or with in vitro methods (Lilley and Walker, 1974Go; Ward and Keys, 1989Go; Reid et al., 1997Go). Both in vitro and in vivo approaches seek to measure the same parameter, yet in the few studies where in vivo and in vitro values for Rubisco activity are presented they rarely concur, commonly the in vitro values are lower than those obtained in vivo (Myers et al., 1999Go; Tissue et al., 1999Go; Griffin et al., 2000Go).

The authors hypothesized that the NADH-linked spectrophotometric in vitro method underestimates the in situ activity of Rubisco and that this underestimation is due largely to an insufficient extraction of Rubisco protein prior to the in vitro assay. To address this hypothesis two approaches were used. (1) A model (WIMOVAC; Humphries and Long, 1995Go) was used to predict C3 photosynthesis in order to determine if the in vitro values of Rubisco activity reported in the literature are mechanistically capable of supporting the observed A. (2) Rubisco activity in the needles of Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) grown in current and elevated pCO2 was determined using an in vitro method (Tissue et al., 1993Go) and in vivo by gas exchange and subsequent analyses of the initial slope of the A–ci response (Wullschleger, 1993Go). Four questions linked to this hypothesis have been addressed.

  1. Based on the mechanism of C3 photosynthesis described earlier (Farquhar et al., 1980Go), do in vitro methods underestimate Rubisco activity?
  2. Is underestimation of Rubisco activity attributable to an incomplete extraction of Rubisco protein prior to in vitro analyses?
  3. Can in vitro measurements be corrected to give mechanistically valid, quantitative values useful in modelling photosynthesis and its limitations?
  4. Are in vitro estimates of Rubisco activity qualitatively consistent with in vivo values?


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plant material and growth conditions
The study was conducted at the free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) site in the Blackwood Division of Duke Forest in Orange County, NC, USA. The site and the FACE facility are described elsewhere (Ellsworth, 1999Go). The mid-sections of current year needles from 16-year-old loblolly pines grown for c. 2.5 years in elevated (current+20 Pa) and current (36 Pa) pCO2 were sampled on 12 May 1999 for the analysis described below (maximum temperature c. 30 °C, maximum I 1800 µmol m-2 s-1). Needle surface area was determined geometrically as described previously (Johnson, 1984Go).

Gas exchange measurements
In situ measurements of the responses of A to pCO2 (Aci curves), were measured with a portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor model 6400, Lincoln, NE, USA). Sunlit pine needles at the top of the crown were sealed inside the chamber while ensuring that chamber conditions maintained growth pCO2, light saturation and a constant temperature (28 °C). After a short period of equilibration to chamber conditions, the measurements of A, ci, and stomatal conductance to water vapour were recorded along with environmental parameters. Chamber pCO2 was then changed and stepped through seven different concentrations starting close to the CO2 compensation point and ending in elevated pCO2. Measurements at each successive pCO2 were made after complete flushing of the chamber with the desired pCO2 judged by stabilization of the CO2 signal. Frequent leak tests were made to minimize bias in the low pCO2 measurements and Teflon tape was used to seal the chamber for measurements. Measurements were made on needles from one tree in each separate experimental plot for the three replicate plots in current and elevated pCO2, concurrently with the in vitro measurements.

In vitro Rubisco activity
Five replicate samples were taken from each treatment replicate. These samples included the needles used in the in situ gas exchange measurements. The tip and base sections of each fascicle were discarded, the mid-section was immediately ground for 10 s in extraction buffer (Tissue et al., 1993Go) at 4 °C using a high speed homogenizer (Polytron; Kinematica, Switzerland). Homogenized samples were frozen immediately and stored in liquid nitrogen until analysed. The process of removing needles to freezing in liquid nitrogen took less than 2 min. Samples were thawed and centrifuged at 13 000 g for 30 s in a microcentrifuge tube. An aliquot of the supernatant was used immediately for determining the initial and total (fully activated) activity of Rubisco using the spectrophotometric, NADH, enzyme-coupled assay described earlier (Tissue et al., 1993Go). Activation state of Rubisco was calculated as the ratio of initial activity to total activity.

Rubisco content
The supernatant resulting from the Rubisco activity analysis was also used for SDS-PAGE. An aliquot was combined with a solution of 62 mM tri(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane, 2% (w/v) SDS, 65 mM dithiothreitol, and 10% (v/v) glycerol. The trichloroacetic acid (TCA)/acetone method described previously (Damerval et al., 1986Go) with some adaptations (Rogers et al., 1998Go) was used to precipitate total needle protein from needles sampled in parallel with those used for the Rubisco activity analyses and from the pellets resulting from the Rubisco activity analysis. Proteins were resolved on 12–18% SDS-polyacrylamide gels as described earlier (Nie et al., 1995Go). Gels were loaded on an equal needle surface area basis. The large subunit of Rubisco was detected by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250. The identity of the Lsu Rubisco was confirmed by co-electrophoresed molecular weight markers (BioRad, Hercules CA, USA). Quantification of individual bands was performed using a two-dimensional laser scanning densitometer (model 300A Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale CA, USA) as described previously (Nie et al., 1995Go).

Protein content
The protein of the supernatant and pellet resulting from the centrifugation of the Rubisco extraction buffer was precipitated for 16 h at 4 °C with 10% TCA. Precipated protein was washed twice with acetone and dissolved in 0.1 M sodium hydroxide. Protein content was determined using a commercial kit (BCA Protein Assay, Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).

Modelling
The data used for modelling were taken from studies where both the in vivo gas exchange method, and the in vitro spectrophotometric method (Lilley and Walker, 1974Go) were used to determine Rubisco activity. Only studies which provided enough information to determine values for A, I, Tleaf, pCO2, Vc,max, and Jmax were selected. The WIMOVAC modelling system (Humphries and Long, 1995Go) was used to simulate the effects of elevated pCO2 on A. The equations used to model leaf photosynthesis (based on those described by Farquhar et al., 1980Go), are listed in Long and Drake (Long and Drake, 1992Go) with the exception of the term for electron transport rate that can be found in Evans and Farquhar (Evans and Farquhar, 1991Go). Dark respiration was assumed to be 1 µmol m-2 s-1 (McMurtrie and Wang, 1993Go). and ci to be 0.7 of growth pCO2 (Long and Drake, 1992Go; Drake et al., 1997Go). For each data set values were entered for I, Tleaf, pCO2, Vc,max, and Jmax and then WIMOVAC was used to predict A in current pCO2 (Rogers and Humphries, 2000Go). The procedure was repeated using the Rubisco activity determined in vitro at both initial and total activity. While the resultant modelled A is somewhat sensitive to the kinetic constants assumed, the goal of this study was not to model A precisely, but instead to test the degree of closure between calculations based on gas exchange measurements and enzymatic measurements while using the widely-accepted parameterization of the Farquhar biochemical model of photosynthesis.

Statistical analysis
Differences in A (Tables 2Go, 4Go) and Rubisco activity (Fig. 1Go) were examined by analysis of variance using P=0.05 as the level of significance. An a posteriori Tukey test was used to test for significant differences between individual means. All other statistical analyses were performed using Student's t-test.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Mean Assimilation (±se, n=16) either reported directly in the literature or modelled from reported values of Rubisco activity using the WIMOVAC system to simulate C3 photosynthesis

Data used for this comparison were taken from the studies cited in Table 1Go that determined Rubisco activity using the NADH linked spectrophotometric assay. Means with a common letter are not significantly different (P<0.05).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Mean (±se, n=3) observed and modelled A for the plants described in Fig. 2

A was modelled using the WIMOVAC system to simulate C3 photosynthesis. Means with a common letter are not significantly different (P<0.05).

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mean Rubisco activity (±se, n=3 replicate rings) measured in mature loblolly pines growing in elevated pCO2 (56 Pa, solid bars) and current pCO2 (36 Pa, open bars). Estimates of Rubisco activity were made by analysing the response of A to ci following gas exchange measurements (in vivo) and spectrophotometrically following homogenization and freezing of needles (in vitro). All means were significantly different from one another (P<0.05).

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. The ratio (R) of Rubisco activity measured in vitro to that measured in vivo; and the ratio of the net CO2 uptake rate modelled using WIMOVAC with the in vivo value of Rubisco activity (Amodelled) to the observed CO2 uptake rate (Aobserved); Sp=number of species, n=number of data used in comparison

 



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Sections of Coomassie Blue stained, SDS-PAGE gels showing the levels of the large sub unit (Lsu) of Rubisco measured in mature loblolly pines growing in elevated (56 Pa) and current (36 Pa) pCO2, extracted using two different methods. (A) The comparison between the amount of Lsu Rubisco present in the TCA extract and the amount present in the supernatant used to determine the in vitro Rubisco activity at both elevated and current pCO2. (B) The comparison between the levels of Lsu Rubisco in elevated and current pCO2 in protein extracted using a TCA/acetone method (TCA) and in protein taken from the supernatant used to estimate the in vitro Rubisco activity (supernatant). Valid comparisons are only possible within a gel. Numbers 1, 2 and 3 indicate the three replicate rings in elevated pCO2. The letters A, B and C indicate the three replicate rings in current pCO2.

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Literature survey
The mean Rubisco activity reported for in vitro values from 10 species was c. 50% of that reported from in vivo measurements (t(2),44, P<0.05; Table 1Go ). The model successfully predicted A when supplied with the Rubisco activity determined in vivo (Table 1Go). For a few studies which reported all the necessary information it was possible to model the A attainable with in vivo, in vitro and fully activated in vitro Rubisco activity (Table 2Go). Again, for this smaller data set from eight species, WIMOVAC successfully predicted the observed A. The modelled A obtained when both initial and fully activated in vitro Rubisco activity values were used was significantly lower (P<0.05) than the observed A (Table 2Go).

Experimental results
The in vivo values observed for Rubisco activity were significantly higher than the in vitro values (F1,8=153, P<0.001; Fig. 1Go). Figures 2AGo and 3AGo show the significantly reduced content of the Lsu Rubisco in the supernatant used for in vitro Rubisco activity analysis compared to the amount of the Lsu Rubisco recovered using the more thorough TCA method (elevated pCO2, P<0.05; current pCO2, P<0.05). Analysis of the pellet and supernatant in samples taken in parallel with those used for the in vitro analysis demonstrated that the supernatant contained c. 25% of the protein and c. 35% of the Rubisco present in the extract prior to centrifugation (Table 3Go ). Rubisco and protein content in the pellet were significantly higher than that in the supernatant (t(2),5, P<0.1, and P<0.001, respectively, n=6). There was no effect of pCO2 on the distribution of Rubisco between the supernatant and the pellet. Growth in elevated pCO2 resulted in a significant decrease in Rubisco activity (F1,8=13.8, P<0.01). This c. 25–30% decrease in Rubisco activity was observed in both the in vivo (Vc,max) and the in vitro measurements (P<0.05, Fig. 1Go). There was no significant effect of elevated pCO2 on the activation state of Rubisco (elevated 46±7%; current 52±9%; t(2),2, P>0.05), but the relative levels of the Lsu Rubisco in elevated pCO2 were c. 25–30% lower than those in current pCO2 (Figs 2Go, 3Go). This significant reduction in Rubisco content in elevated pCO2 was observed in the extract used to determine the in vitro Rubisco activity (t(1),2, P<0.05, Figs 2BGo, 3BGo) and in a TCA/acetone total protein extraction (t(2),2, P<0.05, Figs 2BGo, 3BGo).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Bars show the mean levels of the Lsu Rubisco (±se, n=3 replicate rings) quantified from the SDS-PAGE gels in Fig. 2Go. Comparisons are only possible within a pair of bars (*t(2),2, P<0.05). (A) The levels of Lsu Rubisco in the TCA/acetone protein isolation (TCA) compared with the levels in the supernantant used for Rubisco activity analysis (supernantant) in elevated and current pCO2. (B) The levels of the Lsu Rubisco in elevated (56 Pa) and current (36 Pa) pCO2 determined in using a TCA/acetone extraction method and determined from the supernatant used for the in vitro Rubisco activity analysis.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Rubisco and protein content of the supernatant and pellet resulting from centrifugation of the Rubisco extraction buffer

Analysis was performed on needles taken in parallel with those used for activity analysis. The coomassie blue stained Lsu Rubisco band from SDS-PAGE is shown for one representative replicate. The results of quantifying all six replicates using laser densitometry are shown below.

 

Correction of in vitro Rubisco activity
The difference between the Lsu content of the TCA/ acetone extract and the supernatant (Figs 2Go, 3Go) was used to correct in vitro values of Rubisco activity for Rubisco not present in the supernatant using a multiplier (i.e. 2.63). Although slightly smaller, the corrected in vitro values for Rubisco activity were not significantly different from the in vivo values (P>0.05; data not shown). Table 4Go shows the observed A and the result of using WIMOVAC to predict A using either the in vitro, in vivo or corrected in vitro value for Rubisco activity. Regardless of pCO2 treatment, the A predicted using the in vitro value for Rubisco activity was significantly smaller than the observed A (P<0.001). The values of A modelled using the in vivo and corrected in vitro Rubisco activities were not significantly different from each other or the observed A (P >0.05; Table 4Go).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Does the in vitro assay underestimate Rubisco activity?
Following a literature search, the in vitro measurements of Rubisco activity were used in WIMOVAC to predict A. The predicted A was c. 65% lower than the observed A, clearly demonstrating that the observed A was mechanistically impossible if the in vitro estimate of Rubisco activity was correct. It has been suggested that the low values of Rubisco activity reported using the NADH spectrophotometric assay are due to a loss of activation associated with the extraction of Rubisco (Sage et al., 1993Go; Theobald et al., 1998Go). However, when the fully activated in vitro values for Rubisco activity were used in the model instead of the initial values, the predicted A was still c. 50% lower than the observed A (Table 2Go). Even when maximal activity (the activity of the fully activated enzyme in the absence of inhibitors; Parry et al., 1997Go) was measured in spring wheat, a value was reported that was still c. 20% lower than that required to support the A observed in the same plants (Theobald et al., 1998Go).

The experimental data support the conclusions drawn from the literature search. Figure 1Go shows that the value for Rubisco activity obtained using the in vitro method is lower than that obtained using the in vivo method and when used for modelling A the in vitro values were found to be too low to account for the observed A (Table 4Go). Despite the low activation state (c. 50%) the observed value for the fully activated Rubisco was still not sufficient to account for the observed A (data not shown). Clearly the in vitro assay underestimates Rubisco activity.

Is underestimation of Rubisco activity attributable to an incomplete extraction of Rubisco protein prior to in vitro analyses?
The protein in needles sampled in parallel with the Rubisco activity assay was precipitated using a TCA/ acetone method. This method is a thorough total protein extraction method (Damerval et al., 1986Go; Rogers et al., 1998Go), which, it was assumed, would precipitate all the protein in the needle samples. Figures 2AGo and 3AGo clearly show that the amount of Lsu Rubisco present in the supernatant used for the spectrophotometric assay of Rubisco activity is lower than the amount in needles sampled in parallel using the TCA/acetone method. As a confirmation the distribution of total protein and Rubisco between the pellet and supernatant was analysed. A large proportion of Rubisco was present in the pellet supporting the hypothesis that Rubisco is under-represented in the supernatant (Table 3Go). The difference in the distribution between the supernatant and pellet of total protein and Rubisco is probably due to insoluble proteins that are not represented in the assay buffer. This also suggests that it is unlikely that the low Rubisco activity values obtained with the in vitro method are due specifically to insoluble forms of Rubisco which are not present in the supernantant (Crafts-Brandner et al., 1991Go; Crafts-Brandner and Salvucci, 1994Go). Using a similar protocol for Rubisco activity analysis in soybean, it has been demonstrated that the relative quantity of Rubisco in the supernatant and pellet fractions were similar to the distribution of Rubisco activity (Crafts-Brandner et al., 1991Go). This work further supports this study's hypothesis that the ‘missing’ activity is associated with Rubisco present in the pellet. It is concluded that the rapid, one-step homogenization procedures used for Rubisco isolation, in an attempt to preserve enzyme activation state, fail to isolate a large proportion of the Rubisco present in the needles and lead to an underestimation of Rubisco activity when expressed on a leaf area basis.

Can in vitro measurements be corrected to give mechanistically valid, quantitative values?
Since TCA extracts co-electrophoresed with the supernatant used for the activity analysis allowed the determination of relative Rubisco content in both extracts (Fig. 2AGo), the activity value could be corrected for the Rubisco not represented in the supernatant. Table 4Go shows that the uncorrected values of in vitro Rubisco activity are not sufficient to account for the observed A. However, if these values are corrected as described above the modelled A is comparable to, and not significantly different from, the observed A. This suggests that, at least for loblolly pines, TCA/acetone extractions made in parallel with activity measurements can be used to correct for the poor representation of Rubisco in the buffer used for activity analysis and provide mechanistically valid, quantitative estimates of Rubisco activity.

Are in vitro estimates of Rubisco activity qualitatively consistent with in vivo values?
Growth in elevated pCO2 resulted in a significant c. 25% reduction in the in vitro measured Rubisco activity (Fig. 1Go) with no change in the activation state of the enzyme due to pCO2 treatment. This decrease observed with the in vitro assay was also measured in vivo. This suggests that although the absolute values obtained using the in vitro method may not be mechanistically consistent with the observed A the relative treatment effects reported are still valid. This qualitative agreement between the values of Rubisco activity reported in studies using in vitro and in vivo methods is well documented (Li et al., 1999Go; Myers et al., 1999Go; Tissue et al., 1999Go; Griffin et al., 2000Go). Furthermore, Figs 2BGo and 3BGo clearly show that the decrease of the Lsu Rubisco in elevated pCO2 is visible in both protein extracts and is of the same magnitude.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank David Tissue for instruction in Rubisco activity analysis, Divine Adika and Elke Naumburg for technical assistance and George Hendrey, Keith Lewin, John Nagy and Andrew Palmiotti for dedication in constructing and operating the FACE system. This research was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-98CH10886.


    Notes
 
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +1 631 344 2060. E-mail: arogers{at}bnl.gov Back


    Abbreviations
 
A, net CO2 uptake (µmol m-2 s-1);; ci, CO2 concentration in the sub-stomatal cavity (µmol mol-1);; FACE, free-air CO2 enrichment;; I, photosynthetic quantum flux density (µmol m-2 s-1);; Jmax, maximum in vivo rate of electron transport (µmol m-2 s-1);; Lsu, large subunit of Rubisco;; pCO2, partial pressure of CO2;; Tleaf, leaf temperature (°C);; TCA, trichloroacetic acid;; Vc,max, maximum in vivo rate of ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate-saturated carboxylation (µmol m-2 s-1);; WIMOVAC, Windows Intuitive Model of Vegetation response to Atmosphere and Climate change.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvucci ME, Egli DB. 1991. Fruit removal in soybean induces the formation of an insoluble form of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in leaf extracts. Planta 183, 300–306.

Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvucci ME. 1994. The Rubisco complex protein: A protein induced by fruit removal that forms a complex with ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Planta 194, 110–116.

Curtis PS. 1996. A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated CO2 in situ. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 127–137.

Damerval C, Devienne D, Zivy M, Thiellement H. 1986. Technical improvements in two-dimensional electrophoresis increase the level of genetic-variation detected in wheat-seedling proteins. Electrophoresis 7, 52–54.

Drake BG, Gonzalez-Meler MA, Long SP. 1997. More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48, 609–639.[Web of Science]

Ellsworth DS. 1999. CO2 enrichment in a maturing pine forest: are CO2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 461–472.

Evans JR, Farquhar GD. 1991. Modeling canopy photosynthesis from the biochemistry of the C3 chloroplast. In: Boote KJ, Loomis RS, eds. Modeling crop photosynthesis—from biochemistry to canopy. Madison: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, 1–15.

Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. 1980. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90.[Web of Science]

Griffin KL, Tissue DT, Turnbull MH, Whitehead D. 2000. The onset of photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 partial pressure in field-grown Pinus radiata D. Don. after 4 years. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 1089–1098.

Gunderson CA, Wullschleger SD. 1994. Photosynthetic acclimation in trees to rising atmospheric CO2: a broader perspective. Photosynthesis Research 39, 369–388.

Habash DZ, Paul MJ, Parry MAJ, Keys AJ, Lawlor DW. 1995. Increased capacity for photosynthesis in wheat grown in elevated CO2: the relationship between electron transport and carbon metabolism. Planta 197, 482–489.

Humphries SW, Long SP. 1995. WIMOVAC: a software package for modeling the dynamics of plant leaf and canopy photosynthesis. Cabios 11, 361–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Johnson JD. 1984. A rapid technique for estimating total surface area of pine needles. Forest Science 30, 913–921.

Li J, Dijkstra P, Wheeler R, Drake B. 1999. Photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration in the Florida scrub-oak species Quercus geminata and Quercus myrtifolia growing in their native environment. Tree Physiology 19, 229–234.[Web of Science][Medline]

Lilley RM, Walker DA. 1974. An improved spectrophotometric assay for ribulose-phosphate carboxylase. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 358, 226–229.[Medline]

Long SP, Drake BG. 1992. Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations: crop photosynthesis spatial and temporal determinants. In: Baker NR, Thomas H, eds. Crop photosynthesis spatial and temporal determinants. Elsevier Science Publishers, 69–103.

Long SP, Farage PK, Garcia RL. 1996. Measurement of leaf and canopy photosynthetic CO2 exchange in the field. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 1629–1642.

Martindale W, Leegood RC. 1997. Acclimation of photosynthesis to low temperature in Spinacia oleracea L. II. Effects of nitrogen supply. Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 1873–1880.

McKee IF, Farage PK, Long SP. 1995. The interactive effects of elevated CO2 and O3 concentration on photosynthesis in spring wheat. Photosynthesis Research 45, 111–119.

McMurtrie RE, Wang YP. 1993. Mathematical models of the photosynthetic response of tree stands to rising CO2 concentrations and temperatures. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 1–13.

Myers D, Thomas R, Delucia E. 1999. Photosynthetic capacity of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) trees during the first year of carbon dioxide enrichment in a forest ecosystem. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 473–481.

Nie GY, Long SP, Garcia RL, Kimball BA, Lamarte RL, Pinter Jr PJ, Wall GW, Webber AN. 1995. Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment on the development of the photosynthetic apparatus in wheat, as indicated by changes in leaf proteins. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 855–864.

Parry MAJ, Andralojc PJ, Parmar S, Keys AJ, Habash D, Paul MJ, Alred R, Quick WP, Servaites JC. 1997. Regulation of Rubisco by inhibitors in the light. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 528–534.

Paul MJ, Driscoll SP. 1997. Sugar repression of photosynthesis: the role of carbohydrates in signaling nitrogen deficiency through source:sink imbalance. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 110–116.

Reid CD, Tissue DT, Fiscus EL, Strain BR. 1997. Comparison of spectrophotometric and radioisotopic methods for the assay of Rubisco in ozone-treated plants. Physiological Plantarum 101, 398–404.

Rogers A, Fischer BU, Bryant J, Frehner M, Blum H, Raines CA, Long SP. 1998. Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 under low-nitrogen nutrition is affected by the capacity for assimilate utilization. Perennial ryegrass under free-air CO2 enrichment. Plant Physiology 118, 683–689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rogers A, Humphries SW. 2000. A mechanistic evaluation of photosynthetic acclimation at elevated CO2. Global Change Biology 6, 1005–1012.

Sage RF, Reid CD, Moore BD, Seemann JR. 1993. Long-term kinetics of the light-dependent regulation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity in plants with and without 2-carboxyarabinitol 1-phosphate. Planta 191, 222–230.[Web of Science]

Socias FX, Medrano H, Sharkey TD. 1993. Feedback limitation of photosynthesis of Phaseolus vulgaris L. grown in elevated CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 81–86.

Theobald JC, Mitchell RAC, Parry MAJ, Lawlor DW. 1998. Estimating the excess investment in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in leaves of spring wheat grown under elevated CO2. Plant Physiology 118, 945–955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tissue DT, Griffin KL, Ball JT. 1999. Photosynthetic adjustment in field-grown ponderosa pine trees after six years of exposure to elevated CO2. Tree Physiology 19, 221–228.[Web of Science][Medline]

Tissue DT, Thomas RB, Strain BR. 1993. Long-term effects of elevated CO2 and nutrients on photosynthesis and rubisco in loblolly pine seedlings. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 859–865.

Turnbull M, Tissue D, Griffin K, Rodgers G, Whitehead D. 1998. Photosynthetic acclimation to long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration in Pinus radiata D. Don. is related to age of needles. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 1019–1028.

van Oosten J-J, Besford RT. 1995. Some relationships between the gas exchange, biochemstry and molecular biology of photosynthesis during leaf development of tomato plants after transfer to different carbon dioxide concentrations. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 1253–1266.

von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153, 376–387.[Web of Science]

von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD. 1984. Effects of partial defoiliation, changes of irradiance during growth, short-term water stress and growth at enhanced p(CO2) on the photosynthetic capacity of leaves of Phaseolus vulgarisis L. Planta 160, 320–329.

Ward DA, Keys AJ. 1989. A comparison between the coupled spectrophotometric and uncoupled radiometric assays for RubP carboxylase. Photosynthesis Research 22, 167–171.

Wullschleger SD. 1993. Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants—a retrospective analysis of the A/Ci curves from 109 species. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 907–920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. Wang, S. L. Naidu, A. R. Portis Jr, S. P. Moose, and S. P. Long
Can the cold tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthusxgiganteus relative to Zea mays be explained by differences in activities and thermal properties of Rubisco?
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1779 - 1787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. Galmes, H. Medrano, and J. Flexas
Acclimation of Rubisco specificity factor to drought in tobacco: discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo estimations
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2006; 57(14): 3659 - 3667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. D.B. Leakey, M. Uribelarrea, E. A. Ainsworth, S. L. Naidu, A. Rogers, D. R. Ort, and S. P. Long
Photosynthesis, Productivity, and Yield of Maize Are Not Affected by Open-Air Elevation of CO2 Concentration in the Absence of Drought
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2006; 140(2): 779 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?