Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leubner-Metzger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Meins, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leubner-Metzger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Meins, F., Jr
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leubner-Metzger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Meins, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 362, pp. 1753-1759, September 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

Antisense-transformation reveals novel roles for class I ß-1,3-glucanase in tobacco seed after-ripening and photodormancy

Gerhard Leubner-Metzger1,2,3 and Frederick Meins, Jr1

1 Friedrich Miescher-Institute, Maulbeerstrasse 66, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland
2 Institut für Biologie II, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Schänzlestr. 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany

Received 27 September 2000; Accepted 17 May 2001


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Little is known about the molecular basis for seed dormancy, after-ripening, and radicle emergence through the covering layers during germination. In tobacco, endosperm rupture occurs after testa rupture and is the limiting step in seed germination. Class I ß-1,3-glucanase (ßGLU I), which is induced in the micropylar endosperm just prior to its penetration by the radicle, is believed to help weaken the endosperm wall. Evidence is pesented here for a second site of ßGLU I action during after-ripening. Tobacco plants were transformed with antisense ßGLU I constructs with promoters thought to direct endosperm-specific expression. Unexpectedly, these transformants were unaffected in endosperm rupture and did not exhibit reduced ßGLU I expression during germination. Nevertheless, antisense ßGLU I transformation delayed the onset of testa rupture in light-imbibed, after-ripened seeds and inhibited the after-ripening-mediated release of photodormancy. It is proposed that ßGLU I expression in the dry seed contributes to the after-ripening-mediated release of seed dormancy.

Key words: Abscisic acid, after-ripening, coat-enhanced seed dormancy, endosperm-limited seed germination, ß-1,3-glucanase, sense- and antisense transformation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Seed development is completed by a period of maturation when water content decreases, abscisic acid (ABA) accumulates, and primary dormancy is established. ABA is involved in the induction and also in the maintenance of the dormant state, a block of an intact viable seed to complete germination under favourable conditions (Li and Foley, 1997Go; Bewley, 1997Goa; Grappin et al., 2000Go). After-ripening of freshly harvested, mature seeds under warm, dry conditions for several months alters the primary dormancy of many species, including tobacco (Kasperbauer, 1968Go; Koornneef and Karssen, 1994Go; Hilhorst, 1995Go; Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go). Germination starts with imbibition of water by the dry seed and visible protrusion of the radicle through the ruptured covering layers is generally considered as completion of germination. Little is known about the molecular basis for after-ripening and the rupture and penetration of covering layers during the germination of dicotyledonous seeds. In many species the covering layers impose a physical constraint to radicle protrusion, a phenomenon known as ‘coat-enhanced’ dormancy (Hilhorst, 1995Go; Bewley, 1997Goa). In cases where endosperm rupture is the germination-limiting process, weakening of the micropylar endosperm surrounding the radicle tip seems to be required for radicle protrusion and is likely to be achieved by cell-wall hydrolysis by the action of hydrolytic enzymes (Ni and Bradford, 1993Go; Black, 1996Go; Bewley, 1997Gob).

Considerable evidence suggests a causal role for class I ß-1,3-glucanases (ßGLU I) in the emergence of the radicle during tobacco seed germination (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 1999Go, 2000Go). Rupture of the testa precedes rupture of the micropylar endosperm, which is the limiting step of tobacco seed germination (Arcila and Mohapatra, 1983Go). ßGLU I is transcriptionally induced in the micropylar endosperm after testa rupture, but just prior to the onset of endosperm rupture (Leubner-Metzger et al., 1995Go). ßGLU I induction and endosperm rupture are tightly linked in response to plant hormones and environmental factors known to affect the incidence and timing of germination (Leubner-Metzger et al., 1996Go, 1998Go). For example, ABA delays endosperm rupture of seeds imbibed in the light and inhibits ßGLU I accumulation in a concentration-dependent manner (Leubner-Metzger et al., 1995Go). Finally, sense transformation of tobacco with a chimeric ABA-inducible ßGLU I transgene caused overexpression of ßGLU I in seeds and promoted endosperm rupture of mature seeds and of ABA-treated after-ripened seeds (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go). Taken together, these results showed that ßGLU I substantially contributes to endosperm rupture.

In the present study antisense transformation was used and indirect evidence was provided for a second, novel site of ßGLU I action on the release of dormancy during after-ripening of seed.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plasmid construction and plant transformation
The chimeric antisense-ßGlu I constructs KAG4, GAG2 and GAG3 (Fig. 1Go) are transcriptional fusions of three different promoters to the 1.3 kb cDNA containing the entire 1111 bp coding and 184 bp non-coding sequence of ßGLU I in reverse orientation (Shinshi et al., 1988Go; Beffa et al., 1993Go). EcoRI-BamHI DNA fragments containing the promoters were ligated to a 4.1 kb BamHI-EcoRI-EcoRI fragment containing the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S terminator and the vector of the ßGLU I-antisense plasmid described previously (Beffa et al., 1993Go). The 2.7 kb EcoRI-BamHI Cat1 promoter (Suzuki et al., 1994Go, 1995Go) yielded construct KAG4, and the 1.7 kb full-length EcoRI-EcoRI-BamHI and 0.5 kb proximal EcoRI-BamHI promoters of the Glb genomic clone (Hart et al., 1993Go) yielded the constructs GAG2 and GAG3, respectively. The binary vector pCIB200 (Neuhaus et al., 1992Go) was linearized in the polylinker with KpnI and EcoRI and ligated to KpnI-EcoRI fragments of the chimeric antisense-ßGLU I genes. The resulting plasmids pKAG4, pGAG2 and pGAG3 carry the modified T-DNAs (Fig. 1Go) with the chimeric antisense-ßGLU I genes transcribed in the same direction as the chimeric Nos-NptII gene. The methods for introducing the pCIB200 expression vectors into Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Ti-plasmid transformation of Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Havana 425 leaf discs, regeneration of plants, and segregation tests using the kanamycin-resistance marker have been described (Beffa et al., 1993Go). TCIB1 transformants obtained with the empty-vector plasmid pCIB200 were used as controls. Segregation tests were performed with S1 seeds obtained by self-fertilization of independent primary transformants. Homozygous, monogenic S2 seeds were obtained by self-fertilization of S1 plants using kanamycin-resistance as the marker.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of antisense class I ß-1,3-glucanase (ßGLU I) expression vectors used for tobacco transformation. Transcriptional fusions of the castor bean Cat1 promoter (PCat1), the tobacco ßGLU I B gene (Glb) full length promoter (1.7 kb PGlb), and the truncated proximal Glb promoter (0.5 kb PGlb) with a 1.3 kb ßGLU I cDNA in reverse orientation and the CaMV 35S terminator (T35S) constitute the antisense ßGLU I constructs of pKAG4, pGAG2 and pGAG3, respectively. The empty-vector pCIB200 was used to generate control transformants. The chimeric neomycin phosphotransferase gene (NPTII) confers kanamycin resistance and is under the control of the nopaline synthase promoter (PNOS) and terminator (TNOS). The right (RB) and left (LB) T-DNA borders are indicated.

 

Analysis of germination, proteins and RNA
Seed from mature capsules of wild-type or transformed Havana 425 tobacco were used either at c. 40 DAP (‘fresh’ seed) or after at least 6 months of dry storage at c. 22 °C and c. 30% moisture content in the dark (after-ripened seed), as indicated. Germination analyses were performed as described earlier (Leubner-Metzger et al., 1998Go). In brief, 100–150 seeds were sown in plastic Petri dishes containing filter paper wetted with a nutrient solution supplemented as indicated with 50 µg ml-1 kanamycin and 100 µg ml-1 Claforan. Petri dishes were incubated at 25 °C in continuous white light (3000 lx, Philips ‘TL'D 35W/33 lamps) or in darkness. After scoring for germination, seeds were stored at -80 °C for subsequent analysis. Procedures for extracting proteins, assays for enzyme activity, immunoblot analysis, protein determination, preparation of total RNA, and RNA-blot hybridization have been described previously (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Testa rupture is delayed in antisense ßGLU I transformant seeds
Tobacco plants were transformed with antisense constructs containing 1.3 kb of a tobacco ßGLU I cDNA in reverse orientation regulated by the Cat1 gene promoter (KAG4), a full-length 1.7 kb ßGLU I gene promoter (GAG2), and a 0.5 kb minimal ßGLU I gene promoter (GAG3) (Fig. 1Go). Reporter-gene experiments showed that the full-length and minimal ßGLU I promoters confer high- and low-level endosperm-specific expression in germinating tobacco seeds, respectively (Leubner-Metzger et al., 1998Go). The Cat1 promoter is known to confer endosperm-specific transgene expression in germinating tobacco seeds (Suzuki et al., 1995Go; Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go). In the initial screen, after-ripened seed from self-fertilized primary transformants were scored for percentage endosperm rupture at 65 h after the start of imbibition in control medium. Under these conditions all of the 27 TCIB1 control lines had germination percentages greater than 20%. In contrast, 28% of 66 TGAG2 lines, 7% of 58 TGAG3 lines, and 23% of 56 TKAG4 lines had germination percentages less than 20% at the 65 h time point.

Four independent lines of each antisense transformant that showed delayed germination were used in time-course studies. The results in Table 1Go show that both testa and endosperm rupture was delayed by from 3–12.5 h in S1 seed populations from different antisense lines. Detailed time-course studies were made with after-ripened seed of homozygous, monogenic lines derived from the transformants TGAG2-24 and TKAG4-31, which showed substantial delays (12.5 h and 8 h) in the S1 generation screen (Table 1Go). Figure 2AGo and BGo shows that testa and endosperm rupture was delayed by c. 9 h in TGAG2-24 and c. 11 h in TKAG4-31 relative to TCIB1-2. Thus, delay in endosperm rupture of after-ripened antisense ßGLU I seeds is strictly correlated with the delay in testa rupture. Although the possibility can not be excluded that ßGLU I antisense transformation affects both events independently, the authors favour the hypothesis that the delay in endosperm rupture is the consequence of the delay in testa rupture.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Delay of testa rupture and endosperm rupture of after-ripened S1 seeds of independent antisense ßGLU I transformants

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The effect of antisense ßGLU I transformation on the time-course of ßGLU I induction during germination of after-ripened homozygous seed. (A) The incidence of testa rupture expressed as a percentage scored with time after the start of imbibition in continuous light in control medium. Homozygous, monogenic S2 seed populations of independent ßGLU I-antisense lines TGAG2-24 (ßGLU I promoter) and TKAG4-31 (Cat1 promoter) and of empty-vector line TCIB1-2 were used. (B) The incidence of endosperm rupture. (C) The accumulation of ßGLU enzyme activities expressed in pkat µg-1 protein. (D) The accumulation of the 1.6 kb ßGLU I mRNA expressed as arbitrary PhosphoImager units per seed. The signals detected and quantified by RNA-blot hybridization using additional seed samples from the experiment described in (A) are corrected for RNA loading based on the 18S ribosomal RNA signals. (A–C) Mean values ±SE of two samples each with 100–150 seeds are presented (30 h one sample); SE-values <=2.0% and <=0.01 pkat µg-1 protein are not drawn.

 
Figure 2CGo shows that the onset of ßGLU activity accumulation in the homozygous, monogenic antisense ßGLU I seeds (lines TGAG2-24 and TKAG4-31) was delayed relative to TCIB1-2. This delay was comparable to the delay in testa rupture. Moreover, the ßGLU activity detected in seed sampled at the time of 50% germination was comparable in control and antisense lines. It could be argued that antisense-mediated reduction in ßGLU I is compensated for by the production of antigenically distinct ‘ersatz’ enzymes as reported for virus-infected leaves (Beffa et al., 1993Go). This was ruled out by antibody inhibition experiments and immunoblot analyses, which indicated that all the ßGLU activity in the antisense-seeds could be accounted for by ßGLU I (data not shown). A single 1.6 kb ßGLU I transcript of the size expected for tobacco ßGLU I mRNA (Mohnen et al., 1985Go) was detected by RNA-blot hybridization using a ßGLU I cDNA probe. No signals were detected for the slightly smaller antisense transcript described in leaves of antisense ßGLU I transformants (Neuhaus et al., 1992Go). Quantification of the hybridization signals revealed that the accumulation of ßGLU I mRNA was comparable in seeds of the TCIB1-2 and TGAG2-24 transformants and somewhat less in the TKAG4-31 transformants (Fig. 2DGo). Measurements performed with leaf tissue samples from mature homozygous, monogenic antisense and empty-vector control plants similarily revealed no reduction of ßGLU activity, ßGLU I antigen and mRNA contents (data not shown). Thus, there was no consistent inhibition of ßGLU I expression associated with leaves and germinating seeds during endosperm rupture in homozygous antisense lines. Nevertheless, independent antisense transformants made with these promoters showed a substantially delayed germination of after-ripened seed and was correlated with promoter strength. The fact that this delay could be accounted for by the delay in testa rupture, which is prior to ßGLU I induction, led to the investigation of antisense effects on the release of dormancy during after-ripening.

Effects of ßGLU I antisense transformation on after-ripening and photodormancy
The germination percentages were measured in the light at a fixed time after the start of imbibition of fresh mature seeds harvested 40 d after pollination (DAP) and of after-ripened seeds stored at room temperature for at least 6 months after harvest. The final incidence of germination in the light of all the lines was >95%, implying that the germination percentages scored at a fixed time reflect the rate of germination. Table 2Go shows that fresh sense seeds (TKSG7) germinated at approximately 1.5-fold higher percentages (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go), whereas fresh antisense seeds germinated at the same percentages as control seeds. In contrast, after-ripened antisense seeds germinated at c. 9-fold lower percentages compared to control and sense seeds, which germinated at comparable percentages. Thus, in light-imbibed seeds overexpression of ßGLU I replaced the promoting effect of after-ripening on germination; whereas after-ripening appears to be required for the inhibitory effects of antisense ßGLU I transformation on seed germination.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of after-ripening on endosperm rupture and photodormancy of sense and antisense ßGLU I seeds

 
After-ripening contributes to the release of photodormancy and this effect varies greatly for different seed batches as reported for several tobacco cultivars (Kasperbauer, 1968Go; Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go). Freshly harvested Havana 425 tobacco seeds do not germinate in the dark, and neither testa nor endosperm rupture occur even after prolonged periods of time (Leubner-Metzger et al., 1996Go). Sense ßGLU I transformation did not have detectable effects on either photodormancy of fresh seed or on the after-ripening-mediated release of photodormancy (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go). Table 2Go shows that antisense ßGLU I transformation effectively blocked the release of photodormancy during after-ripening. While these germination percentages represent the final incidence of germination during dark-incubation, complete germination can be achieved by subsequent transfer of the dark-incubated seeds to the light.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Sense and antisense transformation of tobacco revealed at least two sites of ßGLU I action on seed germination and dormancy. The tobacco embryo is surrounded by three to five layers of thick-walled endosperm cells and an outer testa of maternal origin consisting of cutinized and lignified dead cells and a living inner parenchyma layer (Avery, 1933Go; Matzke et al., 1993Go). In members of the Solanaceae (e.g. tomato, tobacco, pepper, and Datura ssp.) the endosperm is a mechanical restraint to radicle protrusion, and germination seems to depend on both endosperm weakening by hydrolytic enzymes and sufficient growth of the embryo to overcome this constraint (Ni and Bradford, 1993Go; Bewley, 1997Gob). Ultrastructural studies suggest that the endospermic hole formed at the micropylar end of germinating tobacco seeds results from endosperm ‘dissolution’ rather than from the ‘pushing’ action of radicle growth (Arcila and Mohapatra, 1983Go). Earlier (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go) sense transformation was used with a chimeric ßGLU I gene regulated by the ABA-inducible Cat1 promoter which caused overexpression of ßGLU I in imbibed tobacco seeds and promoted endosperm rupture of mature seeds and of ABA-treated after-ripened seeds. While these results provided direct evidence that ßGLU I has a role in endosperm rupture, they also showed that sense transformation does not affect the timing of testa rupture during imbibition in the light and the release of photodormancy during after-ripening.

The failure to find antisense-mediated reduction of ßGLU I expression during endosperm rupture and in leaves is puzzling. The ßGLU I cDNA in reverse orientation that was used, when regulated by the CaMV 35S RNA promoter, effectively reduced ßGLU I expression in tobacco leaves (Beffa et al., 1993Go). Insufficient promoter strength of the ßGLU I and Cat1 promoter compared to the CaMV 35S RNA promoter could be a reason for the failure to find antisense-mediated reduction of ßGLU I in leaves (Vögeli-Lange et al., 1994Gob; Suzuki et al., 1995Go). However, in germinating seeds, the promoters used directed expression of reporter genes in the endosperm (Suzuki et al., 1995Go; Leubner-Metzger et al., 1998Go) and the Cat1 promoter caused an overexpression of ßGLU I (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go). Since ßGLU I expression is not inhibited in the antisense seeds during endosperm rupture, no conclusion can be drawn from the antisense approach about the effect of ßGLU I on endosperm rupture. The important point is that numerous independent antisense transformants made with these promoters affected the release of photodormancy during after-ripening and showed a substantial incidence of delayed testa rupture of after-ripened seed during imbibition in the light, which was correlated with promoter strength. These results suggest a novel role of ßGLU I action during after-ripening and photodormancy release.

The primary effect of antisense ßGLU I transformation in after-ripened seeds was prior to the onset of testa rupture. A most intriguing observation was that antisense transformation did not affect germination of fresh tobacco seeds sampled c. 40 DAP, which is after maturation and the establishment of primary dormancy is complete (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki et al., 1990Go; Jakobsen et al., 1994Go; Jiang et al., 1996Go). ßGLU I expression is not detectable during the early development or maturation of seeds (data not shown), or during early stages of imbibition (Leubner-Metzger et al., 1995Go). Antisense ßGLU I transformation has no effect on germination in the light and on photodormancy of fresh seeds and, therefore, interferes with secondary seed dormancy rather than primary dormancy. Thus, it is plausible to assume that antisense transformation affects ßGLU I expression sometime during after-ripening. This conclusion and the finding that overexpression of ßGLU I in sense transformants replaced the effect of after-ripening on germination (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go), leads to the proposal that after-ripening is mediated, at least in part, by expression of ßGLU I during prolonged dry storage of seed. ßGLU I could act by direct cell wall degradation resulting in weakening or death of entire cell layers or indirectly by releasing elicitor-active ß-1,3-glucan oligosaccharides that serve as signalling molecules in analogy to the situation during plant–pathogen interaction (Boller, 1995Go). This could directly modify the growth potential of the embryo or alter the characteristics of the testa tissue, which are known to affect seed dormancy in Arabidopsis thaliana (Debeaujon and Koornneef, 2000Go; Debeaujon et al., 2000Go). Knowledge about transcriptional and translational processes leading to gene expression during after-ripening is extremely limited. Although the metabolic activity of seeds in the dry state is very low, Comai and Harada have demonstrated that transcripts of some genes are elongated in nuclei isolated from dry seeds (Comai and Harada, 1990Go), suggesting that these genes are at least transcriptionally competent in the desiccated state. In situ mRNA hybridization of the Arabidopsis GEA1 gene revealed a tissue-specific expression pattern in dry seeds (Gaubier et al., 1993Go). The hypothesis that ßGLU I is expressed and susceptible to antisense inhibition in dry seeds is supported by preliminary results showing that ßGLU I protein and activity is sometimes detected in wild-type but not in antisense seeds sampled at different times during after-ripening (data not shown).

Little is known about the molecular basis for dormancy or the modulation of dormancy during after-ripening (Li and Foley, 1997Go; Bewley, 1997Goa). In many species, including tobacco, endogenous production of ABA is needed for establishing dormancy and for maintaining dormancy as well (Koornneef and Karssen, 1994Go; Rock and Quatrano, 1995Go; Li and Foley, 1997Go; Bewley, 1997Goa; Grappin et al., 2000Go). The endogenous ABA content of dry after-ripened seeds of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia is considerable lower compared to dry mature dormant seeds (Grappin et al., 2000Go). During after-ripening, decreasing ABA levels and possibly decreasing sensitivity to ABA eventually permits ßGLU I expression needed for endosperm rupture during seed imbibition (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go), but could also permit ßGLU I expression in the dry state, which results in the release of dormancy. Decline in ABA content, decreased sensitivity to ABA and increased sensitivity to gibberellins (GA) is correlated with after-ripening of many species (Hilhorst, 1995Go; Li and Foley, 1997Go; Bewley, 1997Goa). While ßGLU I expression in seeds is inhibited by ABA, it is promoted by light, GA, and ethylene (Leubner-Metzger et al., 1998Go; Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 1999Go). It was found that after-ripening contributes to the release of photodormancy of Havana 425 tobacco seeds as has been reported for other tobacco cultivars (Kasperbauer, 1968Go). Whereas sense transformation did not have detectable effects on photodormancy (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 2000Go), antisense transformation greatly inhibited the release of photodormancy due to after-ripening. This raises the possibility that a contribution of ßGLU I is necessary for the after-ripening-mediated release of photodormancy. However, ßGLU I alone is not sufficient and other factors are needed for the complete transition to non-photodormancy. In general, modulation of dormancy during after-ripening results in a broadening of the germination responses to environmental conditions (Li and Foley, 1997Go; Bewley, 1997Goa). The fact that ßGLU I expression is regulated by hormones and environmental factors (reviewed in Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 1999Go) suggests that ßGLU I could be a key factor in modulating dormancy and germination in response to the environment.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Masaharu Suzuki and Waltraud Schmidt-Puchta for kindly providing plasmids; Rosa Waldvogel and Monique Thomas for expert technical assistance; Sjoerd van Eeden and Markus Briker for care of plants; and Thomas Boller, Ramamurthy Baskar and Alejandro Iglesias for their critical comments.


    Notes
 
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at Freiburg. Fax: +49 761 203-2612. E-mail: leubner{at}uni\|[hyphen]\|freiburg.de Back


    Abbreviations
 
ABA, abscisic acid; ßGLU I, class I ß-1,3-glucanase; DAP, days after pollination; GA, gibberellins..


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Arcila J, Mohapatra SC. 1983. Development of tobacco seedling. 2. Morphogenesis during radicle protrusion. Tobacco Science 27, 35–40.

Avery GSJ. 1933. Structure and germination of tobacco seed and the developmental anatomy of the seedling plant. American Journal of Botany 20, 309–327.

Beffa RS, Neuhaus J-M, Meins Jr F. 1993. Physiological compensation in antisense transformants: specific induction of an ‘ersatz’ glucan endo-1,3-ß-glucosidase in plants infected with necrotizing viruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 90, 8792–8796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bewley JD. 1997a. Seed germination and dormancy. The Plant Cell 9, 1055–1066.[Web of Science][Medline]

Bewley JD. 1997b. Breaking down the walls—a role for endo-ß-mannanase in release from seed dormancy? Trends in Plant Science 2, 464–469.[Web of Science]

Black M. 1996. Liberating the radicle: a case for softening-up. Seed Science Research 6, 39–42.

Boller T. 1995. Chemoperception of microbial signals in plant cells. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 46, 189–214.[Web of Science]

Comai L, Harada JJ. 1990. Transcriptional activities in dry seed nuclei indicate the timing of the transition from embryogeny to germination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 87, 2671–2674.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Debeaujon I, Koornneef M. 2000. Gibberellin requirement for Arabidopsis seed germination is determined both by testa characteristics and embryonic abscisic acid. Plant Physiology 122, 415–424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Debeaujon I, Léon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M. 2000. Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination and longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 122, 403–413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gaubier P, Raynal M, Hull G, Huestis GM, Grellet F, Arenas C, Pages M, Delseny M. 1993. Two different Em-like genes are expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds during maturation. Molecular and General Genetics 238, 409–418.

Grappin P, Bouinot D, Sotta B, Miginiac E, Jullien M. 2000. Control of seed dormancy in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia: post-imbibition abscisic acid synthesis imposes dormancy maintenance. Planta 210, 279–285.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hart CM, Nagy F, Meins Jr F. 1993. A 61 bp enhancer element of the tobacco ß-1,3-glucanase B gene interacts with one or more regulated nuclear proteins. Plant Molecular Biology 21, 121–131.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hilhorst HWM. 1995. A critical update on seed dormancy. I. Primary dormancy. Seed Science Research 5, 61–73.

Jakobsen KS, Hughes DW, Galau GA. 1994. Simultaneous induction of post-abscission and germination mRNAs in cultured dicotyledonous embryos. Planta 192, 384–394.[Web of Science][Medline]

Jiang L, Abrams SR, Kermode AR. 1996. Vicilin and napin storage-protein gene promoters are responsive to abscisic acid in developing tobacco seed but lose sensitivity following premature desiccation. Plant Physiology 110, 1135–1144.[Abstract]

Kasperbauer MJ. 1968. Dark-germination of reciprocal hybrid seed from light-requiring and -indifferent Nicotiana tabacum. Physiologia Plantarum 21, 1308–1311.

Koornneef M, Karssen CM. 1994. Seed dormancy and germination. In: Meyerowitz EM, Somerville CR, ed. Arabidopsis. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 313–334.

Leubner-Metzger G, Fründt C, Meins Jr F. 1996. Effects of gibberellins, darkness and osmotica on endosperm rupture and class I ß-1,3-glucanase induction in tobacco seed germination. Planta 199, 282–288.

Leubner-Metzger G, Fründt C, Vögeli-Lange R, Meins Jr F. 1995. Class I ß-1,3-glucanase in the endosperm of tobacco during germination. Plant Physiology 109, 751–759.[Abstract]

Leubner-Metzger G, Meins Jr F. 1999. Functions and regulation of plant ß-1,3-glucanases (PR-2). In: Datta SK, Muthukrishnan S, eds. Pathogenesis-related proteins in plants. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press LLC, 49–76.

Leubner-Metzger G, Meins Jr F. 2000. Sense transformation reveals a novel role for class I ß-1,3-glucanase in tobacco seed germination. The Plant Journal 23, 215–221.[Web of Science][Medline]

Leubner-Metzger G, Petruzzelli L, Waldvogel R, Vögeli-Lange R, Meins Jr F. 1998. Ethylene-responsive element binding protein (EREBP) expression and the transcriptional regulation of class I ß-1,3-glucanase during tobacco seed germination. Plant Molecular Biology 38, 785–795.[Web of Science][Medline]

Li BL, Foley ME. 1997. Genetic and molecular control of seed dormancy. Trends in Plant Science 2, 384–389.

Matzke AJM, Stoger EM, Matzke MA. 1993. A zein gene promoter fragment drives GUS expression in a cell layer that is interposed between the endosperm and the seed coat. Plant Molecular Biology 22, 553–554.[Web of Science][Medline]

Mohnen D, Shinshi H, Felix G, Meins Jr F. 1985. Hormonal regulation of ß-1,3-glucanase messenger RNA levels in cultured tobacco tissues. European Molecular and Biological Organ Journal 4, 1631–1636.

Neuhaus JM, Flores S, Keefe D, Ahl GP, Meins Jr F. 1992. The function of vacuolar ß-1,3-glucanase investigated by antisense transformation. Susceptibility of transgenic Nicotiana sylvestris plants to Cercospora nicotianae infection. Plant Molecular Biology 19, 803–813.[Web of Science][Medline]

Ni BR, Bradford KJ. 1993. Germination and dormancy of abscisic acid-deficient and gibberellin-deficient mutant tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seeds—sensitivity of germination to abscisic acid, gibberellin and water potential. Plant Physiology 101, 607–617.[Abstract]

Rock CD, Quatrano RS. 1995. The role of hormones during seed development. In: Davies PJ, ed. Plant hormones. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 671–697.

Shinshi H, Wenzler H, Neuhaus JM, Felix G, Hofsteenge J, Meins Jr F. 1988. Evidence of amino and carboxyl-terminal processing of a plant defense-related enzyme primary structure of tobacco prepro-ß-1,3-glucanase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 85, 5541–5545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Suzuki M, Ario T, Hattori T, Nakamura K, Asahi T. 1994. Isolation and characterization of two tightly linked catalase genes from castor bean that are differentially regulated. Plant Molecular Biology 25, 507–516.[Web of Science][Medline]

Suzuki M, Miyamoto R, Hattori T, Nakamura K, Asahi T. 1995. Differential regulation of the expression in transgenic tobacco of the gene for ß-glucuronidase under the control of the 5'-upstream regions of two catalase genes from castor bean. Plant and Cell Physiology 36, 273–279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vögeli-Lange R, Fründt C, Hart CM, Nagy F, Meins Jr F. 1994. Developmental, hormonal and pathogenesis-related regulation of the tobacco class I ß-1,3-glucanase B promoter. Plant Molecular Biology 25, 299–311.[Web of Science][Medline]

Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Mino M, Mundy J, Chua N-H. 1990. Analysis of an ABA-responsive rice gene promoter in transgenic tobacco. Plant Molecular Biology 15, 905–912.[Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. Linkies, U. Schuster-Sherpa, S. Tintelnot, G. Leubner-Metzger, and K. Muller
Peroxidases identified in a subtractive cDNA library approach show tissue-specific transcript abundance and enzyme activity during seed germination of Lepidium sativum
J. Exp. Bot., October 30, 2009; (2009) erp318v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. Salaita, R. K. Kar, M. Majee, and A. B. Downie
Identification and characterization of mutants capable of rapid seed germination at 10 {degrees}C from activation-tagged lines of Arabidopsis thaliana
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2005; 56(418): 2059 - 2069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. V. Bartsev, W. J. Deakin, N. M. Boukli, C. B. McAlvin, G. Stacey, P. Malnoe, W. J. Broughton, and C. Staehelin
NopL, an Effector Protein of Rhizobium sp. NGR234, Thwarts Activation of Plant Defense Reactions
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2004; 134(2): 871 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
F. Elortza, T. S. Nuhse, L. J. Foster, A. Stensballe, S. C. Peck, and O. N. Jensen
Proteomic Analysis of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Membrane Proteins
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2003; 2(12): 1261 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leubner-Metzger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Meins, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leubner-Metzger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Meins, F., Jr
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leubner-Metzger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Meins, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?