Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardoso-Vilhena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardoso-Vilhena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cardoso-Vilhena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 52, No. 362, pp. 1901-1911, September 1, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


Original Papers

Does nitrogen supply affect the response of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno) to the combination of elevated CO2 and O3?

João Cardoso-Vilhena and Jeremy Barnes1

Air Pollution Laboratory, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Ridley Building, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

Received 15 November 2000; Accepted 30 May 2001


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno) was grown at ambient (350 µmol mol-1) or elevated CO2 (700 µmol mol-1) in charcoal/Purafil®-filtered air (CFA <5 nmol mol-1) or ozone (CFA +75 nmol mol-1 7 h d-1) at three levels of N supply (1.5, 4 and 14 mM NO-3), to test the hypothesis that the combined impacts of elevated CO2 and O3 on plant growth and photosynthetic capacity are affected by nitrogen availability. Shifts in foliar N content reflected the level of N supplied, and the growth stimulation induced by elevated CO2 was dependent on the level of N supply. At 60 d after transfer (DAT), elevated CO2 was found to increase total biomass by 44%, 29%, 12% in plants supplied with 14, 4 and 1.5 mM NO-3, respectively, and there was no evidence of photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 across N treatments; the maximum in vivo rate of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax) was similar in plants raised at elevated and ambient CO2. At 60 DAT, ozone exposure was found to suppress plant relative growth rate (RGR) and net photosynthesis (A) in plants supplied with 14 and 4 mM NO-3. However, O3 had no effect on the RGR of plants supplied with 1.5 mM NO-3 and this effect was accompanied by a reduced impact of the pollutant on A. Elevated CO2 counteracted the detrimental effects of O3 (i.e. the same ozone concentration that depressed RGR and A at ambient CO2 resulted in no significant effects when plants were raised at elevated CO2) at all levels of N supply and the effect was associated with a decline in O3 uptake at the leaf level.

Key words: Elevated CO2, tropospheric ozone, N, net photosynthesis, growth.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ground-level concentrations of CO2 and O3 continue to rise as a direct consequence of anthropogenic activities (Watson et al., 1990Go). Over the same time-scale that the tropospheric CO2 concentration has risen from ~280 µmol mol-1 to ~356 µmol mol-1, average background levels of O3 have approximately doubled (from 10–15 to 25–30 nmol mol-1) and UN-ECE critical levels (exposure limits) for the protection of vegetation are now regularly exceeded during the summer months in many parts of the developed world (Watson et al., 1990Go; Stockwell et al., 1997Go). Even if CO2 emissions are successfully restricted to the extent that the present rate of rise is sustained, atmospheric CO2 concentrations will have risen by a further ~80% by the end of the 21st century (Wigley et al., 1997Go). Since ground-level O3 concentrations are also expected to continue to rise for the forseeable future (Chameides et al., 1994Go), it is important to understand how these concomitant changes in atmospheric composition are likely to affect terrestrial vegetation in order to expedite the necessary revision of plant growth simulation models designed to assess the impacts of atmospheric change on crop growth and productivity. The potential significance of considering the way in which rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations will influence plant responses to O3, and vice versa, are emphasized by calculations by Hertstein et al. (based on data for spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L. cv. Turbo) that cereal yield increases arising from a business-as-usual scenario for CO2 could be 20% less than predicted if simultaneous increases in O3 are taken into account (Hertstein et al., 1995Go).

Individually, elevated CO2 and O3 have contrasting effects on plant growth and physiology. Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations are expected to enhance the growth and productivity of C3 plants, largely through stimulated rates of net photosynthesis (Cure and Acock, 1986Go; Drake et al., 1997Go). By contrast, exposure to O3 reduces growth and reproductive development in sensitive taxa, causes shifts in root/shoot carbon partitioning, depresses rates of net photosynthesis, and accelerates leaf senescence (Reich and Amundson, 1985Go; Cooley and Manning, 1987Go; Runeckles and Chevone, 1992Go; Pell et al., 1999Go).

Recent studies indicate that the decline in growth and photosynthesis observed in plants fumigated with O3 is often reduced when plants are raised at elevated CO2 (Barnes and Wellburn, 1998Go; Turcsányi et al., 2000Go). However, the existing database is inconsistent and several studies have shown that elevated CO2 did not ameliorate the detrimental effects of O3 (Barnes et al., 1995Go; Karnosky et al., 1998Go; Shimizu et al., 1997Go). The response of vegetation to the combination of rising CO2 and O3 is likely to be affected by N status (Cowling and Koziol, 1982Go; Paul and Driscoll, 1997Go; Stitt and Krapp, 1999Go), but it is not known to what extent differences in N availability may explain the contradictory responses observed in the literature. Several authors report plant growth and yield to be less responsive to elevated CO2 under conditions of limited N availability (Evans, 1989Go; Mitchell et al., 1993Go; McKee and Woodward, 1994Go; Rogers et al., 1996Go; Demmers-Derks et al., 1998Go; Lutze and Gifford, 1998Go) and photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 has been reported to be accentuated in N-limited plants (Curtis, 1996Go; Drake et al., 1997Go); declines in Rubisco content and activity having been found to be greater in N-deficient plants than in plants raised with an optimal N supply (Nie et al., 1993Go; Miglietta et al., 1996Go; Rogers et al., 1996Go; Harmens et al., 2000Go). Other studies have reported the impacts of elevated CO2 to be independent of N status (Wong, 1979Go; Hocking and Meyer, 1991Go).

There is scant information on the effects of N supply on plant responses to O3, as the majority of studies have focused on the impacts of overall nutrient limitation (Maurer et al., 1997Go; Whitfield et al., 1998Go). However, those few studies that have been conducted indicate that plants exhibiting low-N content may be less susceptible to O3. For example, Brewer et al. reported a reduction in O3-induced visible injury when spinach (Spinacia oleraceae L.) and mangels (Beta vulgaris L.) were grown under a low-N regime, in comparison to plants supplied with a high level of N (Brewer et al., 1961Go). Similarly, O3-induced reductions in biomass were observed in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) (Pell et al., 1990Go) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) (Tjoelker and Luxmoore, 1991Go) at high, but not low, N supply.

Although several findings show the impacts of elevated CO2 or O3 to be modulated by N availability, little attention has been paid to the way in which N nutrition influences the combined effects of these gases on plant growth and physiology. The primary aim of this study was, therefore, to determine whether N availability affects the degree to which elevated CO2 counteracts the detrimental effects of O3. Secondary aims included the examination of whether acclimation to elevated CO2 would be accentuated at low N supply and whether N availability would affect plant response to O3. The study employed spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) as a convenient model to study the combined effects of elevated CO2 and/or O3 on plant growth and physiology.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plant culture and fumigation
Seed of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) was sown in seed trays containing vermiculite and germinated in a controlled environment chamber supplied with charcoal/Purafil®-filtered air (CFA). Six days after germination, seedlings at the same developmental stage (first leaf) were transplanted to 2.28 dm3 pots containing acid-washed sand and transferred to eight controlled environment chambers which form part of a fumigation system described in detail elsewhere (Zheng et al., 1998Go). Chambers were illuminated by metal-halide lamps (Siemens HRH fittings plus 400 W HQI-T lamps supplied by Osram, St Helens, Merseyside, UK) providing a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of {approx}250 µmol m-2 s-1 at plant canopy height with a 14 h photoperiod. Diurnal temperature fluctuations ranged sinusoidally (tracking external changes in air temperature) from a night-time minimum of 15±0.2 °C to a day-time maximum of 23±0.3 °C. Air temperature in each chamber was logged continually (Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge, UK). Relative humidity was maintained at 65±5%. A factorial experimental design was employed to achieve four duplicated treatments: ambient CO2 (346±3 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA <5 nmol mol-1 O3); O3 (ambient CO2+75±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1 (10.00–17.00 h)); elevated CO2 (702±7 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA) and elevated CO2+O3 (elevated CO2+78±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1). Gas concentrations were monitored, logged and adjusted using a computer-controlled feedback system described elsewhere (Barnes et al., 1995Go). Gas concentrations and air flows in duplicate chambers were monitored daily to ensure uniformity between replicate chambers. Ozone was generated from particulate/charcoal/Purafil®-filtered air by electric-discharge (Wallace and Tiernan BA.023 Laboratory Ozonator, Tonbridge, Kent, UK), while compressed CO2 was supplied from cylinders (Distillers MG, Reigate, Surrey, UK). Both gases were filtered (sensu Brown and Roberts, 1988Go) to remove potential contaminants prior to injection into the air stream entering individual chambers (Barnes et al., 1995Go).

Plants were watered daily with a nutrient solution comprising 2 mM K2HPO4, 0.8 mM MgSO4, 70 µM Fe-EDTA, 46 µM H3BO3, 9 µM MnSO4, 1.6 µM CuSO4, 1.5 µM ZnSO4, 0.1 µM (NH4)6 Mo7O24. Three nitrogen treatments were imposed using Ca(NO3)2 as the source of NO-3: 14 mM NO-3, 4 mM NO-3, 1.5 mM NO-3. The change in calcium concentration was corrected using CaCl2. Pots were regularly flushed with deionized water to prevent accumulation of excess nutrient.

Growth and dry matter partitioning
Twenty plants were harvested upon initial transfer to the respective treatments. Subsequent harvests comprised five independent plants per chamber. These were made 32 d and 60 d after transfer (DAT) to the treatments. At each harvest, tiller number was counted, then plants were separated into root and shoot and washed prior to drying to constant weight in an oven at 70 °C. Plant relative growth rate (RGR), the RGR of component plant parts (RGR shoot=RGRS, RGR root=RGRR) and the allometric root : shoot coefficient (K=RGRR/RGRS) were calculated as described previously (Hunt, 1990Go). At the final harvest, dead leaf material was separated from the rest of the shoot.

Carbon and nitrogen analysis
At 32 and 60 DAT dried shoot material was ground and analysed for carbon (C) and N content using a RoboPrep-TCD C and N Element Analyser (Model 7002, Europa Scientific Ltd, Crewe, UK).

Gas exchange measurements
Leaves 4 and 7 on the main shoot were labelled upon emergence (15 and 33 DAT, respectively) and in situ rates of CO2/H2O exchange measured over the life-span of both leaves using a standard Parkinson leaf cuvette (model PCL-B, PP Systems, Hitchin, UK) linked to portable infrared gas analyser (Ciras-II, PP Systems, Hitchin, UK). Regular measurements were made at the growth CO2 concentration under chamber conditions (PPFD=182±3 µmol m-2 s-1 at the position occupied by the leaf in the cuvette; leaf temperature=23.5±0.1 °C; saturated vapour pressure deficit (SVPD)=0.91±0.01 kPa). When leaves reached full expansion (12 d after leaf emergence (DALE)), the response of CO2 assimilation to changes in the intercellular CO2 concentration (ci) was determined at cuvette CO2 concentrations of 100, 150, 200, 250, 350, and 1000 µmol mol-1. Measurements were made using an automated Parkinson leaf cuvette (model auto-PLC-B, PP Systems) employing a leaf temperature of 22.8±0.1 °C under a PPFD (1000±1 µmol m-2 s-1) shown by prior experimentation to be high enough to achieve the light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation. Stomatal conductance to water vapour (gH2O), the rate of CO2 assimilation under growth conditions (A), the light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation measured at 350 µmol CO2 mol-1 (A350) and the light- and CO2-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation (Amax) were calculated (von Caemmerer and Farquhar, 1981Go). The maximum in vivo rate of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax) was calculated from the linear portion of the measured A/ci response as described previously (Harley et al., 1992Go). Values for Kc (Michaelis constant for Rubisco carboxylation), Ko (Michaelis constant for Rubisco oxygenation), and {tau} (Rubisco specificity factor) (measured by Jordan and Ogren, 1984Go) were employed in calculations, correcting for temperature dependencies (according to Harley et al., 1992Go).

Leaf boundary layer resistance under chamber conditions was measured using the wet-blotting paper method described earlier (Unsworth et al., 1984Go). Ozone uptake at the leaf-level was calculated by analogy with Fick's first law for gas diffusion from measurements of leaf boundary layer conductance and gH2O, multiplying by 0.612 (Nobel, 1983Go) to account for the slower rate of molecular diffusion of O3 in air compared to H2O. The intercellular O3 concentration was assumed to be zero (based on the measurements of Laisk et al., 1989Go).

Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Data were first checked for normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, and log-transformed prior to analysis as required. Within each N level, treatment means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test calculated at the 5% level. Due to significant CO2xO3 interactions, the main effects of elevated CO2 and O3 were tested using an independent t-test (sensu Olszyk et al., 2000Go). Interactions between elevated CO2xO3xN were tested by MANOVA. There were no significant differences between data for replicate chambers, so analyses were performed on the basis that plants in replicate chambers were as likely to be as similar to, or as different from, plants within an individual chamber.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plant growth and dry matter partitioning
N supply significantly (P<=0.001) affected RGR (Table 1Go) and biomass accumulation (Fig. 1Go) at 32 and 60 DAT. The increase in plant biomass at higher levels of N supply was mainly due to an increase in surviving tiller numbers (Table 2Go). In addition, plants grown at 14 mM NO-3 exhibited a reduction in the partitioning of biomass to the root relative to the shoot (i.e. reduced K) in comparison to their counterparts supplied with 4 and 1.5 mM NO-3 (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Impact of exposure to elevated CO2 and/or O3 on the relative growth rate (RGR) and allometric root : shoot coefficient (K=RGRR/RGRS) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) supplied with contrasting levels of N

Plants were grown in duplicate controlled environment chambers ventilated with: ambient CO2 (346±3 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA <5 nmol mol-1 O3); O3 (ambient CO2+75±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1 (10.00–17.00 h)); elevated CO2 (702±7 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA); elevated CO2+O3 (elevated CO2+78±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1) and supplied with 1.5, 4 and 14 mM NO-3. Plants were harvested 32 d and 60 d after transfer (DAT) to fumigation chambers. Values represent mean±SE (n=10). Values bearing the same letter within each N treatment are not significantly different at the 5% level. Interactive effects of elevated CO2, O3 and N were tested by MANOVA; level of significance indicated by P value; n.s.=no significant difference at 5% level.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Impact of exposure to elevated CO2 and/or O3 on the total plant biomass of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) supplied with contrasting levels of N. Plants were grown in duplicate controlled environment chambers ventilated with: ambient CO2, {square}, (346±3 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA <5 nmol mol-1 O3); O3, {blacksquare}, (ambient CO2+75±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1 (10.00–17.00 h)); elevated CO2, {circ}, (702±7 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA); elevated CO2+O3, •, (elevated CO2+78±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1) and supplied with 1.5, 4 or 14 mM NO-3. Plants were harvested 32 and 60 d after transfer (DAT) to fumigation chambers. Values represent mean±SE (n=10).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Impact of exposure to elevated CO2 and/or O3 on tiller number and dead leaf tissue of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) supplied with contrasting levels of N

Plants were grown in duplicate controlled environment chambers ventilated with: ambient CO2 (346±3 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA <5 nmol mol-1 O3); O3 (ambient CO2+75±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1 (10.00–17.00 h)); elevated CO2, (702±7 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA); elevated CO2+O3 (elevated CO2+78±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1) and supplied with 1.5, 4 and 14 mM NO-3). Plants were harvested 32 d and 60 d after transfer (DAT) to fumigation chambers. Values represent mean±SE (n=6). Values bearing the same letter within each N treatment are not significantly different at the 5% level. Interactive effects of elevated CO2, O3 and N were tested by MANOVA; level of significance indicated by P value. n.s.=no significant difference at 5% level.

 
Plants raised at elevated CO2 exhibited significantly (P<=0.05) higher initial RGRs (Table 1Go) and this was reflected in greater biomass accumulation at 32 and 60 DAT in comparison with equivalent plants grown at ambient CO2 (Fig. 1Go). However, the increase in RGR induced by elevated CO2 was not sustained, so that between 32 and 60 DAT the RGR was actually lower (P<=0.05) than that of equivalent plants grown at ambient CO2 (Table 1Go). The impact of elevated CO2 was associated with an increase in surviving tiller numbers by 32 DAT (Table 2Go). However, by 60 DAT this effect was no longer significant. CO2-enrichment also increased K (Table 1Go), indicating a relatively greater investment in root growth relative to the shoot compared with plants raised at ambient CO2.

The extent of the increase in growth under elevated CO2 was significantly affected by the level of N supply after both 32 and 60 DAT (CO2xN, P<=0.001), with the increment in biomass by the final harvest (60 DAT) greatest in the CO2-enriched plants supplied with the highest level of N (44%) compared to those supplied with 4 (29%) or 1.5 mM NO-3 (12%) (Fig. 1Go). Elevated CO2 also accelerated leaf senescence, hence the increase in dead leaf tissue in plants supplied with 1.5 and 4 mM NO-3, but this effect was not observed at 14 mM NO-3 (Table 2Go).

Ozone exposure significantly reduced plant biomass irrespective of N supply at 32 DAT (Fig. 1Go). Between 32 and 60 DAT there was no significant effect of ozone on RGR (Table 1Go). By 60 DAT, ozone significantly (P<=0.05) reduced RGR and accumulated biomass in plants supplied with 14 and 4 mM NO3-, but not in those supplied with 1.5 mM NO3-. Ozone-exposed plants supplied with 1.5 and 4 mM NO3- exhibited a greater decline in root growth relative to that of the shoot (reduction in K at 32 DAT) (Table 1Go). However, between 32 and 60 DAT this trend was reversed, so that by 60 DAT no significant differences in K were observed in plants supplied with 1.5 and 4 mM NO3-, but a significant (P<=0.05) reduction occurred in plants supplied with 14 mM NO3-. Ozone exposure resulted in no change in tiller number, but increased the relative percentage of dead leaf tissue across N treatments by 60 DAT (Table 2Go).

In the combined treatment, elevated CO2 counteracted (CO2xO3, P<=0.01) the negative effects of O3 on plant growth and root : shoot partitioning, irrespective of N availability (Tables 1Go, 2Go; Fig. 1Go).

Shoot carbon and nitrogen content
There was no consistent effect of the different treatments and/or N supply on shoot C content. Shoot N content corresponded to the level of N supplied (Table 3Go) and declined with plant age across treatments. At both harvests, shoot N content tended to be lower for plants raised at elevated CO2 in comparison with their ambient CO2-grown counterparts. Shifts in the C/N ratio were mainly due to effects on N content.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Impact of exposure to elevated CO2 and/or O3 on the nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) content of the shoot, and on the C to N ratio of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) supplied with contrasting levels of N

Shoot carbon and nitrogen content expressed as percentage of shoot dry weight. Plants were grown in duplicate controlled environment chambers ventilated with: ambient CO2 (346±3 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA <5 nmol mol-1 O3); O3 (ambient CO2+75±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1 (10.00–17.00 h)); elevated CO2 (702±7 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA); elevated CO2+O3 (elevated CO2+78±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1) and supplied with 1.5, 4 and 14 mM NO-3. Plants were harvested 32 d and 60 d after transfer (DAT) to fumigation chambers. Values represent mean±SE (n=6). Values bearing the same letter within each N treatment are not significantly different at the 5% level. Interactive effects of elevated CO2, O3 and N were tested by MANOVA; level of significance indicated by P value, n.s.=no significant difference at 5% level.

 

Stomatal conductance and O3 uptake
Figure 2Go shows the effects of elevated CO2 and O3 on gH2O over the life-span of leaves 4 and 7 on the main shoot of plants grown at contrasting levels of N supply. Independently, elevated CO2 and O3 reduced gH2O in both leaves, with the magnitude of effect being independent of N supply. However, in the combined treatment, O3 exposure resulted in no greater decline in gH2O than that induced by elevated CO2 alone (i.e. effects of the gases on gH2O were less than additive).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Impact of exposure to elevated CO2 and/or O3 on stomatal conductance (gH2O) over the life-span of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) leaves 4 and 7. Plants were grown in duplicate controlled environment chambers ventilated with: ambient CO2, {square}, (346±3 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA <5 nmol mol-1 O3); O3, {blacksquare}, (ambient CO2+75±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1 (10.00–17.00 h)); elevated CO2, {circ}, (702±7 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA); elevated CO2+O3, •, (elevated CO2+78±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1) and supplied with 1.5, 4 or 14 mM NO-3. Values represent mean±SE (n=6–10).

 
Figure 3Go shows O3 uptake modelled over the life-span of leaves 4 and 7 from measurements of boundary layer conductance, gH2O and O3 concentrations. Data revealed that CO2-enrichment reduced cumulative O3 uptake (on average by 25%) over the leaf life-span in plants supplied with 4 and 14 mM NO-3. Effects were less marked in plants supplied with 1.5 mM NO-3.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cumulative O3 uptake modeled from measurements of gH2O and leaf boundary layer conductance made under growth conditions over the life-span of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) leaves 4 and 7. Plants were grown in duplicate controlled environment chambers ventilated with: ambient CO2, {square}, (346±3 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA <5 nmol mol-1 O3); O3, {blacksquare}, (ambient CO2+75±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1 (10.00–17.00 h)); elevated CO2, {circ}, (702±7 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA); elevated CO2+O3, •, (elevated CO2+78±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1) and supplied with 1.5, 4 or 14 mM NO-3.

 

Net photosynthesis
Figure 4Go shows the impacts of elevated CO2 and/or O3 on A over the leaf life-span for plants grown under contrasting N regimes. Plants raised and measured at elevated CO2 exhibited significantly (P<=0.05) higher, and sustained, rates of A than equivalent plants raised and measured at ambient CO2, irrespective of N supply. Impacts of O3 were more complex. In leaf 4, exposure of ambient CO2-grown plants resulted in a decline in A following attainment of full leaf expansion (12 DALE) in plants supplied with 14 and 4 mM NO-3, but not in those supplied with 1.5 mM NO-3 (O3xN, P<=0.01). In leaf 7, O3 reduced A across N treatments, but effects were restricted to the latter stages of the leaf life-span in plants receiving 4 and 1.5 mM NO-3. Under CO2-enriched conditions, O3 exposure resulted in no significant change in A and this was unaffected by N status (i.e. elevated CO2 counteracted the negative effects of O3 on A over the leaf life-span irrespective of N supply).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Impact of exposure to elevated CO2 and/or O3 on net CO2 assimilation (A) over the life-span of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) leaves 4 and 7. Plants were grown in duplicate controlled environment chambers ventilated with: ambient CO2, {square}, (346±3 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA <5 nmol mol-1 O3); O3, {blacksquare}, (ambient CO2+75±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1 (10.00–17.00 h)); elevated CO2, {circ}, (702±7 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA); elevated CO2+O3, •, (elevated CO2+78±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1) and supplied with 1.5, 4 or 14 mM NO-3. Values represent mean±SE (n=6–10).

 
Measurements of A350, Amax and estimates of Vcmax for leaves 4 and 7 at full expansion are shown in Fig. 5Go. Overall, measured photosynthetic parameters were c. 20% lower in plants supplied with low (1.5 mM NO-3) compared with high N (14 mM NO-3). There was no evidence of photosynthetic acclimation at elevated CO2; A350, Amax and Vcmax were not significantly different between elevated and ambient CO2-grown plants. A/ci response measurements were performed at the attainment of full leaf expansion (12 DALE), when O3 effects on A were marginal (see Fig. 3Go). Consistent with these findings, O3 was found to have no significant impact on A350, Amax and Vcmax at this stage of leaf development.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Impact of exposure to elevated CO2 and/or O3 on the light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation measured at 350 µmol CO2 mol-1 (A350) or 1000 µmol CO2 mol-1 (Amax), and on the maximum in vivo rate of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hanno) leaves 4 and 7. Gas exchange measurements were made 12 d after emergence of leaves 4 and leaf 7, respectively. Plants were grown in duplicate controlled environment chambers and exposed to: ambient CO2, {square}, (346±3 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA <5 nmol mol-1 O3); O3, {blacksquare}, (ambient CO2+75±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1 (10.00–17.00 h)); elevated CO2, , (702±7 µmol mol-1 CO2+CFA); elevated CO2+O3, , (elevated CO2+78±1 nmol mol-1 O3 7 h d-1) and supplied with 1.5, 4 and 14 mM NO-3. Values represent mean±SE (n=6).

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Doubling the atmospheric CO2 concentration resulted in a significant increase in plant biomass and, in agreement with several other studies (Poorter et al., 1988Go; Wong, 1990Go; Rogers et al., 1996Go; Jitla et al., 1997Go), this effect was primarily due to the stimulation of plant RGR in the early stages of growth. Consistent with previous reports (Fangmeier et al., 1996Go; Rogers et al., 1996Go; Demmers-Derks et al., 1998Go; Lutze and Gifford, 1998Go), the relative impact of elevated CO2 on plant growth was dependent on N supply as the gain in biomass at elevated CO2 after 60 d ranged from 44% (14 mM NO-3) to 29% (4 mM NO-3) and 12% (1.5 mM NO-3). The finding that the extra tillering induced by elevated CO2 was reduced at lower levels of N supply is consistent with the reported effects of the constraint of ‘sink development’ on the growth stimulation induced by elevated CO2 (Rogers et al., 1996Go). Extra tillers in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and wheat have been shown to be important in maximizing the growth and yield stimulation obtained under CO2-enriched conditions (Conroy et al., 1994Go; Jitla et al., 1997Go).

No evidence of photosynthetic adjustment (i.e. down-regulation of photosynthesis) at elevated CO2 was found in the present study, irrespective of N supply. This finding is consistent with the lack of photosynthetic adjustment reported in plants exposed to elevated CO2 in the field or in pot-based studies under conditions of adequate nutrient supply (Habash et al., 1995Go; Mulholland et al., 1997Go; Garcia et al., 1998Go). The present findings contrast with those of previous authors who have reported decreases in Rubisco content and activity under sustained exposure to elevated CO2 in plants grown under N limitation—though differences in the timing of gas exchange measurements in relation to leaf development may be important (Nie et al., 1993Go; Miglietta et al., 1996Go; Rogers et al., 1996Go). In the present study, no reduction in leaf Rubisco activity or photosynthetic potential was detected at elevated CO2 in the two low N treatments (1.5 and 4 mM NO-3), despite a significant reduction in sink development in plants raised at elevated CO2. This finding suggests that plants raised at elevated CO2 may have readjusted their resources to support photosynthesis and growth in relation to N availability, in order to maintain an adequate balance between supply and demand. This is supported by the finding that between 32 and 60 DAT, the RGR of plants grown under CO2-enrichment was actually lower than that of their ambient CO2-grown counterparts. As a result, shoot N content was only marginally reduced at elevated CO2 (12%) in plants supplied with 1.5 mM NO-3. The importance of balancing supply and demand to circumvent the need for photosynthetic adjustment at elevated CO2 has been illustrated in hydroponically-grown wheat, supplied with N in proportion to plant growth (Farage et al., 1998Go). Moreover, findings are consistent with reports that the decline in Rubisco activity under CO2-enriched conditions is strongly correlated with reductions in leaf N content (Nakano et al., 1997Go; Harmens et al., 2000Go; Makino et al., 2000Go). Additional studies indicate that leaf N content may have to fall below a species-specific threshold in order to trigger photosynthetic adjustment under CO2-enriched conditions (Delgado et al., 1994Go; Petterson and McDonald, 1994Go; Riviere-Rolland et al., 1996Go).

Environmentally-relevant O3-exposure reduced growth and photosynthetic rate in plants supplied with 4 and 14 mM NO-3. However, O3 had no impact on these parameters in plants supplied with the lowest level of N (1.5 mM NO-3). This result is consistent with findings for radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) where O3 reduced biomass at high, but not low, N (Pell et al., 1990Go; Tjoelker and Luxmoore, 1991Go). The absence of a depression in A at low N supply was consistent with the lower gH2O, and hence cumulative O3 uptake, observed over the life-span of leaf 4 in plants supplied with 1.5 mM NO-3. However, increases in the reallocation of nitrogen from old to young leaves due to accelerated leaf senescence, as observed in plants exposed to O3, may have made some contribution in alleviating N limitation in the ‘young leaves’ of polluted plants (Manderscheid et al., 1992Go). This is supported by this study's finding that O3-exposed plants supplied with 1.5 mM O3 exhibited an 18% increase in A on the attainment of full leaf expansion. Further work is needed to evaluate the importance of N reallocation from senescent to young leaves as a compensation mechanism in plants exposed to O3 under conditions of low N supply.

In the combined treatment, elevated CO2 counteracted the negative effects of O3 on growth and photosynthesis observed at ambient CO2. Similar results have been reported for other cultivars of wheat (McKee et al., 1995Go, 1997Goa, bGo; Mulholland et al., 1997Go) and other herbaceous species (see tables fomulated by Cardoso-Vilhena et al., 1998Go; Turcsányi et al., 2000Go; Olszyk et al., 2000Go). One factor common to all these species is the responsiveness of the stomata to an increase in the atmospheric CO2 concentration such that the flux of O3 to the leaf interior would be substantially reduced under CO2-enriched conditions. Consistent with the view (Barnes and Wellburn, 1998Go) that this is a vital consideration governing the way in which rising CO2 concentrations will influence plant responses to O3 (and other gaseous pollutants that are not absorbed in significant quantities through the leaf cuticle), it is notable that the protection against O3 afforded by elevated CO2 in the present study was associated with a marked reduction (c. 25%) in O3 uptake over the life-span of individual leaves, as a consequence of the decline in stomatal conductance induced by CO2-enrichment. Moreover, the degree of protection against O3 afforded by elevated CO2 was unaffected by N supply. This observation is consistent with previous findings for sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula Michx.), aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (Volin and Reich, 1996Go; Heagle et al., 1999Go). These data suggest that attempts to introduce cost-effective control strategies with the aim of minimizing the impacts of photochemical oxidant pollution on vegetation may need to take into account the impact of rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations in modulating the effects of O3 on plant growth and productivity. First, however, there is an urgent need to establish exposurexresponse relationships for the combined effects of elevated CO2 and O3 on the yield of various crops.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Professor AW Davison (Newcastle University, UK) and Dr I McKee (Essex University, UK) for advice during the course of this study, and Mr P Green, Mr A White and K Taylor for technical assistance. The work was supported by a grant from The Portuguese Ministry of Science and Technology—PRAXIS XXI Scheme (BD/9155/96) and the work was undertaken during JDB's tenure as a Royal Society Research Fellow.


    Notes
 
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +44 191 222 5229. E-mail: J.D.Barnes{at}ncl.ac.uk Back


    Abbreviations
 
{tau}, Rubisco specificity factor; A, rate of CO2 assimilation; A350, light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation rate at an ambient CO2 concentration of 350 µmol mol-1; Amax, light- and CO2-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation; CFA, charcoal/Purafil®-filtered air; DALE, days after leaf emergence; DAT, days after transfer; gH2O, stomatal conductance to water vapour; K, root/shoot allometric coefficient; Kc and Ko, Michaelis constants for Rubisco carboxylation and oxygenation, respectively; PPFD, photosynthetically active photon flux density; RGR, plant relative growth rate; RGRR, RGR of root; RGRS, RGR of shoot; Rubisco, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; Vcmax; maximum in vivo rate of Rubisco carboxylation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Barnes JD, Ollerenshaw J, Whitfield CP. 1995. Effects of elevated CO2 and/or O3 on growth, development and physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Global Change Biology 1, 129–142.

Barnes JD, Wellburn AR. 1998. Air pollutant combinations. In: de Kok LJ, Stuhlen I, eds. Responses of plant metabolism to air pollution and global change. Leiden: Backhuys Publishing, 147–164.

Brewer RF, Guillemet FB, Creveling RK. 1961. Influence of N-P-K fertilization on incidence and severity of oxidant injury to mangels and spinach. Soil Science 92, 298–301.

Brown KA, Roberts TM. 1988. Effects of O3 on foliar leaching in Norway spruce: confounding factors due to NOx production during O3 generation. Environmental Pollution 55, 55–73.[Medline]

Cardoso-Vilhena J, Balaguer L, Daymond J, Barnes JD. 1998. Amelioration of ozone damage by elevated CO2. In: de Kok LJ, Stuhlen I, eds. Responses of plant metabolism to air pollution and global change. Leiden: Backhuys Publishing, 281–282.

Chameides WL, Kasibhatla PS, Yienger J, Levy H. 1994. Growth of continental-scale metro-agro-plexes, regional ozone pollution and world food production. Science 264, 74–77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Conroy JP, Seneweera S, Basra AS, Rogers G, Nissen-Woller B. 1994. Influence of rising atmospheric concentrations and temperature on growth, yield and grain quality of cereal crops. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 21, 741–758.

Cooley DR, Manning WJ. 1987. The impact of ozone on assimilate partitioning in plants: a review. Environmental Pollution 47, 95–113.[Medline]

Cowling DW, Koziol MJ. 1982. Mineral nutrition and plant response to air pollutants. In: Unsworth MH, Ormrod DP, eds. Effects of gaseous air pollutants in agriculture and horticulture. London, UK: Butterworth Scientific, 349–375.

Cure JD, Acock B. 1986. Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 38, 127–145.

Curtis PS. 1996. A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 127–137.

Delgado E, Mitchell AC, Parry MAJ, Driscoll SP, Mitchell VJ, Lawlor DW. 1994. Interacting effects of CO2 concentration, temperature and nitrogen supply on the photosynthesis and composition of winter wheat leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 17, 1205–1213.

Demmers-Derks H, Mitchell RAC, Mitchell VJ, Lawlor DW. 1998. Response of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield and biochemical composition to elevated CO2 and temperature at two nitrogen applications. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 829–836.

Drake BD, Gonzalez-Meler MA, Long SP. 1997. More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48, 608–639.

Evans JR. 1989. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78, 9–19.[Web of Science]

Fangmeier A, Gruters U, Vermehren B, Jäger H. 1996. Responses of some cereal cultivars to CO2 enrichment and tropospheric ozone at different levels of nitrogen supply. Angewandte-Botanik 70, 12–18.

Farage PK, McKee IF, Long SP. 1998. Does a low nitrogen supply necessarily lead to acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2? Plant Physiology 118, 573–580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garcia RL, Long SP, Wall GW, Osborne CP, Kimball BA, Nie GY, Pinter PJ, Lamorte L, Wechsung F. 1998. Photosynthesis and conductance of spring-wheat leaves: field response to continuous free-air atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 659–669.

Habash DZ, Paul MJ, Parry MAJ, Keys AJ, Lawlor DW. 1995. Increased capacity for photosynthesis in wheat grown at elevated CO2: the relationship between electron transport and carbon metabolism. Planta 197, 482–489.[Web of Science]

Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR. 1992. Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 15, 271–282.

Harmens H, Stirling CM, Marshall C, Farrar JF. 2000. Does down-regulation of photosynthetic capacity by elevated CO2 depend on N supply in Dactylis glomerata? Physiologia Plantarum 108, 43–50.

Heagle AS, Miller JE, Booker FL, Pursley WA. 1999. Ozone stress, carbon dioxide enrichment and nitrogen fertility interactions in cotton. Crop Science 39, 731–741.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hertstein U, Grunhäge L, Jäger H-J. 1995. Assessment of past, present and future impacts of ozone and carbon dioxide on crop yields. Atmospheric Environment 29, 2031–2039.

Hocking PJ, Meyer CP. 1991. Effects of CO2 enrichment and nitrogen stress on growth, and partitioning of dry matter and nitrogen in wheat and maize. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 18, 339–356.

Hunt R. 1990. Basic growth analysis. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.

Jitla DS, Rogers GS, Seneweera SP, Basra AS, Oldfield RJ, Conroy JP. 1997. Accelerated early growth of rice at elevated CO2. Is it related to development changes in the shoot apex? Plant Physiology 115, 15–22.[Abstract]

Jordan DB, Ogren WL. 1984. The CO2/O2 specificity of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase: dependence on ribulose-bisphosphate concentration, pH and temperature. Planta 161, 308–313.[Web of Science]

Karnosky DF, Podila GK, Gagnon Z, Petcher P, Akkapeddi A, Sheng Y, Riemenschneider DE, Coleman MD, Dickson RE, Isebrands JG. 1998. Genetic control of responses to interacting tropospheric ozone and CO2 in Populus tremuloides. Chemosphere 36, 807–812.

Laisk A, Kull O, Moldau H. 1989. Ozone concentration in leaf intercellular air spaces is close to zero. Plant Physiology 90, 1163–1167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lutze JL, Gifford RM. 1998. Acquisition and allocation of carbon and nitrogen by Danthonia richardsonii in response to restricted nitrogen supply and CO2 enrichment. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 1133–1141.

Makino A, Nakano H, Mae T, Shimada T, Yamamoto N. 2000. Photosynthesis, plant growth and N allocation in transgenic rice plants with decreased Rubisco under CO2 enrichment. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 383–389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Manderscheid R, Jäger H-J, Kress LW. 1992. Effects of ozone on foliar nitrogen metabolism of Pinus taeda L. and implications for carbohydrate metabolism. New Phytologist 121, 623–633.

Maurer S, Matyssek R, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Landolt W, Einig W. 1997. Nutrition and the ozone sensitivity of birch (Betula pendula). I. Responses at the leaf level. Trees 12, 1–10.

McKee IF, Woodward FI. 1994. CO2 enrichment responses of wheat: interactions with temperature, nitrate and phosphate. New Phytologist 127, 447–453.

McKee IF, Eiblmeier M, Polle A. 1997a. Enhanced ozone-tolerance in wheat grown at an elevated CO2 concentration: ozone exclusion and detoxification. New Phytologist 137, 275–284.[Web of Science]

McKee IF, Farage PK, Long SP. 1995. The interactive effects of elevated CO2 and O3 concentration on photosynthesis in spring wheat. Photosynthesis Research 45, 111–119.

McKee IF, Farage PK, Long SP. 1997b. Will elevated CO2 concentrations protect the yield of wheat from O3 damage? Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 77–84.

Miglietta E, Giuntoli A, Bindi M. 1996. The effect of free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) and soil nitrogen availability on the photosynthetic capacity of wheat. Photosynthesis Research 47, 281–290.

Mitchell RAC, Mitchell VJ, Driscoll SP, Franklin J, Lawlor DW. 1993. Effects of increased CO2 concentration and temperature on growth and yield of winter wheat at two levels of nitrogen application. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 521–529.

Mulholland BJ, Craigon J, Black CR, Colls JJ, Atherton J, Landon G. 1997. Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 on gas exchange and chlorophyll content in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 1853–1863.

Nakano H, Makino A, Mae T. 1997. The effect of elevated partial pressures of CO2 on the relationship between photosynthetic capacity and N content in rice leaves. Plant Physiology 115, 191–198.[Abstract]

Nie GY, Long SP, Webber A. 1993. The effect of nitrogen supply on down-regulation of photosynthesis in spring wheat grown in an elevated CO2 concentration. Plant Physiology 102, 138.

Nobel PS. 1983. Biochemical plant physiology and ecology. New York: Freeman and Co.

Olszyk DM, Tingey DT, Watrud L, Seidler R, Andersen C. 2000. Interactive effects of O3 and CO2: implications for terrestrial ecosystems. In: Singh SN, ed. Trace gas emissions and plants. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 97–136.

Paul MJ, Driscoll SP. 1997. Sugar repression of photosynthesis: the role of carbohydrates in signalling nitrogen deficiency through source : sink imbalance. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 110–116.

Pell E, Winner WE, Vinten-Johansen C, Mooney HA. 1990. Response of radish to multiple stresses. I. Physiological and growth responses to changes in ozone and nitrogen. New Phytologist 115, 439–446.

Pell EJ, Sinn JP, Brendley BW, Samuelson L, Vinten-Johansen C, Tien M, Skillman J. 1999. Differential response of four tree species to ozone-induced acceleration of foliar senescence. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 779–790.

Pettersson R, McDonald JS. 1994. Effects of nitrogen supply on the acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2. Photosynthesis Research 39, 389–400.

Poorter H, Pot S, Lambers H. 1988. The effect of an elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on growth, photosynthesis and respiration of Plantago major. Physiologia Plantarum 73, 553–559.

Reich PB, Amundson RG. 1985. Ambient levels of ozone reduce net photosynthesis in tree and crop species. Science 230, 566–570.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Riviere-Roland H, Contard P, Betsche T. 1996. Adaptation of pea to elevated atmospheric CO2: rubisco, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and chloroplast phosphate translocator at different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 109–117.

Rogers GS, Milham PJ, Gillings M, Conroy JP. 1996. Sink strength may be the key to growth and nitrogen responses in N-deficient wheat at elevated CO2. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23, 253–264.[Web of Science]

Runeckles VC, Chevone BI. 1992. Crop responses to ozone. In: Lefohn AS, eds. Surface-level ozone exposures and their effects on vegetation. Chelsea, USA: Lewis Publishers, 189–270.

Shimizu H, Kai K, Omasa K. 1997. Effects of elevated concentrations of CO2 and O3 singly or in mixture on the growth of several herbaceous wild plant species. Journal of Agriculture and Meteorology 52, 801–806.

Stitt M, Krapp A. 1999. The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: the physiological and molecular background. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 583–621.

Stockwell WR, Kramm G, Scheel H-E, Mohen VA, Seiler W. 1997. Ozone formation, destruction and exposure in Europe and the United States. In: Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Heath RL, eds. Forest decline and ozone. A comparison of controlled chamber and field experiments. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1–38.

Tjoelker MG, Luxmoore RJ. 1991. Soil nitrogen and chronic ozone stress influence physiology, growth and nutrient status of Pinus taeda L. and Liriodendron tulipifera L. seedlings. New Phytologist 119, 69–81.

Turcsányi E, Cardoso-Vilhena J, Daymond J, Gillespie C, Balaguer L, Ollerenshaw J, Barnes J. 2000. Impacts of tropospheric ozone: past, present and likely future. In: Singh SN, ed. Trace gas emissions and plants. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 249–272.

Unsworth MH, Heagle AS, Heck WW. 1984. Gas exchange in open-top field chambers. I. Measurement and analysis of atmospheric resistances to gas exchange. Atmospheric Environment 18, 373–380.

Volin JC, Reich PB. 1996. Interaction of elevated CO2 and O3 on growth, photosynthesis and respiration of three perennial species grown in low and high nitrogen. Physiologia Plantarum 97, 674–684.

von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153, 376–387.[Web of Science]

Watson RT, Rodhe H, Oescheger H, Siegenthaler U. 1990. Greenhouse gases and aerosols. In: Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ, eds. Climate change—the IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–40.

Whitfield CP, Davison AW, Ashenden TW. 1998. The effects of nutrient limitation on the response of Plantago major to ozone. New Phytologist 140, 219–230.

Wigley TML, Jain AK, Joos F, Nyenzi BS, Shukla PR. 1997. Implications of proposed CO2 emissions limitations. In: Houghton JT, Meira-Filho LG, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, eds. Implications of proposed CO2 emissions limitations. IPCC technical paper 4. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wong S-C. 1979. Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and plant growth. I. Interactions of nitrogen and photosynthetic capacity in C3 and C4 plants. Oecologia 44, 68–74.[Web of Science]

Wong S-C. 1990. Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and plant growth. II. Non-structural carbohydrate content in cotton plants and its effect on growth parameters. Photosynthesis Research 23, 171–180.

Zheng Y, Stevenson KJ, Barrowcliffe R, Chen S, Wang H, Barnes JD. 1998. Ozone levels in Chongqing: a potential threat to crop plants commonly grown in the region? Environmental Pollution 99, 299–308.[Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardoso-Vilhena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardoso-Vilhena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cardoso-Vilhena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?